Champion_Usmani
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2018
- Messages
- 4,022
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In normal circumstances...yes but IK's problem is that his govt has slim majority both in center and Punjab and on top of the that, the cheapo cheap CJP is creating hurdles for his govt. Now if he can't appoint an IG...how can you expect him to control the situation. What messages does it give to the bureaucracy that basically PM has no powers and real center of power the judiciary?The best time to make unpopular choices is soon after winning an election. If you do your bit right, in 5 years time, nobody remembers them because you have so many positive things you can talk about.
His dharnas were all about pushing state institutions to do their jobs and act against people who seemed to be committing crimes with impunity. Once the supreme court announced that they would take up the case, he stopped his dharnas.Really? Have you forgotten the dharnas already?
Are you serious?
The woman at the centre of this situation was locked up and tried for 'apparently' saying something. If it was a free country nothing like the current situation would have even happened. Or is it a free country as long as you are a muslim?
No way should instigating murder by allowed as free speech and you will find that it is a crime to incite hatred in most Western countries. The mullah trying to get people killed should be arrested immediately.
If you'd paid attention to his speech, you would have noticed that he is not suppressing protest. He is admonishing them for lying about the CJ and COAS. And he is warning them against causing damage to life, livelihood and property.Then why suppress the present protests?
If you'd paid attention to his speech, you would have noticed that he is not suppressing protest. He is admonishing them for lying about the CJ and COAS. And he is warning them against causing damage to life, livelihood and property.
His dharnas were all about pushing state institutions to do their jobs and act against people who seemed to be committing crimes with impunity. Once the supreme court announced that they would take up the case, he stopped his dharnas.
An unbiased observer would have no trouble telling the difference.So what do you think what happened in his dharnas? Was that any different?
An unbiased observer would have no trouble telling the difference.
Oh right. What is sauce for the goose .......
The tactics that he employed previously will now all be used against him, sadly.