PM approves grant for construction of Hindu temple in Islamabad

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

What is the harm in building a hindu temple. Are we going to act like bigots on the other side of the border?

Opposition is out of ammo and need to pick a new hand, so here they play "Islam is in danger" card.

A tiny mandir in an overwhelming and overzealous young, educated, firm 97% Muslim population is no threat at all.

 

[notorious_eagle]

I as a Pakistani citizen, strongly oppose this move. 1 million muslims were killed by hindus and sikhs and more are being killed everyday and yet there is no partition monument to remember their sacrifice? But this mandir is being constructed.

If they had to do politics on this religious issue, why not build a large church for our christian minority who didn't kill a million muslims and in fact serve with loyalty in our armed forces.

The Khan govt ministers could have called ambassadors of christian countries and people like Brigadier (r) Samson if they wanted a photo op.

So how are the Pakistani Hindus responsible for what is happening in India? By all means tell me, are they the ones directing Modi to carry out his genocide against the Indian Muslims?

I as a citizen of Pakistan fully support this. Pakistan as a country belongs equally to Hindus, Christians, Sikhs and Muslims. We are the majority, thus we occupy the positions of power. It is our responsibility to ensure that we make our Hindu Brothers/Sisters comfortable in Pakistan and ensure that they have adequate resources to live a peaceful life and also practice their religion.

 

[Imad.Khan]

wow, kiya qom hai yah.

Some people claiming Islam is in danger if this temple is built.
Some claim that Hindus killed Muslims during Partition so we should not build this temple
Some claim that as Indian Hindus are killing Indian Muslims so we should not allow religious freedom to Pakistani Hindus.

I want to ask all these bigots some simple question.

1. Why is its that Islam is never in danger when Pakistani Muslims steal, do corruption, add poisonous stuff in foods, commit fraud, or use religion to harm innocent people?
2. Were these Hindus even alive to commit those atrocities during Partition?
3. Is it moral to harm someone for the crimes of someone else? Is it even allowed in our religion?

Alot of these people need to educate themselves in the religion that they supposedly follow. Just by praying namaz alone isn't enough.

To start off, please read the first Pact that the prophet PBUH did with the non-Muslims in Madinah.

https://www.oic-iphrc.org/en/data/docs/studies/851193.pdf

 

[Ahmet Pasha]

Coming up next Grand Masonic Lodge no. 420. Grand master Imran Khan.
High priestess Pinky Peerni.

@El Sidd

 

[shah_123]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1278419272952434688

 

[I.R.A]

Instead going with the usual prevalent stupidity in government circles the government could have appealed to the general public to fund, Pakistanis have been asked to finance the dams and COVID-19 and floods and earthquakes and what not. No one would raise any objections no one would question and lots of future troubles could have been avoided. People did contribute for Thar so I am sure people would have donated for this as well.

This cheap publicity stunt is going to come bite this gormint ...... just wait and watch when and if you ever in future try talking about Medressas or aukaf or mosque or even the moon sighting. Stupidity in Pakistan has a face now and its IK and his favorite chailay.

 

[Imad.Khan]

For all the illiterates full of hatred please check this video and hopefully you will understand.

If you don't agree with the guy that made this country then i suggest that you go and live with ISIS. Pakistan is not for you.

 

[Yaseen1]

it reminds me mughal leader akbar who instead of focusing on governance started focusing on pleasing minorities and devised new religion where he promoted mandirs and it eventually lead to dominance of hindu culture in india which forced and caused Muslims financially weak when british invaded india and put Muslim in to disadvantage and turned them to minority and now we are seeing 7 times bigger india as compared to Pakistan.So called religious scholars like Ghamdi who believe on death of Hazrat Esa A.S and not believe on any Hadees not represents whole Muslims sentiment

 

[Imad.Khan]

it reminds me mughal leader akbar who instead of focusing on governance started focusing on pleasing minorities and devised new religion where he promoted mandirs and it eventually lead to dominance of hindu culture in india which forced and caused Muslims financially weak when british invaded india and put Muslim in to disadvantage and turned them to minority and now we are seeing 7 times bigger india as compared to Pakistan.So called religious scholars like Ghamdi who believe on death of Hazrat Esa A.S and not believe on any Hadees not represents whole Muslims sentiment

Let me get this straight, are you implying that because of Akbar that there are more Hindus in India than Muslims?

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1278419272952434688

@Pan-Islamic-Pakistan

 

[Yaseen1]

Akbar promoted belief that everyone is right whether he is hindu,Muslim or any other religion so whatever religion you follow you are on similar right path,this belief promotes conversions to hinduism in region where hindu culture was dominant originally before Muslims entered india

Let me get this straight, are you implying that because of Akbar that there are more Hindus in India than Muslims?

 

[m52k85]

Meanwhile, Lal Chand Malhi said the Hindu population in Islamabad had reached to around 3,000, which included government employees, private sector employees, members of the business community and a large number of doctors.

“Now when we have families here, there is a need for a crematorium, a place for collective prayers and marriage ceremonies,” Mr Chaudhry said, adding that “currently, we hold Holi and Diwali functions in government’s community halls or marquee.”

Pakistani Hindus are still Pakistanis and deserve to practice their religion freely.

Yes and like minority communities everywhere, masjids in UK, US, Canada and else built from community funds not taxpayer's money. You get what you pay for, if you cann't collect funds for a big temple, make a small one. Here in UK where the community is small they would even rent a basement and make a small musalah. "Chadar dekh kar paon pehlana" english: "stretching ones legs looking at the span of their blanket".

For all the illiterates full of hatred please check this video and hopefully you will understand.

View attachment 647518 View attachment 647520 View attachment 647521

If you don't agree with the guy that made this country then i suggest that you go and live with ISIS. Pakistan is not for you.

Is this the best you can do, get Ghamdi to say that the state should contribute funds? Can you get a wider consensus? Scholars/ preachers that represent more of Pakistan.

wow, kiya qom hai yah.

Some people claiming Islam is in danger if this temple is built.
Some claim that Hindus killed Muslims during Partition so we should not build this temple
Some claim that as Indian Hindus are killing Indian Muslims so we should not allow religious freedom to Pakistani Hindus.

I want to ask all these bigots some simple question.

1. Why is its that Islam is never in danger when Pakistani Muslims steal, do corruption, add poisonous stuff in foods, commit fraud, or use religion to harm innocent people?
2. Were these Hindus even alive to commit those atrocities during Partition?
3. Is it moral to harm someone for the crimes of someone else? Is it even allowed in our religion?

Alot of these people need to educate themselves in the religion that they supposedly follow. Just by praying namaz alone isn't enough.

To start off, please read the first Pact that the prophet PBUH did with the non-Muslims in Madinah.

https://www.oic-iphrc.org/en/data/docs/studies/851193.pdf

I see it as two problems here, both stand distinct, its easy to convince the majority regarding the first, I don't see how one could justify the second:
Problem 1: Right to make your place of worship in Pakistan.
Problem 2: Right to have government pay to make said place of worship.

Opposition is out of ammo and need to pick a new hand, so here they play "Islam is in danger" card.

A tiny mandir in an overwhelming and overzealous young, educated, firm 97% Muslim population is no threat at all.

Please get out opposition/ government mode on this, somethings are just not done, you don't pick up funds from the coffers of a muslim country to fund the thing that is top of the list that Allah hates, shirk.

Correct it will not make us all bigots, but do you agree someone who maters most will not be happy?

@SecularNationalist my dear the quote from Quadi-e-Azam in your signature is from before he realized to the contrary, what do you suppose he advocated the two nation theory on? Doesn't take brilliance to see that.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

Who is stopping them from building Temple from their own money?

Does Pakistan government build mosques or are they constructed with private money?

 

[m52k85]

Does Pakistan government build mosques or are they constructed with private money?

The vast majority by private money. The ones in government offices, compounds I guess would be by gov money.

 

[Imad.Khan]

Is this the best you can do, get Ghamdi to say that the state should contribute funds? Can you get a wider consensus? Scholars/ preachers that represent more of Pakistan.

Did you listen to the whole video or just that particular portion? You can provide a rebuttal if you like, i will be more than happy if your logic is sound. As for scholars thar represent more of Pakistan, who would that be? Mulla diesal or mulla Pan de siri?

Don't mix up words, there are two problems here, both stand distinct, the majority dont have a problem with the first, the majority have a problem with the second:
Problem 1: Right to make your place of worship in Pakistan.
Problem 2: Right to have government pay to make said place of worship.

What words have i mixed up? Not sure if you read the thread from start but there are alot of people that have the problem even with the first one.

As for the 2nd problem that you mentioned, i agree the project should be self funded and not tax-payers money. Its the same here in Australia. Only land allocation should be allowed. However if the govt wants to provide the funds as a loan, that would also be agreeable.