Path-Finder
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 24,393
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Panama Case - Post Verdict Discussion and Updates
- Thread starter Arsalan
- Start date
Shane
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,459
- Reaction score
- 56
- Country
- Location
Liberal Leather Pantied Retard= Libtard
How is it related to Panama case or this thread is beyond our ignoramus friend out on his wild goose chase to satisfy his usual obsession with anything PTI.
Verve
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,116
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
He is a sick poor puppy.
Valar.
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2017
- Messages
- 4,144
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Tabdeeli aagayi. lol
https://www.geo.tv/latest/196592-three-pml-n-members-defect-to-pti
Array tum potians ka menay bigara kya hai aakhir? lol
https://www.geo.tv/latest/196592-three-pml-n-members-defect-to-pti
Array tum potians ka menay bigara kya hai aakhir? lol
Shane
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,459
- Reaction score
- 56
- Country
- Location
Aik Libtard kisi ka kiya bigar sakta hay siwa'ay apni poti karti zaban chalanay kay, admittedly, we have no cure for your verbal diarrhea son, lol.
You were cursing all sorts of obscenities for this thread not too long ago. Why then you keep posting colorful after effects of your mistakes of adolescence here?
Tps43
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 4,960
- Reaction score
- 16
- Country
- Location
Khalai makhlooq working against my leader nawaz shairf superman
Operation Midnigh Jackal
Operational scope operational tactical
Location ISI Secretariat, Islamabad
Planned 1989
Planned by Directorate for the Internal Political Intelligence
Target Benazir Bhutto's government
Prime minister Secretariat
Date 1989
Indesivice
Outcome Operation/Mission failed
Successful infiltration and sting counter-operation by Joint Intelligence Bureau (JIB)
Courts-martial launched by Judge Advocate General Corps
Casualties None
Operation Midnight Jackal was a covert-intelligence operation that was widely reported as one of the high profile political scandals during the first government of Prime minister Benazir Bhutto in 1989. The Midnight Jackal was exposed by ISI in a sting operation of theirs, when it had obtained a tapefrom Intelligence Bureau (IB) containing a conversation of two active-duty army officers and a rogue ISI operative regarding toppling the government. This ring was headed by a ISI rogue agent Brigadier-General Imtiaz "the Cat" Ahmed, who was widely regarded as the mastermind of this plot.[1]
The tape exposed the conversation of another rogue agent Major Amir Khan, who revealed that General Mirza Aslam Beg, the then-Chief of Army Staff, with the backing of the conservative President Ghulam Ishaq Khan, had ambitions to topple the Benazir Bhutto's government, and to bring a more conservative Nawaz Sharif and other conservatives in power instead.
Due to the lack of sufficient evidence against the Chief of Army Staff, his court martial could not take place. The Judge Advocate General Corps launched the full-fledged military inquiry against the Brigadier-General Ahmed and Major Amir Khan, subsequently ending their military careers. The military investigators and military lawyers of prosecution revealed that Major Amir Khan was the architect of the Midnight Jackal, under the auspicious of Brigadier-General Ahmed. The investigations revealed that some members of the establishment wanted to pay hefty bribes to the senior leadership of Benazir Bhutto's Peoples Party to bring the vote of no confidence movement in the Parliament, according to the VII Amendment. The military lawyers also reported that the objectives of the Midnight Jackal were to support Nawaz Sharif as the establishment was said to have "liked" or preferred Sharif as a country's prime minister, and was a part of his political camp. Major Amir Khan told his military lawyers that: "Nawaz Sharif was more acceptable to the [Pakistan] Army than Benazir Bhutto, and the establishment was against of every leader who had people’s mandate behind them. They prefer weak leaders like Sharif, which the Army could control", Major Amir Khan maintained.
Operation Midnigh Jackal
Operational scope operational tactical
Location ISI Secretariat, Islamabad
Planned 1989
Planned by Directorate for the Internal Political Intelligence
Target Benazir Bhutto's government
Prime minister Secretariat
Date 1989
Indesivice
Outcome Operation/Mission failed
Successful infiltration and sting counter-operation by Joint Intelligence Bureau (JIB)
Courts-martial launched by Judge Advocate General Corps
Casualties None
Operation Midnight Jackal was a covert-intelligence operation that was widely reported as one of the high profile political scandals during the first government of Prime minister Benazir Bhutto in 1989. The Midnight Jackal was exposed by ISI in a sting operation of theirs, when it had obtained a tapefrom Intelligence Bureau (IB) containing a conversation of two active-duty army officers and a rogue ISI operative regarding toppling the government. This ring was headed by a ISI rogue agent Brigadier-General Imtiaz "the Cat" Ahmed, who was widely regarded as the mastermind of this plot.[1]
The tape exposed the conversation of another rogue agent Major Amir Khan, who revealed that General Mirza Aslam Beg, the then-Chief of Army Staff, with the backing of the conservative President Ghulam Ishaq Khan, had ambitions to topple the Benazir Bhutto's government, and to bring a more conservative Nawaz Sharif and other conservatives in power instead.
Due to the lack of sufficient evidence against the Chief of Army Staff, his court martial could not take place. The Judge Advocate General Corps launched the full-fledged military inquiry against the Brigadier-General Ahmed and Major Amir Khan, subsequently ending their military careers. The military investigators and military lawyers of prosecution revealed that Major Amir Khan was the architect of the Midnight Jackal, under the auspicious of Brigadier-General Ahmed. The investigations revealed that some members of the establishment wanted to pay hefty bribes to the senior leadership of Benazir Bhutto's Peoples Party to bring the vote of no confidence movement in the Parliament, according to the VII Amendment. The military lawyers also reported that the objectives of the Midnight Jackal were to support Nawaz Sharif as the establishment was said to have "liked" or preferred Sharif as a country's prime minister, and was a part of his political camp. Major Amir Khan told his military lawyers that: "Nawaz Sharif was more acceptable to the [Pakistan] Army than Benazir Bhutto, and the establishment was against of every leader who had people’s mandate behind them. They prefer weak leaders like Sharif, which the Army could control", Major Amir Khan maintained.
newb3e
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 12,545
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
pti psp are fauji dry cleaning service...jao aur gunnah saaf karwa lo! bawakoof banna rahay hain!
Bratva
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2010
- Messages
- 13,832
- Reaction score
- 67
- Country
- Location
Zardari acquitted in final corruption case
Malik AsadAugust 27, 2017
Facebook Count99
Twitter Share
0
FORMER president Asif Ali Zardari has been acquitted in five corruption cases — the SGS, Cotecna, Ursus Tractors, Polo Ground and ARY Gold references — since 2014.
ISLAMABAD: Former president and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) co-chairperson Asif Ali Zardari on Saturday got a clean chit in the sixth and final corruption reference against him, thanks to an apparently “friendly” and “weak” prosecution.
A Rawalpindi accountability court, on Aug 17, had reserved its judgement on a plea filed by the former president and announced the verdict nine days later. Mr Zardari had sought acquittal in a reference regarding his alleged illegal assets, in Pakistan and abroad.
Accountability courts have already acquitted Mr Zardari in five corruption cases since 2014: the SGS, Cotecna, Ursus Tractors, Polo Ground and ARY Gold references.
NAB took ‘lackadaisical’ approach to illegal assets reference; prosecutor failed to rebut Farooq Naek’s arguments
In the second week of August, the court started day-to-day proceedings in the final reference.
The application filed by Mr Zardari under section 265-K of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) claimed that the prosecution had produced weak and inadmissible evidence during the trial.
An accused usually moves an acquittal plea under section 265-K of the CrPC when he can convince the court that he may not be convicted on the basis of the prosecution evidence and continuing the trial would be a futile exercise.
However, in this case, this application was moved at a time when the trial was in its final stages, with the prosecution having so far produced 40 of 41 witnesses, and would have been completed in a couple of months.
Though Mr Zardari moved the application in January this year, proceedings were being conducted at a snail’s pace since his counsel Farooq H. Naek was unavailable, first due to other commitments and later due to an ailment.
But following the verdict in the Panama Papers case on July 28, progress in the matter accelerated and the court began conducting day-to-day proceedings with the consent of Mr Naek and the prosecution.
‘Unenthusiastic’ NAB
A source in the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) told Dawn that since their current chairman Qamar Zaman Chaudhry was due to retire on Oct 10, “stakeholders” wanted the case to be concluded before his retirement.
NAB has not appeared too enthusiastic in its pursuit of this high-profile corruption reference.
A lesser-known prosecutor, Sardar Tahir Ayub, who was appointed to NAB by the PPP government, was assigned to the case.
Surprisingly, Mr Zardari’s defence team — led by Farooq H. Naek — also included Sardar Zulqernain, a serving legal adviser with the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Accountability Bureau, along with other lawyers.
Mr Zulqernain has worked with Rawalpindi NAB as an additional deputy prosecutor general and is known as a close friend of the prosecutor, Tahir Ayub.
According to a senior NAB official, the prosecutor should have objected to the presence of Mr Zulqernain, since an official of the AJK Accountability Bureau could not appear as counsel for an accused.
When contacted, Mr Ayub admitted that he knew Mr Zulqernain was a serving AJK Accountability Bureau official, but said he did not think it appropriate to object to his presence.
Defence case
During the course of his arguments, Mr Naek had questioned the admissibility of the evidence produced by the prosecution.
Mr Naek contended that the witnesses produced thus far were irrelevant, and that the evidence laid before the court did not meet the standards of the Qanoon-i-Shahadat (Law of Evidence).
According to him, Section 103 of the CrPC made it mandatory for the investigation officer to prepare a seizure memo for each and every recovery, along with the statement of at least two witnesses to that recovery.
But the prosecution, he contended, did not produce any such document on the record, which meant that the entire evidence was doubtful in the eyes of law and the benefit of doubt should go to the accused. He also pointed out that evidence based on photocopies was not admissible.
While Mr Naek took four days to complete his arguments on the admissibility of the evidence and authenticity of documents, the prosecutor only availed an hour to rebut his arguments on August 17.
Mr Ayub read out the statement of an approver related to the four sugar mills owned by Mr Zardari and told the court that the approver Ausaf Ali Agha had confessed to having set up these four sugar mills for Mr Zardari in the names of alleged frontmen.
But he did not rebut the arguments that raised serious doubts on the authenticity of the evidence.
The assets reference and five other cases against Mr Zardari were closed in 2007 under the controversial National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO), a deal signed between retired Gen Pervez Musharraf and PPP chairperson Benazir Bhutto, which granted amnesty to politicians, political workers and bureaucrats in corruption cases.
However, in 2009 the Supreme Court declared NRO void ab initio and ordered the revival of the cases. By then, Mr Zardari had been sworn in as president, acquiring immunity under Article 248 of the Constitution. The assets reference was reopened by NAB in April 2015.
Published in Dawn, August 27th, 2017
So Mian Newb3w, The million dollar question is whose man Qamar Zaman Chaudhary was ? Prove me wrong, that Qamar Zaman let zardari go because Nawaz Sharif was going easy on him !
A source in the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) told Dawn that since their current chairman Qamar Zaman Chaudhry was due to retire on Oct 10, “stakeholders” wanted the case to be concluded before his retirement.
newb3e
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 12,545
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
zardari is not your avg joe nawaj he is a evil true evil and he knows how to play this game! i am sure he got a huge ego but he also knows when to bow down and save his arse! i am sure is na nab ko khooob khilaya hoga not only nab judges fauji sab is keh puppets hain! nawaj is kid infront of this bastard! hiZardari acquitted in final corruption case
Malik AsadAugust 27, 2017
Facebook Count99
Twitter Share
0
FORMER president Asif Ali Zardari has been acquitted in five corruption cases — the SGS, Cotecna, Ursus Tractors, Polo Ground and ARY Gold references — since 2014.
ISLAMABAD: Former president and Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) co-chairperson Asif Ali Zardari on Saturday got a clean chit in the sixth and final corruption reference against him, thanks to an apparently “friendly” and “weak” prosecution.
A Rawalpindi accountability court, on Aug 17, had reserved its judgement on a plea filed by the former president and announced the verdict nine days later. Mr Zardari had sought acquittal in a reference regarding his alleged illegal assets, in Pakistan and abroad.
Accountability courts have already acquitted Mr Zardari in five corruption cases since 2014: the SGS, Cotecna, Ursus Tractors, Polo Ground and ARY Gold references.
NAB took ‘lackadaisical’ approach to illegal assets reference; prosecutor failed to rebut Farooq Naek’s arguments
In the second week of August, the court started day-to-day proceedings in the final reference.
The application filed by Mr Zardari under section 265-K of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) claimed that the prosecution had produced weak and inadmissible evidence during the trial.
An accused usually moves an acquittal plea under section 265-K of the CrPC when he can convince the court that he may not be convicted on the basis of the prosecution evidence and continuing the trial would be a futile exercise.
However, in this case, this application was moved at a time when the trial was in its final stages, with the prosecution having so far produced 40 of 41 witnesses, and would have been completed in a couple of months.
Though Mr Zardari moved the application in January this year, proceedings were being conducted at a snail’s pace since his counsel Farooq H. Naek was unavailable, first due to other commitments and later due to an ailment.
But following the verdict in the Panama Papers case on July 28, progress in the matter accelerated and the court began conducting day-to-day proceedings with the consent of Mr Naek and the prosecution.
‘Unenthusiastic’ NAB
A source in the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) told Dawn that since their current chairman Qamar Zaman Chaudhry was due to retire on Oct 10, “stakeholders” wanted the case to be concluded before his retirement.
NAB has not appeared too enthusiastic in its pursuit of this high-profile corruption reference.
A lesser-known prosecutor, Sardar Tahir Ayub, who was appointed to NAB by the PPP government, was assigned to the case.
Surprisingly, Mr Zardari’s defence team — led by Farooq H. Naek — also included Sardar Zulqernain, a serving legal adviser with the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Accountability Bureau, along with other lawyers.
Mr Zulqernain has worked with Rawalpindi NAB as an additional deputy prosecutor general and is known as a close friend of the prosecutor, Tahir Ayub.
According to a senior NAB official, the prosecutor should have objected to the presence of Mr Zulqernain, since an official of the AJK Accountability Bureau could not appear as counsel for an accused.
When contacted, Mr Ayub admitted that he knew Mr Zulqernain was a serving AJK Accountability Bureau official, but said he did not think it appropriate to object to his presence.
Defence case
During the course of his arguments, Mr Naek had questioned the admissibility of the evidence produced by the prosecution.
Mr Naek contended that the witnesses produced thus far were irrelevant, and that the evidence laid before the court did not meet the standards of the Qanoon-i-Shahadat (Law of Evidence).
According to him, Section 103 of the CrPC made it mandatory for the investigation officer to prepare a seizure memo for each and every recovery, along with the statement of at least two witnesses to that recovery.
But the prosecution, he contended, did not produce any such document on the record, which meant that the entire evidence was doubtful in the eyes of law and the benefit of doubt should go to the accused. He also pointed out that evidence based on photocopies was not admissible.
While Mr Naek took four days to complete his arguments on the admissibility of the evidence and authenticity of documents, the prosecutor only availed an hour to rebut his arguments on August 17.
Mr Ayub read out the statement of an approver related to the four sugar mills owned by Mr Zardari and told the court that the approver Ausaf Ali Agha had confessed to having set up these four sugar mills for Mr Zardari in the names of alleged frontmen.
But he did not rebut the arguments that raised serious doubts on the authenticity of the evidence.
The assets reference and five other cases against Mr Zardari were closed in 2007 under the controversial National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO), a deal signed between retired Gen Pervez Musharraf and PPP chairperson Benazir Bhutto, which granted amnesty to politicians, political workers and bureaucrats in corruption cases.
However, in 2009 the Supreme Court declared NRO void ab initio and ordered the revival of the cases. By then, Mr Zardari had been sworn in as president, acquiring immunity under Article 248 of the Constitution. The assets reference was reopened by NAB in April 2015.
Published in Dawn, August 27th, 2017
So Mian Newb3w, The million dollar question is whose man Qamar Zaman Chaudhary was ? Prove me wrong, that Qamar Zaman let zardari go because Nawaz Sharif was going easy on him !
A source in the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) told Dawn that since their current chairman Qamar Zaman Chaudhry was due to retire on Oct 10, “stakeholders” wanted the case to be concluded before his retirement.
Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,006
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Actually reverse is true Zardari is kid infront of treasonous Nawaz 300 billion is no t a small amount
newb3e
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2007
- Messages
- 12,545
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
zardari na is say kaheen zyada banaya hoga!! app sirf bahria town jesay protech ki economics dekho toh your mind will be blown!!
then there are many high rises in heart of khi land alone jin ka billion ka hai! specifically one near avari towers...then he had grabbed land in interior sindh aur pata nai kahan kahan!! and 300 billion ka kia karna hai jab cases open hun lets say zardari has half of that 150 billion and remaining half ie 150 he used to bribe fauji and judges and now he is acquited of all the corruption cases who is smarter nawaj or asif!!
ya barra kmaina hai sab ko khilaye ga aur ash karay ga!
tung balanga dal dayna shane bhai bhi nawaj camp may ajaye gay...
Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,006
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Hoga? Really? So your argument is baded on hoga?
He was let off the hook by baboons for being a good boy
Tameem
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2008
- Messages
- 4,468
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
Last edited:
QatariPrince
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2017
- Messages
- 2,494
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
میری عمر 44سال ہے ،مریم نواز کا احتساب عدالت میں بیان
جے آئی ٹی سپریم کورٹ کی معاونت کے لئے تشکیل دی گئی ، مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی کا اخذ کردہ نتیجہ اور رائے غیر مناسب اور غیر متعلقہ ہے; مریم نواز کا بیان
اس رائے کو ان حالات میں اس کیس میں میرے خلاف پیش نہیں کیا جا سکتا ، مریم نواز
مریم نواز لکھے بیان میں کومہ اور فل سٹاپ بھی پڑھنے لگیں
مریم نواز لکھے بیان میں کومہ اور فل سٹاپ بھی پڑھنے لگیں. کامہ تو نہ پڑھیں ، جج محمد بشیر کا اعتراض
میرے وکیل نے پڑھنے کو کہا میں نے پڑھ دیا ، مریم نواز کا جواب
بیس اپریل 2017 کے سپریم کورٹ کے فیصلے میں میرا اور میرے خاوند کا ذکر نہیں تھا ؛مریم نواز کا جواب
پانچ مئی 2017 کو سپریم کورٹ کے حکم پر جے آئی ٹی تشکیل دی گئی ؛ مریم نواز کا جواب
جے آئی ٹی کا اس ٹرائل سے کوئی تعلق نہیں ، مریم نواز
بلال رسول کی اہلیہ بھی پی ٹی آئی کا سرگرم سپورٹر ہیں، وہ کھلے عام ن لیگ کے مخالف ہیں؛ مریم نواز
آئین کا آرٹیکل 10A فئیر ٹرائل کا حق دیتا ہے ؛ مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی کے ارکان کو سپریم کورٹ نے تعینات کیا ,جے آئی ٹی کے ارکان پر تحفظات تھے ؛ مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی ارکان جانبدار تھے. بلال رسول کا تعلق ایس ای سی پی سے تھا؛ مریم نواز
بلال رسول میاں اظہر کے حقیقی بھانجے تھے ؛ مریم نواز
بلال رسول اور ان کا خاندان پی ٹی آئی کا سپورٹر ہے ؛ مریم نواز
اس بات کا ثبوت میاں اظہر کے بیٹے حماد اظہر کی عمران خان سے ملاقات ہے؛ مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی ارکان پر تحفظات سے متعلق میرا بھی وہی موقف ہے جو نواز شریف کا تھا، مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی اور جے آئی ٹی رپورٹ اس کیس میں غیر متعلقہ ہیں، مریم نواز
یہ بات درست ہے کہ میرے والد عوامی عہدوں پر رہے،مریم نواز
عرفان منگی کی تعیناتی کا کیس سپریم کورٹ میں ابھی تک زیر التوا ہے،مریم نواز
ستر سالہ سول ملٹری جھگڑے کا بھی جے آئی ٹی پر اثر پڑا،مریم نواز
آئی ایس آئی اورایم آئی افسران کی جے آئی ٹی میں تعیناتی مناسب نہیں تھی ،مریم نواز
عامر عزیز کو 2000میں مشرف حکومت نے ڈیپوٹیشن پر نیب میں تعینات کیا،مریم نواز
سال 2000میں عامر عزیز بطور ڈائریکٹر بینکنگ کام کر رہے تھے ،مریم نواز
نعمان سعید کو آؤٹ سورس کیا گیا کیونکہ انکی تنخواہ بھی سرکاری رکارڈسے ظاہر نہیں ہوتی، مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی میں تعیناتی کےوقت نعمان سعید آئی ایس آئی میں نہیں تھے،مریم نواز
ڈان لیکس کی وجہ سے سول ملٹری تناؤمیں اضافہ ہوا،مریم نواز
میری اطلاعات کےمطابق بریگیڈیئر نعمان سعید ڈان لیکس کی انکوائری کمیٹی کاحصہ تھے،مریم نواز
عرفان منگی کو بھی جے آئی ٹی میں شامل کر دیا گیا،مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے جے آئی ٹی کے جمع کردہ شواہد کی روشنی میں ریفرنس دائر کرنےکاکہا ،مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی تفتیشی رپورٹ ہے جو ناقابل قبول شہادت ہے،مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی کی والیم 10 پر مشتمل خود ساختہ رپورٹ غیر متعلقہ تھی،مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے جے آئی ٹی کو اختیارات دیے کہ قانونی درخواستوں کونمٹایا جا سکے،مریم نواز
ایسے اختیارات دینا غیر مناسب اور غیر متعلقہ تھا،مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی کی خود ساختہ حتمی رپورٹ سپریم کورٹ میں دائر درخواستیں نمٹانے کیلیےتھی، مریم نواز
ان درخواستوں کو بطورشواہد پیش نہیں کیا جا سکتا،مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے یہ نہیں کہا کہ جے آئی ٹی رپورٹ کوبطور شواہد ریفرنس کاحصہ بنایاجائے، مریم نواز
مشرف خود ساختہ جلاوطنی پر بیرون ملک ہے، مریم نواز
سال 2000میں عامر عزیز بطور ڈائریکٹر بینکنگ کام کر رہے تھے ، مریم نواز
عامر عزیز کو 2000میں مشرف حکومت نے ڈیپوٹیشن پر نیب میں تعینات کیا، مریم نواز
آئی ایس آئی کے بریگیڈیئر نعمان اور کامران کا تعلق ایم آئی سے تھا ،مریم نواز
ستر سالہ سول ملٹری جھگڑے کا بھی جے آئی ٹی پر اثر پڑا ، مریم نواز
عرفان منگی کی تعیناتی کا کیس سپریم کورٹ میں ابھی تک زیر التوا ہے ، مریم نواز
میری اطلاعات کے مطابق بریگیڈیئر نعمان سعید ڈان لیکس کی انکوائری کمیٹی کا حصہ تھے ، مریم نواز
ڈان لیکس کی وجہ سے سول ملٹری تناو میں اضافہ ہوا ،مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی میں تعیناتی کے وقت نعمان سعید آئی ایس آئی میں نہیں تھے ، مریم نواز
نعمان سعید کو آوٹ سورس کیا گیا کیونکہ ان کی تنخواہ بھی سرکاری ریکارڈ سے ظاہر نہیں ہوتی ، مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے جے آئی ٹی کو اختیارات دیئے کہ قانونی درخواستوں کو نمٹایا جا سکے،مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی کی خود ساختہ حتمی رپورٹ سپریم کورٹ میں دائر درخواستیں نمٹانے کے لئے تھی ، مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے جے آئی ٹی کی طرف سے اکٹھے کئے گئے شواہد کی روشنی میں ریفرنس دائر کرنے کا کہا ، ۔مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے یہ نہیں کہا کہ جے آئی ٹی رپورٹ کو بطور شواہد ریفرنس کا حصہ بنایا جائے ، مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی سپریم کورٹ کی معاونت کے لئے تشکیل دی گئی ، مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی کا اخذ کردہ نتیجہ اور رائے غیر مناسب اور غیر متعلقہ ہے; مریم نواز کا بیان
اس رائے کو ان حالات میں اس کیس میں میرے خلاف پیش نہیں کیا جا سکتا ، مریم نواز
مریم نواز لکھے بیان میں کومہ اور فل سٹاپ بھی پڑھنے لگیں
مریم نواز لکھے بیان میں کومہ اور فل سٹاپ بھی پڑھنے لگیں. کامہ تو نہ پڑھیں ، جج محمد بشیر کا اعتراض
میرے وکیل نے پڑھنے کو کہا میں نے پڑھ دیا ، مریم نواز کا جواب
بیس اپریل 2017 کے سپریم کورٹ کے فیصلے میں میرا اور میرے خاوند کا ذکر نہیں تھا ؛مریم نواز کا جواب
پانچ مئی 2017 کو سپریم کورٹ کے حکم پر جے آئی ٹی تشکیل دی گئی ؛ مریم نواز کا جواب
جے آئی ٹی کا اس ٹرائل سے کوئی تعلق نہیں ، مریم نواز
بلال رسول کی اہلیہ بھی پی ٹی آئی کا سرگرم سپورٹر ہیں، وہ کھلے عام ن لیگ کے مخالف ہیں؛ مریم نواز
آئین کا آرٹیکل 10A فئیر ٹرائل کا حق دیتا ہے ؛ مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی کے ارکان کو سپریم کورٹ نے تعینات کیا ,جے آئی ٹی کے ارکان پر تحفظات تھے ؛ مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی ارکان جانبدار تھے. بلال رسول کا تعلق ایس ای سی پی سے تھا؛ مریم نواز
بلال رسول میاں اظہر کے حقیقی بھانجے تھے ؛ مریم نواز
بلال رسول اور ان کا خاندان پی ٹی آئی کا سپورٹر ہے ؛ مریم نواز
اس بات کا ثبوت میاں اظہر کے بیٹے حماد اظہر کی عمران خان سے ملاقات ہے؛ مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی ارکان پر تحفظات سے متعلق میرا بھی وہی موقف ہے جو نواز شریف کا تھا، مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی اور جے آئی ٹی رپورٹ اس کیس میں غیر متعلقہ ہیں، مریم نواز
یہ بات درست ہے کہ میرے والد عوامی عہدوں پر رہے،مریم نواز
عرفان منگی کی تعیناتی کا کیس سپریم کورٹ میں ابھی تک زیر التوا ہے،مریم نواز
ستر سالہ سول ملٹری جھگڑے کا بھی جے آئی ٹی پر اثر پڑا،مریم نواز
آئی ایس آئی اورایم آئی افسران کی جے آئی ٹی میں تعیناتی مناسب نہیں تھی ،مریم نواز
عامر عزیز کو 2000میں مشرف حکومت نے ڈیپوٹیشن پر نیب میں تعینات کیا،مریم نواز
سال 2000میں عامر عزیز بطور ڈائریکٹر بینکنگ کام کر رہے تھے ،مریم نواز
نعمان سعید کو آؤٹ سورس کیا گیا کیونکہ انکی تنخواہ بھی سرکاری رکارڈسے ظاہر نہیں ہوتی، مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی میں تعیناتی کےوقت نعمان سعید آئی ایس آئی میں نہیں تھے،مریم نواز
ڈان لیکس کی وجہ سے سول ملٹری تناؤمیں اضافہ ہوا،مریم نواز
میری اطلاعات کےمطابق بریگیڈیئر نعمان سعید ڈان لیکس کی انکوائری کمیٹی کاحصہ تھے،مریم نواز
عرفان منگی کو بھی جے آئی ٹی میں شامل کر دیا گیا،مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے جے آئی ٹی کے جمع کردہ شواہد کی روشنی میں ریفرنس دائر کرنےکاکہا ،مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی تفتیشی رپورٹ ہے جو ناقابل قبول شہادت ہے،مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی کی والیم 10 پر مشتمل خود ساختہ رپورٹ غیر متعلقہ تھی،مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے جے آئی ٹی کو اختیارات دیے کہ قانونی درخواستوں کونمٹایا جا سکے،مریم نواز
ایسے اختیارات دینا غیر مناسب اور غیر متعلقہ تھا،مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی کی خود ساختہ حتمی رپورٹ سپریم کورٹ میں دائر درخواستیں نمٹانے کیلیےتھی، مریم نواز
ان درخواستوں کو بطورشواہد پیش نہیں کیا جا سکتا،مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے یہ نہیں کہا کہ جے آئی ٹی رپورٹ کوبطور شواہد ریفرنس کاحصہ بنایاجائے، مریم نواز
مشرف خود ساختہ جلاوطنی پر بیرون ملک ہے، مریم نواز
سال 2000میں عامر عزیز بطور ڈائریکٹر بینکنگ کام کر رہے تھے ، مریم نواز
عامر عزیز کو 2000میں مشرف حکومت نے ڈیپوٹیشن پر نیب میں تعینات کیا، مریم نواز
آئی ایس آئی کے بریگیڈیئر نعمان اور کامران کا تعلق ایم آئی سے تھا ،مریم نواز
ستر سالہ سول ملٹری جھگڑے کا بھی جے آئی ٹی پر اثر پڑا ، مریم نواز
عرفان منگی کی تعیناتی کا کیس سپریم کورٹ میں ابھی تک زیر التوا ہے ، مریم نواز
میری اطلاعات کے مطابق بریگیڈیئر نعمان سعید ڈان لیکس کی انکوائری کمیٹی کا حصہ تھے ، مریم نواز
ڈان لیکس کی وجہ سے سول ملٹری تناو میں اضافہ ہوا ،مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی میں تعیناتی کے وقت نعمان سعید آئی ایس آئی میں نہیں تھے ، مریم نواز
نعمان سعید کو آوٹ سورس کیا گیا کیونکہ ان کی تنخواہ بھی سرکاری ریکارڈ سے ظاہر نہیں ہوتی ، مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے جے آئی ٹی کو اختیارات دیئے کہ قانونی درخواستوں کو نمٹایا جا سکے،مریم نواز
جے آئی ٹی کی خود ساختہ حتمی رپورٹ سپریم کورٹ میں دائر درخواستیں نمٹانے کے لئے تھی ، مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے جے آئی ٹی کی طرف سے اکٹھے کئے گئے شواہد کی روشنی میں ریفرنس دائر کرنے کا کہا ، ۔مریم نواز
سپریم کورٹ نے یہ نہیں کہا کہ جے آئی ٹی رپورٹ کو بطور شواہد ریفرنس کا حصہ بنایا جائے ، مریم نواز
____________________________________
LOL
مریم نواز لکھے بیان میں کومہ اور فل سٹاپ بھی پڑھنے لگیں
مریم نواز لکھے بیان میں کومہ اور فل سٹاپ بھی پڑھنے لگیں. کامہ تو نہ پڑھیں ، جج محمد بشیر کا اعتراض
میرے وکیل نے پڑھنے کو کہا میں نے پڑھ دیا ، مریم نواز کا جواب
میرے وکیل نے پڑھنے کو کہا میں نے پڑھ دیا ، مریم نواز کا جواب
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Imran Khan vs Pakistan: Protest of Treachery - Casualty Report
- Latest: Novus ordu seclorum
-
No Strings Attached: Discover Local Ladies in Your Town- Latest: rana.aamir2990
-
-
Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts
-
Imran Khan vs Pakistan: Protest of Treachery - Casualty Report
- Latest: Novus ordu seclorum
-
-
-
-
Bajwa calls Bushra's allegations against Saudi Arabia 'baseless'
- Latest: Novus ordu seclorum
