Philippine Court clears way for bigger U.S. military role

[Cossack25A1]

If China was really as strong as USA and behaved like USA, with so many deploy of nukes in Philippines, it would be enough for China to issue Nuke war threats to Philippines.

Nuke threats? More like you have already nuked us, specially if Mao or any Chinese PDF member is the one who has his/their finger on the button.

 

[seven7seven]

I agree. Syria is pathetic to let Iran and Russia occupy their country.

The difference between Syria and Philippines is that Syria is getting help from Allies when in time of war and repelling Western-backed terrorists, hell-bent on regime change. On the other hand, Philippines is opening its legs up, like a Manila street hooker, to US troops, during peacetime.

 

[Cossack25A1]

Yes. Try to claim that Mao killed 3 billion Chinese. Demonizing Mao of China is just like demonizing Mohamed of Islam. This is just the competition of civilization trying to demonize the leader of other civilization.

Are you now getting offended? Remember, you called us Filipinos "stupid" in your older posts.

 

[Abacin]

If China-USA relation degrades into the level of Russia-USA relation, you should expect some kinds of wars. China, USA and Russia doesn't pile up Nukes for fun.

Are you now getting offended? Remember, you called us Filipinos "stupid" in your older posts.

No. It just shows your ignorance. Rivals' ignorance is my fortune.

That's why I am expecting more and more Chinese gains in SCS.

 

[Cossack25A1]

Your Child! China have no first attack policy since Mao. China was the first one to promise no attack on non-nuclear countries. USA has never had these policies.

Let the American members and a few answer that assumption of yours.

@Oldman1 @anon45 @F-22Raptor @James Jaevid @jhungary @gambit

 

[Abacin]

If philippines are so ignorant, it will be Chinese fortune. Even if USA is very strong, it is bad to have a piggy teammate.

 

[Cossack25A1]

If China-USA relation degrades into the level of Russia-USA relation, you should expect some kinds of wars. China, USA and Russia doesn't pile up Nukes for fun.


No. It just shows your ignorance. Rivals' ignorance is my fortune.

That's why I am expecting more and more Chinese gains in SCS.

You also show ignorance about my country; you could post anything about my country's history but you will never understand us Filipinos. The fact that you cannot comprehend why we Filipinos are protesting against your aggressive claims in that sea region show your ignorance.

And now you are acting as if you are someone that acts "high and mighty".

If philippines are so ignorant, it will be Chinese fortune. Even if USA is very strong, it is bad to have a piggy teammate.

Yes, yes, making fortune from other people's misery. I guess that is what Mao Though had thought you... or maybe that is how the Chinese really think.

 

[Zero_wing]

hypocrisy at its highest

 

[Abacin]

China is a strong force near Philippines for thousands of years and has never thought to colonize Philippines, Philippines kept conducting chinese massacres and now think that Chinese are genocidal. Both Japan and USA colonized you. You think that they are your best friends.

 

[jhungary]

Unless you have a reading problem since when did I agree to debate these issues with a troll like you.

Didn't I make it clear to you that I will not waste my time responding to any troll right from the beginning?

Then what are you doing here?

I was merely highlighted "The Annexation of Hawaii" as an example of your BS and justifying why I should not be wasting any time with the rest of your BS.

Why should I waste my time and bother myself to respond to the rest of the BS when you invented e.g. when you declare the narrow "The Strait of Malacca" which encroached right into both Malaysia and Indonesia 12NM sea borders as international waterway and according to you both these nations have NO RIGHT even to demand for prior information before passing.

But I must say you are pretty THICK-SKINNED.

LOL, you are a bit nonsense. It was not me who said Malacca Strait is an International Waterway, it was as defined by UNCLOS.

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA

Legal status of waters forming straits used for international navigation

1. The regime of passage through straits used for international navigation established in this Part shall not in other respects affect the legal status of the waters forming such straits or the exercise by the States bordering the straits of their sovereignty or jurisdiction over such waters and their air space, bed and subsoil.

2. The sovereignty or jurisdiction of the States bordering the straits is exercised subject to this Part and to other rules of international law.

SECTION 2. TRANSIT PASSAGE

Article37

Scope of this section

This section applies to straits which are used for international navigation between one part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone and another part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone.

Article38

Right of transit passage

1. In straits referred to in article 37, all ships and aircraft enjoy the right of transit passage, which shall not be impeded; except that, if the strait is formed by an island of a State bordering the strait and its mainland, transit passage shall not apply if there exists seaward of the island a route through the high seas or through an exclusive economic zone of similar convenience with respect to navigational and hydrographical characteristics.

2. Transit passage means the exercise in accordance with this Part of the freedom of navigation and overflight solely for the purpose of continuous and expeditious transit of the strait between one part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone and another part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone. However, the requirement of continuous and expeditious transit does not preclude passage through the strait for the purpose of entering, leaving or returning from a State bordering the strait, subject to the conditions of entry to that State.

3. Any activity which is not an exercise of the right of transit passage through a strait remains subject to the other applicable provisions of this Convention.

A strait is an international waterway regardless on how narrow it was, but I reckon a troll like you don't know what is international law.

This is what I wrote @ #23 in quick response to you.

As for you. I am not wasting my time with a troll.

Example:

You claimed that USA bought Hawaii. How noble of USA but is it true.

To me, it is just your nature to lie and invent stuff based on my observation on what you wrote in all your other posts. That is why I never bother to waste my time with you so far.

The 1897 Petition Against the Annexation of Hawaii
Annexation of Hawaii | United States Imperialism

So according to this detractor claimed that USA bought Hawaii but from who?
Another thieving colonialists? When USA paid for the right to colony "Philippines" from Spain, USA signed the Treaty of Paris with Spain.

Today we know that France officially returned some of the artifacts stolen from China. (They were earlier on put up for auction earlier by the collectors)

Back to Hawaii.

Under this pressure, Liliʻuokalani abdicated her throne. The Queen's statement yielding authority, on January 17, 1893, pleaded for justice:
I Liliʻuokalani, by the Grace of God and under the Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom, Queen, do hereby solemnly protest against any and all acts done against myself and the Constitutional Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom by certain persons claiming to have established a Provisional Government of and for this Kingdom.
That I yield to the superior force of the United States of America whose Minister Plenipotentiary, His Excellency John L. Stevens, has caused United States troops to be landed at Honolulu and declared that he would support the Provisional Government.

Now to avoid any collision of armed forces, and perhaps the loss of life, I do this under protest and impelled by said force yield my authority until such time as the Government of the United States shall, upon facts being presented to it, undo the action of its representatives and reinstate me in the authority which I claim as the Constitutional Sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands.

lol you are funny. Trying to talk about American History to an American and what's more? the only mention is wikipedia

Did you know the Republic of Hawai'i was signed into effect before Queen Lili'uokalani abdicated her throne in 1893? And do you know by 1887, the King of Hawai'i were strip of all power before to so called "Annexation" which actually done by 120 US Marine? Now do tell me how a Company of marine annex an "independent" nation.

Hawai'i was long in the hand of American, British and French Businessman as far back to 1850. A fact even modern day Hawai'i Nationalist agrees on such fact. Yet a troll like you keep presenting the fact like US Government annexed Hawai'i out of no where.

One final question to you is do you even know what is the flag of the kingdom of Hawai'i? This is the flag of the kingdom of Hawai'i

Do you even know why the Union jack is on the flag of the disposed Kingdom of Hawai'i in both 1816 and 1843 version? For fun? Or maybe one day the King of Hawai'i saw the British Union jack and think to himself "This look good on my flag"?

But then what do people expect from a troll like you, beside calling other people name but dodging my question.

Your Child! China have no first attack policy since Mao. China was the first one to promise no attack on non-nuclear countries. USA has never had these policies.

So when was Vietnam Nuclear Powered? As I recalled, China was the one attack Vietnam in 1979. If China promise no attack on non-nuclear countries, then I guess Vietnam must be a nuclear power..

@Cossack25A1

 

[Cossack25A1]

So when was Vietnam Nuclear Powered? As I recalled, China was the one attack Vietnam in 1979. If China promise no attack on non-nuclear countries, then I guess Vietnam must be a nuclear power..

@Cossack25A1

The thing about the CCP is that they tend to "double-speak" - they will say something like "China is in peaceful rise" but their actions reveal otherwise. Even if they have a no first use policy, we have to remember that the PLA is the armed wing of the CCP and not exactly an "apolitical" armed forces.

And because of the CCP's double-speaking, it is hard to trust China in anything, including bilateral negotiations regarding the SCS issue because it will likely end in China's favor.

Man that Abacin is real nationalist adopate

Remember the term "double-speaking"; the PDF China Platoon will say they are "rational people" but the way of their thinking reveal otherwise.

 

[Signalian]

Philippines is a poor country and can use USA aid and help to grow.

 

[Zero_wing]

The thing about the CCP is that they tend to "double-speak" - they will say something like "China is in peaceful rise" but their actions reveal otherwise. Even if they have a no first use policy, we have to remember that the PLA is the armed wing of the CCP and not exactly an "apolitical" armed forces.

And because of the CCP's double-speaking, it is hard to trust China in anything, including bilateral negotiations regarding the SCS issue because it will likely end in China's favor.


Remember the term "double-speaking"; the PDF China Platoon will say they are "rational people" but the way of their thinking reveal otherwise.

More like revisionist nonsense man chinese massacre really? what type of drug is that guy smoking if that was true why do we have binondo and chinoys in the Philippines or myself as a filipino of chinese descent that moron as mouth with no idea what he's talking about. It's insulting to allow nonsense in the forum

Philippines is a poor country and can use USA aid and help to grow.

We are not a poor country get your facts straight

 

[Signalian]

We are not a poor country get your facts straight

The philipinos i worked with give a different picture than what you are trying to give.

 

[Cossack25A1]

More like revisionist nonsense man chinese massacre really? what type of drug is that guy smoking if that was true why do we have binondo and chinoys in the Philippines or myself as a filipino of chinese descent that moron as mouth with no idea what he's talking about. It's insulting to allow nonsense in the forum



We are not a poor country get your facts straight

He is likely referring the 1603 Sangley Rebellion.

Whether the Ming Dynasty has plans to influencing or controlling Spanish-controlled Philippines or not, then end result leaded to the deaths of a lot of Chinese. Thing is, if the Boxer Codex is to be believed - there is a sketch of what looks like a Ming-era Chinese General and many pre-Spanish Philippine socities were tributary states, there is a possibility that the Ming Dynasty had some sort of design to the Philippine islands.

The philipinos i worked with give a different picture than what you are trying to give.

Economically yes, we are not that wealthy.