Panama Case - Post Verdict Discussion and Updates

[AHMED85]

https://www.facebook.com/

 

[Solomon2]

...The only way to reverse the judgement is to provide a valid money earning trail which they don't have...

Why? If the prosecution couldn't provide valid proof of the Sharifs' ownership doesn't the money-earning trail become irrelevant?

And no, I'm not a "fan boy" of N.S. by any means.

 

[Shane]

If these objections are sustained on appeal I don't see why the judgment won't be reversed.

Yeah lets completely ignore the fact that the defense itself failed to provide any admissible proof at all but forged documents and lets talk about the stacks of evidence provided by prosecution and find fault with one or two, lol, very strong logic indeed.

I'm sure that the sun shall also rise from the west when the defense manages to prove its case in the absence of any proof of money trail or source of funds by the then dependents of the Convicted former PM and why they resorted to submit forged documents to prove their case in the Supreme Court of Pakistan, lol.

 

[AHMED85]

https://www.facebook.com/

 

[BHarwana]

Why? If the prosecution couldn't provide valid proof of the Sharifs' ownership doesn't the money-earning trail become irrelevant?

And no, I'm not a "fan boy" of N.S. by any means.

Nope the evidence against owner ship has been considered complete Sharif admitted it him self without any pressure.

 

[Shane]

Why? If the prosecution couldn't provide valid proof of the Sharifs' ownership doesn't the money-earning trail become irrelevant?

Yeah lets believe that Hussain, Hassan and Maryam Nawaz were born with a money bag attached to their proverbial and that was their source of accumulating all the assets in their name when they were dependents of Nawaz Sharif. Simply Sublime.

 

[Solomon2]

Yeah lets completely ignore the fact that the defense itself failed to provide any admissible proof at all -

If the Sharifs didn't own Avenfield the case falls apart.

but forged documents -

Yes, that avenue could have been strongly pursued with less chance of a successful appeal.

and lets talk about the stacks of evidence provided by prosecution and find fault with one or two, lol, very strong logic indeed.

Not just "one or two" but many.

 

[Shane]

If the Sharifs didn't own Avenfield the case falls apart.

Yes, that avenue could have been strongly pursued with less chance of a successful appeal.

Not just "one or two" but many.

Yes, lets take your word for it indeed.

 

[Solomon2]

Nope the evidence against owner ship has been considered complete Sharif admitted it him self without any pressure.

In his closing argument the prosecutor stated Hussain Nawaz admitted ownership, not N.S. When did N.S. admit ownership?

I don't think it's enough that H.N. admits ownership; it has to be N.S. or his wife as at least part-owners.

 

[Shane]

If the Sharifs didn't own Avenfield the case falls apart.

That's the problem with you, you know scant about the case and yet you are here arguing about its demerits as if you know it all. Poor thing.

This thread is filled with documentary evidence obtained through MLA that proves asset ownership beyond any doubts dear and you are stuck at "If Avenfield apartments..." LOL.

 

[Solomon2]

This thread is filled with documentary evidence obtained through MLA that proves asset ownership beyond any doubts dear and you are stuck at "If Avenfield apartments..." LOL.

The court did not rule on the basis of "this thread".

Yes, lets take your word for it indeed.

You shouldn't do that. Better to read the judgment.

 

[Shane]

The court did not rule on the basis of "this thread".


You shouldn't do that. Better to read the judgment.

LOL to that, MLA is for evidence for courts and this thread only got it after it was submitted as evidence in court dear, lol.

@PakSword can you guess? Who here has suddenly become Nawaz case supporter and assuming Nawaz will win his appeal as evidence is not credible all of a sudden when the claim for posting that lame lawyer's article was that "I was only looking for a rebuttal". How convenient. From NAB law is inappropriate to Evidence is not up to legal standards, the twists and turns are remarkable indeed.

 

[newb3e]

so apts are still property of nawaz or govt of Pakistan?

 

[BHarwana]

@PakSword are you listening to Nawaz press conference?

 

[PakSword]

LOL to that, MLA is for evidence for courts and this thread only got it after it was submitted as evidence in court dear, lol.

@PakSword can you guess? Who here has suddenly become Nawaz case supporter and assuming Nawaz will win his appeal as evidence is not credible all of a sudden when the claim for posting that lame lawyer's article was that "I was only looking for a rebuttal". How convenient. From NAB law is inappropriate to Evidence is not up to legal standards, the twists and turns are remarkable indeed.

You are giving attention to a guy who thinks that fake holocaust was real?

@PakSword are you listening to Nawaz press conference?

Yes.. Maryam's bhoota has also been fitted in the same frame.. Harami khandaan is coming for bloodshed.. I am telling you..