Plight of Rohingyas in India

[Politico]

Indians are the scum of the earth. Hopefully the women in those refugee camps will be safe from the rapists. The sooner those refugees get out of there the safer they will be

 

[Shankranthi]

Indians are the scum of the earth. Hopefully the women in those refugee camps will be safe from the rapists. The sooner those refugees get out of there the safer they will be

Sure, so is pakistan taking them in or is UK ?

 

[manlion]

Sure, so is pakistan taking them in or is UK ?

due to geographical and cultural reasons, Rohingyas are closer to India than to Pakistan , hence they are at home in India which is /was their original country .

 

[Shankranthi]

due to geographical and cultural reasons, Rohingyas are closer to India than to Pakistan , hence they are at home in India which is /was their original country .

LOL...how convenient.

 

[Soumitra]

Indians are the scum of the earth. Hopefully the women in those refugee camps will be safe from the rapists. The sooner those refugees get out of there the safer they will be

Yes, we are the scum of the earth. No Muslim is safe in India. So please tell me why are they flooding our country. there are 200 other countries they can go to. around 60 Islamic nations are there. One is right next door to India.

Let all these refugees go anywhere but India. We will be very happy.

 

[Politico]

Yes, we are the scum of the earth. No Muslim is safe in India. So please tell me why are they flooding our country. there are 200 other countries they can go to. around 60 Islamic nations are there. One is right next door to India.

Let all these refugees go anywhere but India. We will be very happy.

You have a social responsibility to host refugees. You are supposed to be a secular nation and the largest democracy on earth. Your claim not mine. You are also one of the most developing nations in Sth Asia and you ought to accept your responsibilities with your growth.

**Edit. Indians on PDF and not generally Indians are scum of the world

Sure, so is pakistan taking them in or is UK ?

Nope. India is. And you can't do anything about it since your government has better sense than you. Hopefully Indian media will ensure that the refugees are afforded their basic human right necessities ...at the expense of your taxes

 

[Shankranthi]

Nope. India is. And you can't do anything about it since your government has better sense than you. Hopefully Indian media will ensure that the refugees are afforded their basic human right necessities ...at the expense of your taxes

Govt. wanted to throw them out, the SC intervened and now the case is in the SC. Meanwhile we will just have to burn down the houses of these refugees to make them want to go back.

 

[Soumitra]

ou have a social responsibility to host refugees. You are supposed to be a secular nation and the largest democracy on earth. Your claim not mine. You are also one of the most developing nations in Sth Asia and you ought to accept your responsibilities with your growth.

Yes, we are all this. But the govt also has a responsibility of preventing terrorists from coming into India. that is greater than any other social, political and democratic responsibility. Like I said earlier even if 99.9% of the 40,000 refugees are not potential terrorists we can't take chance with 40 potential terrorists.

We are ready to take Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Christian refugees and even giving them an option of citizenship.

Pakistan claims to be an Islamic Nation. Islam is supposed to be a benevolent religion. You have a concept of Ummah where you claim to care for the Muslim Brotherhood. If you say you are overburdened by Afghan refugees we respect you for that. But then there are 60 other Islamic nations. And most of them have enough resources to be able to help these unfortunate refugees. They will also be happy living with their co-religionists

 

[Shankranthi]

Yes, we are all this. But the govt also has a responsibility of preventing terrorists from coming into India. that is greater than any other social, political and democratic responsibility. Like I said earlier even if 99.9% of the 40,000 refugees are not potential terrorists we can't take chance with 40 potential terrorists.

We are ready to take Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Christian refugees and even giving them an option of citizenship.

Pakistan claims to be an Islamic Nation. Islam is supposed to be a benevolent religion. You have a concept of Ummah where you claim to care for the Muslim Brotherhood. If you say you are overburdened by Afghan refugees we respect you for that. But then there are 60 other Islamic nations. And most of them have enough resources to be able to help these unfortunate refugees. They will also be happy living with their co-religionists

On a more serious note, India needs to sign some agreements with Afghanistan to take all of the Rohingyas refugees in exchange for all the money we have given them.

Its a win win situation. Afghanistan has been depopupulated due to war. This way, they can replenish their genetic pool as well as take in muslim refugees and get some goodwill from the muslim world.

 

[Soumitra]

On a more serious note, India needs to sign some agreements with Afghanistan to take all of the Rohingyas refugees in exchange for all the money we have given them.

Its a win win situation. Afghanistan has been depopupulated due to war. This way, they can replenish their genetic pool as well as take in muslim refugees and get some goodwill from the muslim world.

Sorry that wont work. Afghans themselves are refugees in Pakistan.

The Rohingya problem has to be resolved by the Muslim nations or the"liberal" nations of Europe. India should not be dragged into this

 

[Shankranthi]

Sorry that wont work. Afghans themselves are refugees in Pakistan.

The Rohingya problem has to be resolved by the Muslim nations or the"liberal" nations of Europe. India should not be dragged into this

There are safe parts in Afghanistan. Either way, its easier to achieve than pushing them back into Myanmar.

There is no muslim nation who is willing to take them. India is already dragged into this. Its already too late. Now its time to resolve this issue with innovative thinking.

Fly them to kabul and give them Rs. 1,00,000 each to settle down there. It will still be cheaper than housing them in India.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

The Hindus of Jammu can be replaced with Rohingya people.

There are safe parts in Afghanistan. Either way, its easier to achieve than pushing them back into Myanmar.

There is no muslim nation who is willing to take them. India is already dragged into this. Its already too late. Now its time to resolve this issue with innovative thinking.

Fly them to kabul and give them Rs. 1,00,000 each to settle down there. It will still be cheaper than housing them in India.

Modi has not done anything against them. Instead he has started quoting our Prophet SAW.

 

[Shankranthi]

The Hindus of Jammu can be replaced with Rohingya people.

Modi has not done anything against them. Instead he has started quoting our Prophet SAW.

LOL....All of which is true

 

[suresh1773]

due to geographical and cultural reasons, Rohingyas are closer to India than to Pakistan , hence they are at home in India which is /was their original country .

They are closer to Bangladesh

 

[Novice09]

Kick them back to Myanmar or the Indian ocean! Those ingrates should be thanking the stars they are even alive. Why couldn't Myanmar first seal their Western border before dealing with the Rohingyas?

What our government was doing??? They are now spread all over in India... They are here to create mess and we are trying to find ways to push them out... sick...

The Hindus of Jammu can be replaced with Rohingya people.


Modi has not done anything against them. Instead he has started quoting our Prophet SAW.

Literally... kuch BHI...

Well that is the problem... you want to replace not accommodate... that is why their a$$ has been kicked by Buddhists... Hindus are still most tolerant when it comes to other religion and faiths...