帅的一匹
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2012
- Messages
- 12,820
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
surajisin?SUM TING WONG??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
surajisin?SUM TING WONG??
Sir don't bother explaining to them its better to allow the clown to run the country and destroy whatever is left of it so that China can have a free reinsurajisin?
That is what I am saying, you only push weaker people around. Indian army in 1962 was surely weak, hence you captured the land. Now is not the case, that is why you are not attacking and capturing Arunachal Pradesh, neither does India currently have the capacity to take back Aksai-Chin. By your same logic, India could wait for a couple of deaces to take back Aksai-Chin, long term object.
Again saying, talk about courage when you get control over Taiwan, until then you are nothing. SL hasn't been stopped by India to build a navy, its within international rules, so is China coming to Indian Ocean. And by the same logic, India investing in disputed (as by Chinese) waters with Vietnam.
Thats the difference between a communist regime and democracy, we do not earn money by polishing someone, we do it just because we like it.
India has got enough tangible results to force China to align hundreds of missiles towards India. If India was a cakewalk, China would have done that long ago.
As for the 'game' we are aware of the Chinese preferences. Dialogue has never been your forte.
Like I said, China will never go to war with India. China's economy is export oriented. The strategic reserve that you talk about is strategic in nature. It won't be released to MAERSK for instance to carry out their transports. Your military will be supplied, not the huuuuge merchant fleet.
Also, China has no friend other than Pakistan, but only business partners.
Sir don't bother explaining to them its better to allow the clown to run the country and destroy whatever is left of it so that China can have a free rein
What tangible result? none of country that India cozy with has detered China from adventuring into Indian Ocean or stoping our economic corridor project with Pakistan. And why we need to aligned hundred missile toward India when water can do a better costless job...LMAO. India has not fear of Chinese missiles but fear of the dependancy of our water policy.
We dialogue with words to some people and dialogue with Iron fist with other.
If we ever go to war with India, we're ready to trade few Chinese merchant ships being sunk by Indian navy over hundred millions of dehydrated Indians...and not to mention that our Navy will sit Idlely...I guess it will be a fair deal.
LOL brother, our submarine fleet is around 60, including around 10 nuclear submarines.
Whereas according to India itself, they only have 7 active diesel-electric submarines.
India can currently deploy only 7-8 submarines against enemy forces - The Times of India
Imagine trying to blockade China when our submarine fleet alone outnumbers all of India's submarines and major surface combatants (destroyers + frigates) combined!
And that's not even counting our surface fleet, which again outnumbers all of India's major surface combatants and submarines combined.
Lol India claimed to be weak in 1962? that was not in Nerhu's mind, he though that after we got out of famine we were too weak to challenge India. As for South Tibet why we bother to attack when we're alreay control the fate of millions of these people, the day we tightening the water valve, these people will be in chaotic and become a distabilized factor to India, we can alway playing this card later. As for Aksai Chin, you can wait a couple of decades if you want, the best it wait until our western part such Tibet, Xinjiang are fully developped as our coastal cities then come to settle some score with us.
As for Taiwan, If Indian gorverment has the courage to defy China by saying Taiwan is independant country than we will show you our courage to take it back, until then we're doing nothing while milking US and India with trade surplus at the mean time. The difference between China and India over SL and Vietnam, is that we have the courage to warn India directly on it face regarding the oil exploration in dispute area, while India can only mumbling about our Sub in SL port.
And i lol'ed about Indian democracy, that Indian's famous ultimate argument, you don't earn money because your Indian democracy gorverment can't afford to nourrish it own people properly let along to pay you, so you can claim to do it just becaue you like...I guess 50 cents troller payed by CCP is better than nothing from Indian counterpart.
Oh Yeah? How about this:They will cry like little girl again looking for help as 1962 when Nerhu seeking help from Kennedy after learning that Indian Army got overrun by PLA. As Today not only our navy outnumber them but if we ever deploy DF-21D from Tibet, we can virtually sink any Indian ship anchor to port, Indian combattant ships will just be a turkey shoot with no place to hide.
Oh Yeah? How about this:
India fires a couple of conventionally tipped Agni-V missiles, no need of even nuclear tipped, on your Three Gorges Dam! Just imagine the destruction!! It will be the single largest ruin on Earth! I am leaving upto your creative imagination to assess the damage.
Good Bye.
So your claim on Taiwan is dependent on Indian government's viewpoint? A core issue is not determined by external factors. And China can only give warnings to India, which has been rebuffed again and again, By giving out warnings China is more courageous??
Ofcourse Indian Army was weak in 1962 thanks to Nehru and we criticize India's one of the greatest leaders for that unlike you CCP slaves who have to follow their masters' diktats and treat Mao as a leader, whose policy was solely responsible for Great Leap Forward's huge human cost, that too in MILLIONS!
And yes, India is still developing, but Indian government doesn't force us to polish them around, we criticize them when they go wrong. We are not SLAVES like you.
Check the sources, India's estimated nuclear arsenal is only a total of 1 megaton. Mostly comprised of 20kt fission devices.
Whereas even one SINGLE Chinese thermonuclear warhead is over 4 megatons, each. That means one single Chinese nuke has more destructive power than India's entire arsenal.
India also has a geography problem (their heartland in the Ganges river delta is right next to the Chinese border), and they also have to save at least half their nukes for Pakistan, who will no doubt join in to finish off India in such a scenario.
That's why the Indian Army itself said: "India cannot hope to match China by any conventional or non-conventional means, and the gap is growing larger every day".
Seems you are a little uneducated here. The important thing is population density of a country. More than 90% of your population is crammed on your eastern side. Compare that to India's population density. India doesn't require that number of bombs because 90% of your population can be covered by a smaller number of bombs. India has the required number of bombs to make an effective retaliation.
Do you know the yield of the bomb dropped at Hiroshima and Nagasaki? 15 and 20 kt. It is enough to destroy the city and hence serve the purpose. Any more is just ego boost and waste of money.
Regarding the public announcements, do you remember that after Cope India 2004, USAF went to Congress and said Indians are close to them? Do you really believe that? It was just a stint to win fundings. Do not get carried away by what military professionals say in public, you will be deceived.
Look at Indian population density map and the Chinese one. Rest of your post is plain blabber.Not quite sure about your statement about the population density, you have virtually the same population as our but much less territory. if you want to play nuke with China, you will become an extinction specie.