CJ will decide in favour of govt. That's the way they work - unless there is heavier than concrete evidence - they will decide in Govt. favour.
Then turn around and claim that see, we are not against the govt. or any person or else why would we rule in their favour.
Against the whole stack of rulings in favour of PMLN Govt. , this CJ has no ruling in favour of the people of Pakistan but the ruling politicians.
In Hudaibya case, first he made a bench that had Justice Khosa which was obviously not to last...then he made a bench led by QFI of all judges. His comments, orders and gag on mention of Justice Khosa ruling on hudaibya and the eventual result of rejection of appeal just goes to clarify the "deliberate mistake" and its eventual correction in the form of QFI.
I dont think so... have u read IK's verdict? In tht verdict..CJ has explained panama verdict much better than Ejaz Afzal did on 28th July's verdict.. CJ has done full be izzati of NS in Imran Khan's verdict...like bohat ziada beizzati..which none expected..and explained how IK is not similar to panama case,. U must read it...
If he was sympathetic to Nawaz Sharif..even if he would have not disqualified IK..he wouldnt hv done soo much beizzati of NS as he did in IK verdict.. i loved CJ's verdict...
Plus..this bench for hearing petitions against election bill is a pretty decent one.. i like it
CJ ..i think is honest ,....after reading IK verdict
Ijazul Ahsan...we all know
J Maqbool Baqar is the one..who dissented in orange train verdict..tht is against orange train project..against Punjab govt..even though panama judges allowed tht..oroject with certain restrictions..
So i think...its a pretty decent bench,l i like this one
In Hudaibya case, first he made a bench that had Justice Khosa which was obviously not to last...then he made a bench led by QFI of all judges. His comments, orders and gag on mention of Justice Khosa ruling on hudaibya and the eventual result of rejection of appeal just goes to clarify the "deliberate mistake" and its eventual correction in the form of QFI.
Hudaibya bench was not led by Qazi Faez Isa but by J Mushir Alam..but yes Qazi Faez Isa was the most vocal and ghatya one,.
Remember that some requests for assistance with foreign countries were pending at the time of JIT completion and Volume X was kept undisclosed at that time. I think JIT members, specially Wajid Zia, must have followed up on those requests in his personal capacity. No law against collecting evidence related to any investigation of wrong doings.
.
But follow up on those pending MLU had to be done by NAB aur suna tha ke NAB ko kuch reply aaye bhi hain...tu jo bhi new evidence hoga..NAB ke pass hoga..
JIT ka kaam tu khatam hogaya tha pehle.. Wajid Zia ne mazeed koi investigations ya follow up nahi karna tha...aur na hi karna chahye tha....warna ek aur sazish sazish ka shor mach jana hai aur inki zindagi alag museebat honi hai