What's new

Philippine Nuclear Ambitions

Bataan Nuclear Power Plant is using light water reactor, there is no way it can producing any materials to made nuclear weapons
 
.
Bataan Nuclear Power Plant is using light water reactor, there is no way it can producing any materials to made nuclear weapons

But light water reactors uses Uranium-235 as nuclear fuel, and "enriching" the spent Uranium-235 can be used to make a small nuke (given the know-how to make a nuke is available).

Still, even in the 1980s, any nuclear enrichment technology would be very expensive for the Philippines, and could have negative political consequences aside from possibly making the Philippines a nice target for a nuke strike in the old Cold War days.
 
.
But light water reactors uses Uranium-235 as nuclear fuel, and "enriching" the spent Uranium-235 can be used to make a small nuke (given the know-how to make a nuke is available).

Still, even in the 1980s, any nuclear enrichment technology would be very expensive for the Philippines, and could have negative political consequences aside from possibly making the Philippines a nice target for a nuke strike in the old Cold War days.

I doubt if Philiphines would't have intercontinental capability, tactical nukes are fine as last resort of defense and could be used as an EMP too.
 
.
I doubt if Philiphines would't have intercontinental capability, tactical nukes are fine as last resort of defense and could be used as an EMP too.

The idea of tactical nukes as last resort defense is probably the idea of the supposed nuclear weapons program attempt according to the news article.

Besides, if the PH government tries or plans to build one, we would be likely kicked out of ASEAN.
 
. .
"Others" here don't have to worry because the PH constitution prohibits it, we don't have the technology, resources and the know-how to build one, we don't have the political will to do so, and political corruption and bickering prevents it. :coffee:
 
Last edited:
.
"Others" here don't have to worry because the PH constitution prohibits it, we don't have the technology, resources and the know-how to build one, we don't have the political will to do so, and political corruption and bickering prevents it. :coffee:

Well in few decades will have it but again not a good idea i'm all for nuclear energy not nuclear weapons its stupid weapons system even for a deterrent because everyone wants one and it will just take 100 nukes to destroy detonated anywhere the globe everything according to scientist estimates but if you ask me my arbitrary guess it will just take 40 nukes detonated anywhere can destroy the planet.

but again its mot and academic now the old goat is just asking for attention as we say KSP
 
.
So your government official stance is be jerk to all ? Thanks for the clarification! This typical of you 50cent trolls you talk and taunt and make stupid post and when you back to connor you try this tactic of trying to be a nice guy tactic why not be truthful for once you people are forever closet cowards despicable tactics and what worse you people don't even read the topic discussion you just flood the thread with nonsense until people call you out and then you play this tactic again again forever cowards.
:rofl::rofl::rofl:

WHY can't you accept my peacefulness?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom