What's new

Philippine Court clears way for bigger U.S. military role

Status
Not open for further replies.
Safety?Safety of everyone or only China's safety, because judging your military's action in that sea area, it is the latter.

Like I have said before, only China will benefit from her aggressive claims. And it doesn't mean that just because you have 5000 years of history equates to being a "right" to do everything without any repercussions.
When Soviet put missiles in Cuba, USA threated a Nuke war. Now USA even put nukes on 1st island chain, Chinese safety is exactly felt the same as USA at that time.
 
.
It is not gloom or doom. It is gain or loss. When you make mistakes, accept your responsibility and accept the loss. China and United States are on a major competition. China wants the safety on the 1st island chain while US wants hegemony to keep the 1st island chain. China is not Germany or Japan who bet its future on a single war. China is much more patiently. We are enjoying forward little by little. We can fight consistently for centuries. Chinese competition with Huns and Turks last for centuries and Chinese got the last win.

again your child you should not lecture us about history because you know nothing you talk about war as if its a game

It is because your Filipinos, Vietnamese and Japanese are filled with nationalisms. That's why you never understand how Mao thought is to China.

Wow talk about calling the kettle black
 
.
It is because your Filipinos, Vietnamese and Japanese are filled with nationalisms. That's why you never understand how Mao thought is to China.

And the Chinese are not filled with any sort of nationalism? You are really a freaking hypocrite; making one-sided accusations while being blind that your side is just as nationalistic as other countries' people.

You don't think that Mao Though doesn't instill any form of nationalism or loyalty to an ideology?
 
.
again your child you should not lecture us about history because you know nothing you talk about war as if its a game



Wow talk about calling the kettle black
If you were serious at war, then do not introduce more and more ammunition in your back yards. Unfortunately you are enjoying playing wars.
 
.
First, of 5 points I made, only one is remotely related to typo. You have not answer my point between Sovereign of Caribbean, Malaysia joining US Proliferation Security Initiative, Chinese rise in SCS forced Philippine with the US reapproachment. And My point of Malacca Strait is International Waterway, no, you did not address that but rather go with my last point of "warn" torn Libya...lol, and you are calling out "Distraction" tactics?

Unless you have a reading problem since when did I agree to debate these issues with a troll like you.

Didn't I make it clear to you that I will not waste my time responding to any troll right from the beginning?

I was merely highlighted "The Annexation of Hawaii" as an example of your BS and justifying why I should not be wasting any time with the rest of your BS.

Why should I waste my time and bother myself to respond to the rest of the BS when you invented e.g. when you declare the narrow "The Strait of Malacca" which encroached right into both Malaysia and Indonesia 12NM sea borders as international waterway and according to you both these nations have NO RIGHT even to demand for prior information before passing.

But I must say you are pretty THICK-SKINNED.

This is what I wrote @ #23 in quick response to you.

:nono: As for you. I am not wasting my time with a troll.

Example:

You claimed that USA bought Hawaii. How noble of USA but is it true.

To me, it is just your nature to lie and invent stuff based on my observation on what you wrote in all your other posts. That is why I never bother to waste my time with you so far.

The 1897 Petition Against the Annexation of Hawaii
Annexation of Hawaii | United States Imperialism


:sarcastic: So according to this detractor claimed that USA bought Hawaii but from who?
:nono: Another thieving colonialists? When USA paid for the right to colony "Philippines" from Spain, USA signed the Treaty of Paris with Spain.

Today we know that France officially returned some of the artifacts stolen from China. (They were earlier on put up for auction earlier by the collectors)

Back to Hawaii.

Under this pressure, Liliʻuokalani abdicated her throne. The Queen's statement yielding authority, on January 17, 1893, pleaded for justice:
I Liliʻuokalani, by the Grace of God and under the Constitution of the Hawaiian Kingdom, Queen, do hereby solemnly protest against any and all acts done against myself and the Constitutional Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom by certain persons claiming to have established a Provisional Government of and for this Kingdom.
That I yield to the superior force of the United States of America whose Minister Plenipotentiary, His Excellency John L. Stevens, has caused United States troops to be landed at Honolulu and declared that he would support the Provisional Government.
Now to avoid any collision of armed forces, and perhaps the loss of life, I do this under protest and impelled by said force yield my authority until such time as the Government of the United States shall, upon facts being presented to it, undo the action of its representatives and reinstate me in the authority which I claim as the Constitutional Sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands.
 
.
Like I have said before, only China will benefit from her aggressive claims. And it doesn't mean that just because you have 5000 years of history equates to being a "right" to do everything without any repercussions.
Unfortunately, if the PDF Chinese is any indicator, that is how collective China believes. The Chinese genuinely believes they are exceptionally unique. This is beyond nationalism and pride. The Chinese believes they have, not only the right, not merely 'a right', but THE right, to be the leader of all Asiatics. This transcends borders.
 
.
And the Chinese are not filled with any sort of nationalism? You are really a freaking hypocrite; making one-sided accusations while being blind that your side is just as nationalistic as other countries' people.

You don't think that Mao Though doesn't instill any form of nationalism or loyalty to an ideology?
If you go to read Bible, Kuran, Confucians or Mao Thoughts, all of them have very few nationalism. That's why they can be accepted by different countries and different ethnic groups. That's why they can help form civilization states instead of nation state.
 
.
It is not gloom or doom. It is gain or loss. When you make mistakes, accept your responsibility and accept the loss. China and United States are on a major competition. China wants the safety on the 1st island chain while US wants hegemony to keep the 1st island chain. China is not Germany or Japan who bet its future on a single war. China is much more patiently. We are enjoying forward little by little. We can fight consistently for centuries. Chinese competition with Huns and Turks last for centuries and Chinese got the last win.

wow after saying a stupid thing then being called for it and then its not what it looks theme classic case of hypocrisy child obviously your just trying to impose your point of view and its not working now you're just going around in circles just give it up child.
 
.
Unfortunately, if the PDF Chinese is any indicator, that is how collective China believes. The Chinese genuinely believes they are exceptionally unique. This is beyond nationalism and pride. The Chinese believes they have, not only the right, not merely 'a right', but THE right, to be the leader of all Asiatics. This transcends borders.
It is USA who thinks that they are exceptional. USA can put their defense line at Chinese borders well across pacific. But when China put our defense line just at SCS, USA thinks that it is not acceptable.
 
.
If you go to read Bible, Kuran, Confucians or Mao Thoughts, all of them have very few nationalism. That's why they can be accepted by different countries and different ethnic groups. That's why they can help form civilization states instead of nation state.

wow comparing mao to the word of god you did not just manage to be hypocritic bias and racist now you're both egocentric arrogant and sacrilegious too
 
.
If you go to read Bible, Kuran, Confucians or Mao Thoughts, all of them have very few nationalism. That's why they can be accepted by different countries and different ethnic groups. That's why they can help form civilization states instead of nation state.

Mao Though may not have much nationalistic tone, rather it is more of an ideology, an extreme form of ideology similar to Stalinism.
 
.
Unfortunately, if the PDF Chinese is any indicator, that is how collective China believes. The Chinese genuinely believes they are exceptionally unique. This is beyond nationalism and pride. The Chinese believes they have, not only the right, not merely 'a right', but THE right, to be the leader of all Asiatics. This transcends borders.

Unfortunately for level-headed members here, I use the PDF Chinese, along with other Chinese netizens as the sole indicator on my views about the Chinese, and from what I had encountered, my views about the Chinese are "gutter-level".
 
.
wow after saying a stupid thing then being called for it and then its not what it looks theme classic case of hypocrisy child obviously your just trying to impose your point of view and its not working now you're just going around in circles just give it up child.
You are really Childish. If Japan didn't accept their loss in WWII, more and more Nukes might be on Japan.
Philippines are playing nuke power fights childishly and think that other people are childish.
 
. .
If China was really as strong as USA and behaved like USA, with so many deploy of nukes in Philippines, it would be enough for China to issue Nuke war threats to Philippines.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom