What's new

Pictures & Video of the Three Z-10 Helicopters to Pakistan - updated

LWRs and MAWS

WUW8tBE.jpg


27_72068_810f7402514c6b0.jpg
 
.
@Beast does the WZ-10 have a MMW radar? @cabatli_53 is there any news about upgrading the t129s engine or its operational range and service ceiling?
 
. . .
There is plan to do that and they have tested on WZ-9G helo but so far no further news.
That great, by the looks of it the extra time they are talking means they are making a better variant for WZ-10.
 
. .
Lacking of excuse and claim comprehension problem? First of all, we gift pakistan 3 gunship is not for testing reliabilities or whether the system we claim will work or not.

I am sure PA will not risk any of their pilot with a trial or invalidate product for war mission. I am sure the high level of PA are more understanding and comprehend that a keyboard warrior staying abroad. They are sure of WZ-10 before making the choice or to convince their decision of procuring more.

You don't understand .. Nobody just gets 3 choppers .. They are followed by more deliveries or sales ... And yes it woul also help China in upgrading/improving etc the helis ..

Il give you an example .. We bought the SLC-2 Arty locating radars .. The arty guys discovered shortfalls .. they got in touch with the Chinese defence guys and gave them their updates,suggestions etc .. Thus the SLC-2 radars were upgraded/improved and their short comings resolved .. Win win for both sides!

Hey, China presents you the better chance of ToT than any other country. I doubt Turkey can do that.
Turks also offered 3 helis (free) & with co production.

Current Cobra that PA has doesn't have night vision capability?
They do they were upgraded long ago with a deal worth 65+ million $.
 
Last edited:
. .
But compared with the Apache,WZ10 and even the LCH it has lesser range and service ceiling, so once again are there any plans to improve them?

Keep Apache out of consideration but What makes you think Atak stays behind of Z-10 in terms of service ceiling ? Why should Turkiye need to improve T-129 Since Atak is known as one of the BEST attack helicopter in terms of high/hot and power to weight ratio in its class ?
 
.
For some reasons, China should eliminate Z-10's wings curve style on body for just straight line?

wz-10_1.jpg



Just use old fashioned wings to carry missiles like below.

Apache 64
military-helicopters-vehicles-AH-64-Apache-_4782-50.jpg


T-129
T-129-1001-FAR14-3651.JPG


8049fef9-6777-4181-9fewstx.jpg
 
. .
Like what I said before, some overboard Pakistani really got brainwashed by the western propaganda badly. Learn your country's history first. It's not the first time China send Pakistan free military hardware. And Pakistan is not the only country that China supply them with free military hardware. It's never been about business. No county in this planet will send you 3 free helos to use them in real combat just for business. If you believe that, you are a true retard.

And valuable data? What valuable data? And which can only be obtained in Pakistan's battle zone? Hehe. People like you just enjoy to make things up. I hope not all Pakistani will believe this kind of shit.

Finally, I hope all of us can cherish our relationship between Pakistan and China, which has been existed for many decades and been reinforced by mutual support for millions of times. It's not based on business at all.
First of all, enjoy the negative rating for calling me a retard. Next, no country does anything for free. Both sides have made it clear, these three helis are in Pakistan for testing and evaluation, they're not free. It's part of a process that every nation goes through, when they want to acquire a certain product or system. By the way, three helis aren't gonna make much of a difference, I find I ironic you're calling me a retard and making such useless comments.

Every military industry uses data from conflict zones where their military hardware is used. Why do you think the US got to where it is? Or Russia?

Calling me brainwashed won't change facts.

Why? what is wrong with them?
Can you step in here and tell atlantis_cn and beast to stop bothering me? If they have an opinion, they really need to stop with the name calling.
 
.
ignore the internet generals. if Pak forces didn't have confidence in them, they would not have accepted them in the first place.

Why can't some of you being more gratitude instead of arrogant? The only reason China sent these for free is because the country who asked for it is Pakistan. China may very well give them to Afghanistan, Iraq, a dozen of African countries to gain the so called battle experience and I'm sure they will handle these helo with great delight and thankfulness. But no, only to Pakistan China send these for free. Can the fact tell you something?

Besides, if you have no confidence in a weapon, you will not send it into a battle field. It equals suicide.
 
. . .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom