Stannis Baratheon
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2015
- Messages
- 1,281
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Already mentioned. Our Mig-29 deal was a highly corrupt one.Don't forget the high maintenance of mig-29....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Already mentioned. Our Mig-29 deal was a highly corrupt one.Don't forget the high maintenance of mig-29....
They're not comparable because they are in different weight classes.Most nations go for the Su-30 rather than the Mig-29. Su-30 has recorded kills against Mig-29s. Su-30 is also a multi-role fighter. Price between the 2 isn't much, thus it's always better to go for the Su-30.
The Sukhoi requires even more maintenance.Don't forget the high maintenance of mig-29....
Weight really doesn't matter when it comes to the Su-30's manoeuvrability.They're not comparable because they are in different weight classes.
MiG 29 is a Medium class fighter
Su-30 is a Heavy class fighter.
Consequently, there is a difference in their associated costs - and not just outright purchase costs but also operating costs and maintenance requirements which are all much higher for a heavy class fighter compared to a medium class fighter.
And yes, there is a big difference in the price of the two fighters now. Sukhoi's costs have syrocketed and almost doubled since 2010.
The new engines for the Su-30 also reduced its maintenance costs.The Sukhoi requires even more maintenance.
Apart from that the new MiG 29 versions are compared to before much less maintenance intensive. They have had a massive change in equipment.
What are you talking about? Its not about maneuverability.Weight really doesn't matter when it comes to the Su-30's manoeuvrability.
Yes, but also compared to its own self.The new engines for the Su-30 also reduced its maintenance costs.
1. Su-30 has better equipments and can carry bigger load.What are you talking about? Its not about maneuverability.
Weight is a class issue. It corresponds to what kind of
1.equipment the plane can carry, the armament the plane can carry
2.the range it can cover in a sortie
3.the maintenance time(on ground time) and costs(capital acquisition cost and operating cost per sortie) for the plane.
A Heavy class fighter has much more in points 1 and 2 but in point 3 it is seriously disadvantaged vis-a-vis a M-MRCA.
These are trade-off's that can not be wished away.
Yes, but also compared to its own self.
At the end of the day, a Su-30 will need more maintenance time(on ground) and much higher operating costs compared to a new generation MiG 29.
However I am agreeing with you that the old MiG 29's were horrendously maintenance intensive and their engines fuel-inefficient.
The new generation of MiG 29's however have changed all of that. A clear testament is the Indian Navy recently purchasing MiG 29K's which are purpose bought to fight and win against F-16 Blk 52's of the Pakistan Navy.
A L15 has maximum speed 1487 km/h. Yak130 maximum speed 1050 km/h. Manpad like FN6 maximum speed 2160 km/h. (Based on wiki)
So how the L15 will escape the superior speed of manpads? Also the air to air and surface to air missiles. Idiot should learn that there comes the protection in effect, such as flares and jammers.
Also when the Yak130 order was placed it was a reality and had many external operators, L15 was in copying stage and still in prototype and recently getting orders. So the newer versions of aircrafts will be superior to the older. Someone let this simple logic get through his head. 50 poisa soldier seem to be a paid agent installed here to do spam and troll on anything and everything on BD related matters by his political masters, whom are not even interested to buy f7. As if jamat bomb will solve anything like ISIS foot soldiers. Guess what jamat and ISIS both dont need air force
4.40, 11.45
One assumes your proposition is that YAK is not really combat capable and you are saying BAF need not get involved in COIN operation in BD.
If that is the case I would agree. There is no scope for any insurgency in BD that I can conceive will require anything more that the army or even the BDR.