What's new

PM Imran says 'establishment' gave him three options: resignation, no-confidence vote or elections

PM Imran says 'establishment' gave him three options: resignation, no-confidence vote or elections

Dawn.comPublished April 1, 2022 - Updated about 2 hours ago

Prime Minister Imran Khan during an interview to ARY News. Photo courtesy ARY News

Prime Minister Imran Khan during an interview to ARY News. Photo courtesy ARY News

Prime Minister Imran Khan revealed on Friday that the "establishment" had given him three options: "resignation, no-confidence [vote] or elections", following the filing of a no-confidence motion against him in the National Assembly.

He shared this during an interview to ARY News, which was aired on Friday, while responding to questions about whether the opposition, government or "another party" had proposed early elections and his resignation as options.

The premier said when he was presented with the three options, "We said elections is the best option, I cannot even think about resigning and as far as the no-confidence vote is concerned, I believe in fighting till the end."

Pointing out that several members of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf had defected to the opposition ahead of the no-trust vote, the premier explained that even if the opposition's no-trust move failed, "We cannot run the government with such people (defectors)."

So, he said, "it will be better for Pakistan if we hold elections again."

Asked whether he was prepared to go for early elections, he replied, "If we win [in] this [no-confidence] vote, it is a very good idea to go for early elections."

To a question about what would the government's strategy be in case the opposition's no-trust motion fails, he answered, "We will make a strategy [in the coming days]."

'There's threat to my life'​

Earlier in the interview, the premier said there was a threat to his life, claiming that those conspiring to topple his government were "scared knowing that even if he is ousted, the public will continue to support him".

"I am saying this openly that there is a threat to my life," he said.

"They, all those who have colluded [against me], know that I will not sit silently," the prime minister went on, adding, "What do they think? They will spend Rs20 billion, Rs25 billion and topple my government and I will watch silently?"

"This is why I am saying openly, there is a threat to my life."

The prime minister's statement comes hours after Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry said a plot to assassinate Prime Minister Imran Khan had been reported by security agencies.

Earlier this week, PTI leader Faisal Vawda had made similar claims, stating that a conspiracy was being hatched to assassinate the prime minister over his refusal to "sell the country".

Vawda had made the remarks on ARY News show "Off the Record" in response to a question about a letter PM Imran brandished at the PTI's March 27 power show in Islamabad, claiming it contained "evidence of a "foreign conspiracy" to topple his government.

He said there was a threat to the prime minister's life but remained evasive when asked whether the purported conspiracy to assassinate the premier was mentioned in the letter.

When PM Imran Khan confirmed this in his interview, he said his life was under threat because he did not suit those involved in the conspiracy as well as "people like Shehbaz Sharif, who polishes boots" and "are slaves to money".
The premier added that people like PML-N President Shehbaz had no public support.

Without naming anyone, he continued, "They are afraid of people who have public support. They are talking about assassination because they know that if he (PM Imran) is ousted from the government, he will still be relevant because the public is with him."

"Then they go for the other option. Look at the history," PM Imran said, adding that "they will try their best through local collaborators, the three stooges" — a term he uses to refer to Shehbaz, PPP co-chair Asif Ali Zardari and Pakistan Democratic Movement chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman.

The prime minister further claimed that a campaign would also be initiated for his "character assassination", adding that his wife, Bushra Bibi, and one of her associates named Farah would also be targeted.

'Knew about the conspiracy since Aug'​

Earlier in the interview, the prime minister revealed that he was aware of the "conspiracy" being hatched to oust his government since August last year.

"I had an idea since August and I also knew that planning was ongoing in London," he said, adding that he had also informed his cabinet back then that the coming "winter would be a very difficult time for us".

He said he also had reports from agencies in this regard, as he went to name PML-N supremo as one of the persons involved in the conspiracy.

"He (Nawaz Sharif) was meeting people, people like Hussain Haqqani [...] who was involved in memogate. They were in constant touch," he alleged, claiming that Nawaz had held the last meeting in this regard on March 3. "And we received this document (a letter he claims has evidence of a foreign conspiracy to topple his government) on March 7."

The prime minister went on to say that people who had colluded in this purported conspiracy were also against the Pakistan Army, adding that "Pakistan has been surviving because of its army."

"And Nawaz Sharif and his daughter have openly railed against the army," he remarked.

The prime minister further alleged that the joint opposition was making efforts to oust his government in order to get an NRO (amnesty).

"But I will never give them an NRO," he expressed his resolve.

Moreover, he said "external powers" needed "robbers and thugs ... and the corrupt who become their slaves to save their corruption".

He further claimed that the "threat letter" said if Imran Khan was ousted through the no-confidence vote, the foreign powers involved in the conspiracy would "forgive Pakistan".

"But if he survives the no-confidence vote, there will be dire consequences for Pakistan and we will isolate Imran Khan," he added. "How do they know that the new government will work [well] with them? ... This means that they had a connection with them (opposition). This means that this conspiracy is being hatched for the past six months."

He went on to say that some PTI members who had defected, people from the opposition and media persons had been meeting with officials at "embassies".

"I had all the reports," he said.

To a question about whether his recent visits to China and Russia had "fast-paced the process of regime change against him", he compared Pakistan's foreign policy to that of India.

"During the Cold War between America and the Soviet Union, they (India) remained non-aligned. They were close to the Soviet Union" but they still maintained ties with the US.

"And because of their (India's) foreign policy, see how is the Indian passport respected in comparison to Pakistan's," he added. "When you are a self-respecting nation, others respect you as well. But we continued to change blocs," he lamented.

He further lambasted the previous governments for allowing drone attacks in the country during America's war on terror.

'No differences on ISI chief's appointment'​

In response to a question about civil-military relations with respect to "an appointment in October" — which was an apparent reference to the appointment of a new Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) director general — the prime minister said, "We were all on one page. We had no differences"

He said he had no issues with the military leadership unlike past leaders, who were "scared of the army because of their corruption".

When the anchorperson specifically named the former ISI chief, Gen Faiz Hameed, asking whether the premier wanted him to continue as the spymaster because he was his favourite, PM Imran said he had worked with Gen Faiz for three years and he knew that the winter of 2021 winter "will the most difficult time for us".

Citing economic difficulties and the situation in Afghanistan after the US exit, he said "I was insisting on him (Gen Faiz) continuing till winter as he was experienced".

"They had their own view, which was that there was a system in the army. They had their own perspective and I had mine. But I wasn’t thinking about who will be the new army chief," he clarified.

He also denied reports that he intended to de-notify Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa as the army chief and said it was "the PML-N's disinformation campaign".


Meanwhile the Establishment has approached media houses and presented their version as well, which is going directly against the Prime Minister's.

 
.
Let me tell you in no other country does such an incompetent and corrupt opposition exist who can't even speak properly, have cases on their heads and are out on bail. This is not a democracy, this is a takeover. Atleast present someone competent, its the same faces :lol:

You allow this then you are most definitely a joke of a nation and will deserve the humiliation to come.
 
.
Personally, I still think if the letter mentions the time of NCV, this should ring alarm bells for the establishment to take action. This is my wish they should act to make this NCV unsuccessful because surely even they can see the other side has the same people who have plundered the resources and who have corruption cases against every one of them. They tried to be neutral it seems and if now they were to make the so-called "calls" everyone will know Bajwa once again helped IK. But i hope they do make those calls.
If the establishment ever cared about resources being plundered and economy going to hell, they would have never given that egregious NRO. What is to come is kids stuff compared to what the establishment has done in the past...
 
. .
Let me tell you in no other country does such an incompetent and corrupt opposition exist who can't even speak properly, have cases on their heads and are out on bail. This is not a democracy, this is a takeover. Atleast present someone competent, its the same faces :lol:

You allow this then you are most definitely a joke of a nation and will deserve the humiliation to come.

Jo imaandaar banda hota hai, us ki awaaz mein garaj hoti hai, us ki awaaz ki alag hi taseer hoti hai

Look at the clowns and their body language, their body shivers, tongue stutters when they speak
 
.
. .
Establishment especially Bajwa regime is at the centre of vote of no confidence.
They couldn’t take international pressure and had to get rid of Khan
Bajwa's role is "resistivity neutral" in this episode. Not sure why? Is he trying to earn some brownie points from Americans for his post retirement benefits?
 
.
Bajwa's role is "resistivity neutral" in this episode. Not sure why? Is he trying to earn some brownie points from Americans for his post retirement benefits?

Its time the army grew a moral conscience because they will be soon be faced with a decision on which province to back once the opposition balkanize it.

Diesel - KPK

Sharif family - Punjab

Zardari family - Sindh

Bugti - Balochistan

FATA merges with Afg.

Kashmir is lost to India.

Are all the generals going to get on their first class flight out to the US to live happily ever after?
 
.
Help me understand here.

Why didnt they bring 3 options to the opposition?

All of them have serious cases against them. Killers are being brought in from dubai to vote and racist anti Pakistanis like ali wazir are being escorted by sindh govt. Heavy horse trading is being done. Convicted criminals are running Sindh.

Anti army rhetoric of PMLN is so obvious, but Imran Khan is being given 3 choices.
 
.
Establishment is giving them three options, two of which are coming from Opposition. “New elections” is their own addition as they know it’s impossible and simply adding it for damage control. Some members claim Army shouldn’t interfere in political matters, then why has NSC labelled it a Foreign Conspiracy against Pakistan? On one hand we are telling the world we are being conspired against and on the other hand, our security agencies are claiming neutrality? We clearly know where our establishment stand. And it’s not about PTI but Pakistan.
 
.
See this: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/inte...-over-risks-of-political-rivals-clash.738833/

It does not take a rocket scientist to see the ominous national security implications arising out of the current issues. The military's job is to secure Pakistan from both "external" AND "internal" threats. No two ways about this.
Military's national security implications are confined to it's own power projection within the country, budget allocations and personal finances and investments...it could care less about territorial or economic sovereignty of the country.
 
.
Help me understand here.

Why didnt they bring 3 options to the opposition?

All of them have serious cases against them. Killers are being brought in from dubai to vote and racist anti Pakistanis like ali wazir are being escorted by sindh govt. Heavy horse trading is being done. Convicted criminals are running Sindh.

Anti army rhetoric of PMLN is so obvious, but Imran Khan is being given 3 choices.
What’s more ridiculous is that we called it a foreign funded regime change and even named the country officially as we summoned American Charge De Affairs. But permitted the NCM to go as planned. Why cry to the Americans if we are permitting the NCM to continue as normal and allow the opposition to come to power. Today three anchors on ARY categorically stated military’s role in this whole NCM drama and even warned them of how it’s not in their best interest.
 
.
See this: https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/inte...-over-risks-of-political-rivals-clash.738833/

It does not take a rocket scientist to see the ominous national security implications arising out of the current issues. The military's job is to secure Pakistan from both "external" AND "internal" threats. No two ways about this.

Hope I am as coherent as you are to explain my view.

Establishments around the world india, US, UK in particular resist anti establishment individuals or parties to take power. In US, trump was resisted and now they have an old hand. In india modi is getting unprecedented support, in UK Jeremy corbyn was sidelined as a joke.

They do this so civil-military or establishment/civil divide does not emerge which presents the country as chronically unstable.

Pakistani establishment is perhaps the only establishment that wants to either directly oust or play no part in actually defending its pro establishment govt from foreign and domestic anti army elements.

The actual target of the foreign hand is Pak military establishment. The goal is to blunt their military capabilities by continuously keeping them in war with their own govt while india asserts domination.
 
.
2 big points are being missed, let's look at it from the establishment/elite point of view.

1st
Nawaz Sharif might have big differences with the military and establishment but Asif Ali Zardari and Shabaz Sharif have maintained good level connections with them. Ppp is happy as long as they have Sindh and Shabaz Sharif is happy to become the next PM, even during Nawaz Sharif anti establishment campaign, Shabaz Sharif tried to maintain a balance, he tried to tell Nawaz Sharif to not attack the military and establishment but badde Mian would not listen, Ch Nisar a senior leader also disagreed with Nawaz Sharif.

2nd
If the threats are genuine then the west must have informed the Pakistani elite/establishment that you will also be dealt with like Russia(target their assets abroad). This alone would scare them off and they would give a go ahead to PMLN to take IK off and bring in pro west government of PMLN.

Think about it, what can the establishment benefit with IK in power, the retired elite assets will be targeted in the west, Pakistan would be blacklisted, this will bring Pakistan down to its knees, we will suffer economically.

Can IK offer a plan for Pakistan to survive. Will the anti west camp invest in Pakistan? Will they buy our exports? Will they sell us oil and gas at a good rate. Will they guarantee Pakistan will not be isolated and it will suffer?
38%+ of our exports are to the west.
30B of our remittes come from outside.
What can be the solution to this?
 
.
2 big points are being missed, let's look at it from the establishment/elite point of view.

1st
Nawaz Sharif might have big differences with the military and establishment but Asif Ali Zardari and Shabaz Sharif have maintained good level connections with them. Ppp is happy as long as they have Sindh and Shabaz Sharif is happy to become the next PM, even during Nawaz Sharif anti establishment campaign, Shabaz Sharif tried to maintain a balance, he tried to tell Nawaz Sharif to not attack the military and establishment but badde Mian would not listen, Ch Nisar a senior leader also disagreed with Nawaz Sharif.

2nd
If the threats are genuine then the west must have informed the Pakistani elite/establishment that you will also be dealt with like Russia(target their assets abroad). This alone would scare them off and they would give a go ahead to PMLN to take IK off and bring in pro west government of PMLN.

Think about it, what can the establishment benefit with IK in power, the retired elite assets will be targeted in the west, Pakistan would be blacklisted, this will bring Pakistan down to its knees, we will suffer economically.

Can IK offer a plan for Pakistan to survive. Will the anti west camp invest in Pakistan? Will they buy our exports? Will they sell us oil and gas at a good rate. Will they guarantee Pakistan will not be isolated and it will suffer?
38%+ of our exports are to the west.
30B of our remittes come from outside.
What can be the solution to this?

The west is not bringing PMLN and PPP for a party. They will demand a price and the price is keeping Pak military under constant pressure and continue with civil mil divide.

The west has made its mind that india is a natural leader of S.A and Pakistan must either accept is or prepare for consequences.

If Pakistan military is ok with being humiliated like they were with memo gate, dawn leaks, pathan kot fir, ajmal kasab admission by nawaz sharif, General Zaheer ul Islam's being directly accused of murdering Hamid Mir on national tv and much more than who are we to blame.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom