Plight of Rohingyas in India

[pothead]

The Hindus of Jammu can be replaced with Rohingya people.

We can replace muslims of Pakistan with Rohigyas. That would be a much better solution.

 

[manlion]

They are closer to Bangladesh

Bangalesh is closer to India than Pakistan , plus Myanmar shares a long border with India Rohingyas speak Hindiáns Indo-European language.
.... world supa pawa cant feed 40,000 refugees ? Bangladesh has 1.3 m Rohingyas, Malaysia 150,000.

Rohingya refugees

Bangladesh 1,300,000+ (March 2018)[3]

Saudi Arabia 500,000 (October 2017)[4]

Myanmar ~400,000 (November 2017)[5]

Pakistan 350,000 (October 2017)[6]

Malaysia 150,000 (October 2017)[7]

UAE 50,000 (December 2017)[8]

India 40,000 (September 2017)[9][10]

 

[suresh1773]

The Hindus of Jammu can be replaced with Rohingya people.

Where will Hindus go, is it Burma. What about yr family members who migrated from East Pakistan in 1972 to India,first send them back and then talk of replacement.

 

[itachii]

Bangalesh is closer to India than Pakistan , plus Myanmar shares a long border with India Rohingyas speak Hindiáns Indo-European language.
.... world supa pawa cant feed 40,000 refugees ? Bangladesh has 1.3 m Rohingyas, Malaysia 150,000.

Rohingya refugees

Bangladesh 1,300,000+ (March 2018)[3]

Saudi Arabia 500,000 (October 2017)[4]

Myanmar ~400,000 (November 2017)[5]

Pakistan 350,000 (October 2017)[6]

Malaysia 150,000 (October 2017)[7]

UAE 50,000 (December 2017)[8]

India 40,000 (September 2017)[9][10]

Seriously ? They are settling in chennai too.. For someone who posts 100's of threads on hindi imposition I want to know your views accomodating them in chennai ?

Where will Hindus go, is it Burma. What about yr family members who migrated from East Pakistan in 1972 to India,first send them back and then talk of replacement.

Stop being nice or talk him sense bro... He is radicalized with an isis mindset thinking that the world is made only for muslims but is too scared to express it in his real life... Let him spourt as much zealot shit as he wants, the day he starts crossing red lime NIA will come knocking his door to take care of zealot ***.

 

[manlion]

Seriously ? They are settling in chennai too.. For someone who posts 100's of threads on hindi imposition I want to know your views accomodating them in chennai ?

they pose no threat to Tamil, the ones that need to be kicked out are blood sucking Marwadis, exploitive Gujjus and rapists pani puri vendors from cow belts states. In the long run, unlike northies with their entitlement mentality , Rohingyas should be able to integrate with locals especially Tamil muslims

Good that Tamilnadu govt is looking after them, much better than India

When the Rohingyas settled down in Kelambakkam they numbered only 14, but as the news spread that they have a permanent home, others joined them and today they number 94.

The refugees live in a ground plus one shelter known as ’round building’ indicating its circular shape. While six families live on ground floor, eight are on the first floor and five have put up shacks on open ground around the building.

Electricity bill is borne by the government and water is available throughout the day. The shelter is opposite the local Government Primary Health Centre where they can get medical assistance. There is a local school nearby where their children go for studying.

In the shelter there is a mosque in a makeshift hut that is separate from the living area. Here, they offer prayer five times every day. The local Muslims are lending a helping hand to the refugees and so are some NGOs, and philanthropists who are showing their magnanimity towards them.

The refugees, many of whom are skilled workers do odd jobs including rag picking, daily wage laborer, shoe polishing etc. to eke out a living. Some of them even though have specific set skills like driving can’t do so without having license.

The UNCHR is a pillar of strength to the Rohingas refugees in Chenai. It maintains cordial relations with the Department of Immigration and government of India

The Chennai office of the UNHCR is confident that as and when validity of the refugee card expires, they could easily get them extended. According to UNCHR, Rohingas can peacefully live here till such atmosphere is created in their home country.

https://countercurrents.org/2017/09/23/a-peep-into-rohingya-refugee-life-in-chennai/

This shows Tamils support for Rogingyas

Tamils have experienced dharmic religions terrorism

We can replace muslims of Pakistan with Rohigyas. That would be a much better solution.

India pop - 1.3 Billion adding a few thousands makes no difference

 

[pothead]

they pose no threat to Tamil,

Huh, why should we allow these dastardly people in our state?
You are not a Tamil, you are not one of us, so, don't speak for us.

We know who u are and what u are.

Take Rohigyas and settle them in your country. Don't want them in my state or my country.

 

[manlion]

Huh, why should we allow these dastardly people in our state?
You are not a Tamil, you are not one of us, so, don't speak for us.

We know who u are and what u are.

Take Rohigyas and settle them in your country. Don't want them in my state or my country.

neither are you a Tamil.

Tamilnadu supports Rohingyas and condemns the genocide of Rohingyas by dharmic terrorist forces.

no Burmese Tamil will forget what Myanmar did to them, India never lifted a finger to help them

The Burmese Indians who never went home
BBC News, Manipur state

Indians lived in Burma for centuries, but large-scale migration took place during British-colonial rule, when the country was part of British India, during the 19th and early 20th centuries. They were used as civil servants, traders, farmers, labourers and artisans - and came to be considered the backbone of the economy.

Burmese nationalists always viewed them with suspicion and there were a series of anti-Indian riots in the 1930s. Once the British left in 1948, Indian-origin people became increasingly vulnerable and they were swiftly forced to leave following the 1962 coup.

They found it difficult to settle in India, so many decided to return to Burma by land. They vaguely knew that India's north-eastern states of Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh shared a border with Burma.

After weeks of travelling by train and bus a small group managed to reach Moreh, around 3,200km (2,000 miles) by road from Tamil Nadu. When they reached the border crossing, Burmese soldiers prevented them from entering the country.

The Tamils settled in Moreh hoping one day to return to their homeland - but those dreams have never been fulfilled.

 

[pothead]

neither are you a Tamil.

huh, from Vellore buddy.

Went to CMC few times to get stiches.
Right in front of CMC is my favourite Dhaba where I have Kulchas and Baingan ka Bhartha.
Just outside of that there is a tandoori guy whom I used to frequently visit.

Once I even swam in the moat of Vellore fort.

You are not even an indian, let alone South one.

I know exactly what you are

 

[Crixus]

No the Rohingya women are not safe in these camps , that’s why we are requesting them to leave India they can go anywhere but India .

Indian govt should get rid of these Rohingya shite on priority basis

Indians are the scum of the earth. Hopefully the women in those refugee camps will be safe from the rapists. The sooner those refugees get out of there the safer they will be

They are not Indians , It’s better we spend the resources we are spending on them to Indians who are poor as a tax payer I don’t want these people here .

due to geographical and cultural reasons, Rohingyas are closer to India than to Pakistan , hence they are at home in India which is /was their original country .

We have no responsibility towards any refugee we are not signatory to give refuge to anyone , we are largest democracy for Indians , we are secular for Indians . We can’t limited resources on some refugees we have enough poor Indians to serve first

You have a social responsibility to host refugees. You are supposed to be a secular nation and the largest democracy on earth. Your claim not mine. You are also one of the most developing nations in Sth Asia and you ought to accept your responsibilities with your growth.

**Edit. Indians on PDF and not generally Indians are scum of the world



Nope. India is. And you can't do anything about it since your government has better sense than you. Hopefully Indian media will ensure that the refugees are afforded their basic human right necessities ...at the expense of your taxes

 

[manlion]

huh, from Vellore buddy.

Went to CMC few times to get stiches.
Right in front of CMC is my favourite Dhaba where I have Kulchas and Baingan ka Bhartha.
Just outside of that there is a tandoori guy whom I used to frequently visit.

Once I even swam in the moat of Vellore fort.

You are not even an indian, let alone South one.

I know exactly what you are

going to Vellore and to evangelist funded Christian Missionary Hospital ? Are you really a Hindu or a under cover Christian ?

Eat in dhaba ? Tandoori ? huh thats very Tamil ....

We have no responsibility towards any refugee we are not signatory to give refuge to anyone , we are largest democracy for Indians , we are secular for Indians . We can’t limited resources on some refugees we have enough poor Indians to serve first

UNHCR: India bound by law not to deport Rohingyas

The Union government took the plea that as India is not a signatory to the Refugee Convention of 1951 or the Protocol of 1967.

Express News Service
KOLKATA: In its affidavit to the Supreme Court on the question of deportation of Rohingya refugees to Myanmar, the Union government took the plea that as India is not a signatory to the Refugee Convention of 1951 or the Protocol of 1967, it is not bound by the principle of 'non-refoulement' or not sending back refugees to a place where they face danger.

However, this does not wash with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The rights body says New Delhi is bound by international law to protect refugees who face danger in their home country.

In an e-mail reply to the New Indian Express, the UNHCR's India headquarters in New Delhi said: "The principle of non-refoulement is considered part of customary international law and therefore binding on all states whether they have signed the Refugee Convention or not. In addition, India is party to major international human rights instruments such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and Convention on the Rights of the Child."

 

[Crixus]

India is not signatory of UNHR and the Rohingyas entered India illegally ..........

http://www.unhcr.org/4cd96e919.pdf

We can and should kicked them out ...its better we spend the resources on poor Indians then on Rohingyas .... My question is why not these swines go their Umma contries then coming to India

going to Vellore and to evangelist funded Christian Missionary Hospital ? Are you really a Hindu or a under cover Christian ?

Eat in dhaba ? Tandoori ? huh thats very Tamil ....

UNHCR: India bound by law not to deport Rohingyas

The Union government took the plea that as India is not a signatory to the Refugee Convention of 1951 or the Protocol of 1967.

Express News Service
KOLKATA: In its affidavit to the Supreme Court on the question of deportation of Rohingya refugees to Myanmar, the Union government took the plea that as India is not a signatory to the Refugee Convention of 1951 or the Protocol of 1967, it is not bound by the principle of 'non-refoulement' or not sending back refugees to a place where they face danger.

However, this does not wash with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The rights body says New Delhi is bound by international law to protect refugees who face danger in their home country.

In an e-mail reply to the New Indian Express, the UNHCR's India headquarters in New Delhi said: "The principle of non-refoulement is considered part of customary international law and therefore binding on all states whether they have signed the Refugee Convention or not. In addition, India is party to major international human rights instruments such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and Convention on the Rights of the Child."

 

[Doctor Strange]

I think they chose this route to cross the Pakistan border and for Muslim dominated Kashmir. But stuck in this area due to Pakistan India tension. Safe route should opened for them for border cross. Or should be sent to WB state. BD could easily accommodate 40 thousand more as 1.3 millions are already here. But that will give India excuse to excuse Bengali speaking Muslim citizens of India to BD. So BD is cautious with Rohingya refugees of India. Hindus of NW India crossed all limits inhumanity. Burning there shelter to stopping water, electricity, medical supplies. I wont mind if these people are absorbed through ghar wapasi and given higher status, innocent lives should be saved. Apart from this religious opium bs they are people of wider North Indian belt, its just a fact.

 

[Crixus]

Like your spirit take them back they are causing security problem here

I think they chose this route to cross the Pakistan border and for Muslim dominated Kashmir. But stuck in this area due to Pakistan India tension. Safe route should opened for them for border cross. Or should be sent to WB state. BD could easily accommodate 40 thousand more as 1.3 millions are already here. But that will give India excuse to excuse Bengali speaking Muslim citizens of India to BD. So BD is cautious with Rohingya refugees of India. Hindus of NW India crossed all limits inhumanity. Burning there shelter to stopping water, electricity, medical supplies. I wont mind if these people are absorbed through ghar wapasi and given higher status, innocent lives should be saved. Apart from this religious opium bs they are people of wider North Indian belt, its just a fact.

 

[pothead]

going to Vellore and to evangelist funded Christian Missionary Hospital ? Are you really a Hindu or a under cover Christian ?

Eat in dhaba ? Tandoori ? huh thats very Tamil ....

Diverting?

I am a Kadu, do you even know what that means?

I am an Indian first
Then a Hindu
Then a South Indian.

We don't want any Rohigyas either in TN or any place in India.
They should just GTFO.

 

[manlion]

Diverting?

I am a Kadu, do you even know what that means?

I am an Indian first
Then a Hindu
Then a South Indian.

We don't want any Rohigyas either in TN or any place in India.
They should just GTFO.

Kuruba, you have not answered by question ? Indian, Hindu, South Indian, these designations are subjected to change , they were given by your CMC missionary masters.

Tamilnadu has no problem with Rohingyas and no Tamil is complaining. They are provided free education, housing and health care and Tamilnadu should do more to help them settle and integrate in Tamilnadu . Unlike Hindiáns in TN , most Rohingyas especially the kids learn and speak Tamil, watch clip @ 05:50. When they grow up they will contribute to Tamil unlike the illiterate rapist pani puri walas from cow belt states