What's new

PLA expert says China will not be a military rival to US for at least 50 years

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
When a US expert predicted that China’s military will surpass the US by 2025, well-known Chinese military expert Major General Yin Zhuo said that China’s military strength will not be a rival to the US even 50 years from now, let alone 5 or 10 years.

Why?

The US will keep its huge navy to fight wars all over the world and remain world leader for 100 years as has been claimed by US president Obama. It will maintain a huge navy with 11 aircraft carriers, 14 ballistic missile nuclear submarines and 50 plus attack nuclear submarines.

China, on the other hand, has no intention whatsoever to become world leader or seek world hegemony. What interest will China have in maintaining an equal navy? Therefore, China will be no match to the US even in 50 years time.

Therefore, if the US maintains such a huge navy to be world leader for 100 years, China will never surpass the US.

In an interview, former PLA navy (PLAN) political commissar Admiral Liu Xiaogang said China would build six homegrown aircraft carriers. Current PLAN deputy political commissar Rear Admiral Ding Haichun, however, said nothing about that in the same interview.

PLAN, in its own interest, certainly wants to grow as huge as possible, but does China really need such a huge navy?

I believe that China has no intention to be world leader as the leadership means only a heavy burden without any benefit.

However, will China grow militarily stronger through its current arms race with the US?

Certainly, China will, as is detailed in Chan Kai Yee’s book “Space Era Strategy: The Way China Beats the US.”

However, China began the arms race to surpass the US because of the US pivot to Asia aiming at joining Japan or rival South China Sea claimants in China’s maritime territorial disputes.

Hu Jintao had a strategy for wiping out the enemy at sea. Due to that strategy, China will soon acquire the capabilities to wipe out its enemy at sea by achieving air supremacy with its stealth fighter jets and saturation attack on an enemy navy with anti-ship ballistic and cruise missiles.

Hu Jintao’s strategy is good, but China will be defeated by the US even if it wipes out the part of the US navy near its coast, because the US can easily cut China’s trade lifelines due to its navy’s dominance of the oceans.

What is the next strategy developed by Xi Jinping for China?

It is the strategy to build up China’s capabilities to defend China’s trade lifelines. For that Xi has urged the Chinese air force to acquire integrated space and air capabilities for both attack and defence. With such capabilities, China will be able to attack US fleets at high sea to prevent them from cutting China’s trade lifelines.

In Chan’s book, it is described how an aerospace bomber can kill an aircraft carrier battle group in minutes. Such an aerospace bomber will be one of the weapons in Xi’s integrated space and air capabilities for both attack and defence. When China has developed a fleet of aerospace bombers armed with hypersonic missiles, the US will no longer be able to cut China’s trade lifelines.

The missile from the bomber will fly at a hypersonic speed of Mach 23 that no missile defence so far can intercept.

As an alternative, China can develop a strategic nuclear bomber with the speed of Mach 3.6. With the bomber’s speed of Mach 3.6, a missile from it may have a hypersonic speed of Mach 7.6 if its own speed of Mach 4 (achievable now) is added to the speed of the bomber. That will ensure that 100 to 200 missiles from the bomber will be able to wipe out an entire aircraft carrier battle group.

Ukraine have developed a huge aircraft with a payload of 250 tons, and with China’s high temperature gas-cooled nuclear reactor, China may have such a bomber within a decade.

China develops such capabilities entirely aimed at defence against US attack, instead of replacing the US as world leader.

Therefore, Major General Yin’s prediction remains correct that China will not have the military capabilities to be a rival to the US even if China were able to defeat US attack.

China will not have thousands of nuclear warheads for first nuclear strike. China will not have a huge navy to dominate the world.

If Chinese leaders remain as wise as Xi Jinping, that will be the case even if China grows much stronger than the US economically

PLA expert says China will not be a military rival to US for at least 50 years | China Daily Mail
 
.
Major General Yin Zhuo said that China’s military strength will not be a rival to the US even 50 years? At this point does anyone think that the U.S. would not have advanced further by another 50 years?

In other words, China will never ever be able to catch up with the U.S. Period!
 
.
Major General Yin Zhuo said that China’s military strength will not be a rival to the US even 50 years? At this point does anyone think that the U.S. would not have advanced further by another 50 years?

In other words, China will never ever be able to catch up with the U.S. Period!

they dont need to , they got Enough Nukes , to stop any aggression .... China will catch up with them in Economic term very soon ... thats what matter in future ..
 
.
No, it will take a hundred years. The expert is wrong.

And before China, there is India to rival the US. We are busy with other stuff.

Ma-11.jpg
 
.
they dont need to , they got Enough Nukes , to stop any aggression .... China will catch up with them in Economic term very soon ... thats what matter in future ..
I agree. It's the economy where China would be able to catch up and even surpass the U.S. by 2050 or so.
 
.
I agree. It's the economy where China would be able to catch up and even surpass the U.S. by 2050 or so.

thanks to Nuke Technology, there is power balance , next super power will rule the world by its Money power not military ...
world largest and most advance armies even failed to remove the threat of terrorism in 13-14 years .. forget about invading a country like , China , Russia , India , Pakistan , Japan , France , UK , Germany and others ...
 
.
When a US expert predicted that China’s military will surpass the US by 2025, well-known Chinese military expert Major General Yin Zhuo said that China’s military strength will not be a rival to the US even 50 years from now, let alone 5 or 10 years.

Why?

The US will keep its huge navy to fight wars all over the world and remain world leader for 100 years as has been claimed by US president Obama. It will maintain a huge navy with 11 aircraft carriers, 14 ballistic missile nuclear submarines and 50 plus attack nuclear submarines.

China, on the other hand, has no intention whatsoever to become world leader or seek world hegemony. What interest will China have in maintaining an equal navy? Therefore, China will be no match to the US even in 50 years time.

Therefore, if the US maintains such a huge navy to be world leader for 100 years, China will never surpass the US.

In an interview, former PLA navy (PLAN) political commissar Admiral Liu Xiaogang said China would build six homegrown aircraft carriers. Current PLAN deputy political commissar Rear Admiral Ding Haichun, however, said nothing about that in the same interview.

PLAN, in its own interest, certainly wants to grow as huge as possible, but does China really need such a huge navy?

I believe that China has no intention to be world leader as the leadership means only a heavy burden without any benefit.

However, will China grow militarily stronger through its current arms race with the US?

Certainly, China will, as is detailed in Chan Kai Yee’s book “Space Era Strategy: The Way China Beats the US.”

However, China began the arms race to surpass the US because of the US pivot to Asia aiming at joining Japan or rival South China Sea claimants in China’s maritime territorial disputes.

Hu Jintao had a strategy for wiping out the enemy at sea. Due to that strategy, China will soon acquire the capabilities to wipe out its enemy at sea by achieving air supremacy with its stealth fighter jets and saturation attack on an enemy navy with anti-ship ballistic and cruise missiles.

Hu Jintao’s strategy is good, but China will be defeated by the US even if it wipes out the part of the US navy near its coast, because the US can easily cut China’s trade lifelines due to its navy’s dominance of the oceans.

What is the next strategy developed by Xi Jinping for China?

It is the strategy to build up China’s capabilities to defend China’s trade lifelines. For that Xi has urged the Chinese air force to acquire integrated space and air capabilities for both attack and defence. With such capabilities, China will be able to attack US fleets at high sea to prevent them from cutting China’s trade lifelines.

In Chan’s book, it is described how an aerospace bomber can kill an aircraft carrier battle group in minutes. Such an aerospace bomber will be one of the weapons in Xi’s integrated space and air capabilities for both attack and defence. When China has developed a fleet of aerospace bombers armed with hypersonic missiles, the US will no longer be able to cut China’s trade lifelines.

The missile from the bomber will fly at a hypersonic speed of Mach 23 that no missile defence so far can intercept.

As an alternative, China can develop a strategic nuclear bomber with the speed of Mach 3.6. With the bomber’s speed of Mach 3.6, a missile from it may have a hypersonic speed of Mach 7.6 if its own speed of Mach 4 (achievable now) is added to the speed of the bomber. That will ensure that 100 to 200 missiles from the bomber will be able to wipe out an entire aircraft carrier battle group.

Ukraine have developed a huge aircraft with a payload of 250 tons, and with China’s high temperature gas-cooled nuclear reactor, China may have such a bomber within a decade.

China develops such capabilities entirely aimed at defence against US attack, instead of replacing the US as world leader.

Therefore, Major General Yin’s prediction remains correct that China will not have the military capabilities to be a rival to the US even if China were able to defeat US attack.

China will not have thousands of nuclear warheads for first nuclear strike. China will not have a huge navy to dominate the world.

If Chinese leaders remain as wise as Xi Jinping, that will be the case even if China grows much stronger than the US economically

PLA expert says China will not be a military rival to US for at least 50 years | China Daily Mail
Sun Tzu policy being adopted. "When u r near, make enemy believe u r far and when u r far, make him believe u r near"
 
.
When a lion roars, you won't mistake it for a mouse. Don't mess with China. We are a big and powerful country.
 
.
Major General Yin Zhuo said that China’s military strength will not be a rival to the US even 50 years? At this point does anyone think that the U.S. would not have advanced further by another 50 years?

In other words, China will never ever be able to catch up with the U.S. Period!

he said "if the US can maintain this level of investment and keep the current number of warships, china cannot rival the US in 50 years. thats a big if
 
.
he said "if the US can maintain this level of investment and keep the current number of warships, china cannot rival the US in 50 years. thats a big if

Besides who wants to rival the US? We just make sure we protect our interests and keep the nation safe.

Policing the world and fighting ISIS is a particular US duty.

Maybe India needs a bigger army because it has a lot of separatist movements as well as JK.
 
.
Besides who wants to rival the US? We just make sure we protect our interests and keep the nation safe.

Policing the world and fighting ISIS is a particular US duty.

Maybe India needs a bigger army because it has a lot of separatist movements as well as JK.
agreed. china cannot follow the US's war mongering. china just need a military that can defend itself from anyone and protect its interests.
 
.
No, it will take a hundred years. The expert is wrong.

And before China, there is India to rival the US. We are busy with other stuff.

Ma-11.jpg

That quote looks surprisingly familiar
& if you don't want our members to retaliate please don't drag us in
 
. . .
Who the Hell wants to take over from America as the "world policeman"?

That sounds like a nightmare. Even America doesn't want that job.

Chinese power will be used to serve Chinese interests only. And to secure our own sovereignty.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom