What's new

Palestinian drives car into Israeli soldiers

It's comical that a Jew is calling people with several thousand year old cultures, native moreover, for artificial. Jews of today and artificial are almost synonymous words.

Bunch of nonsense.

Every single of those "Jews" from Yemen to Morocco (from the Arab world basically) are just Arabs that converted to Judaism at one point and now call themselves Jews. A Yemeni Jew does not look any different from a Yemeni Muslim likewise a Jewish Iraqi does not look any different from a Muslim Iraqi.

It's called the Arabian Peninsula.:lol:

Strange that you YET again omitted my questions.

@Hazzy997

These people are unreal. :lol:

Now you know what I have to deal with on a daily basis. :D

They know how to piss someone off. And if you refute their statements they will either twist them around or throw another set of assertions at you. As if the Jewish word is all credible and non-Jews have zero credibility. And stupid people on this forum see it that way. That's why this donkey can say anything and get 5 thanks on his posts.
 
.
These people are unreal. :lol:

Now you know what I have to deal with on a daily basis. :D

They know how to piss someone off. And if you refute their statements they will either twist them around or throw another set of assertions at you. As if the Jewish world is all credible and non-Jews have zero credibility. And stupid people on this forum see it that way. That's why this donkey can say anything and get 5 thanks on his posts.

Well it does not take a genius to pick the historical nonsense apart. What is strange is that he is omitting my normal and straightforward questions. Wonder if the third time will be the lucky time.:lol:

Anyway he also told a big lie about the Israeli Jews of Arab backgrounds not admitting that. LOL. An Yemeni Jews life revolves around his Yemeni background. His appearance, music, cuisine, culture etc. Same with the Iraqi one. Egyptian. Syrian etc.

They should stick to claiming Arab cuisine as Israeli/Jewish cuisine as we have also seen on PDF and elsewhere.:lol:

Rootless people by large.



There is no difference among for instance Yemeni Jews and Yemeni Arabs. Just the religion which are both Semitic (Abrahamic religions) moreover to make the matter even more funnier.
 
Last edited:
.
@al-Hasani

I was debating a Mizrahi Jew on Facebook the other day. He actually refused to identify himself as an Arab. He said he was a Jew, they don't see it as distinction in religion but literal race/tribe/creed.
 
.
@al-Hasani

I was debating a Mizrahi Jew on Facebook the other day. He actually refused to identify himself as an Arab. He said he was a Jew, they don't see it as distinction in religion but literal race/tribe/creed.

They can refuse anything they want to. At the end of the day their looks, origins, culture, cuisine etc. is identical to their non-Jewish brethren. As you can see from the videos I posted (made by a Jew himself) this is not the case either necessarily.

Only clowns believe that there is no such thing called Palestinians. I would understand if some Papuans and other isolated people obsessed about "racial purity" would claim such a thing (actually not) but a JEW of all people? That's the biggest joke in a long time.

I can convert to Judaism tomorrow as well and call myself a Jew.

The ancient Hebrews have went extinct a long time ago and have probably mixed with us Arabs although this is a controversial topic but it should not really be as we are just talking about two Semitic neighboring peoples.

Point in case here. He was writing nonsense and is still omitting my questions. Take a look back at this thread. Funny reading.:lol:

As we all know then Jewish communities native to the Arab world have a much bigger historical claim on all fronts of being related to the ancient Hebrews than some Ethiopians (for instance) or Eastern Europeans. They can deny it all they want but we know that this is the reality.
 
Last edited:
.
They can refuse anything they want to. At the end of the day their looks, origins, culture, cuisine etc. is identical to their non-Jewish brethren. As you can see from the videos I posted (made by a Jew himself) this is not the case either necessarily.

Only clowns believe that there is no such thing called Palestinians. I would understand if some Papuans and other isolated people obsessed about "racial purity" would claim such a thing (actually not) but a JEW of all people? That's the biggest joke in a long time.

I can convert to Judaism tomorrow as well and call myself a Jew.

The ancient Hebrews have went extinct a long time ago and have probably mixed with us Arabs although this is a controversial topic but it should not really be as we are just talking about two Semitic neighboring peoples.

Point in case here. He was writing nonsense and is still omitting my questions. Take a look back at this thread. Funny reading.:lol:

As we all know then Jewish communities native to the Arab world have a much bigger historical claim on all fronts of being related to the ancient Hebrews than some Ethiopians (for instance) or Eastern Europeans. They can deny it all they want but we know that this is the reality.

They don't take converts. They believe in maintaining so called 'special' 'Jewish' linage.
 
. .
It's comical that a Jew is calling people with several thousand year old cultures, native moreover, for artificial. Jews of today and artificial are almost synonymous words.
I call Sykes Picot lines artificial. As I said, Galilee Arabs are much closer culturally and linguistically to Lebanese rather than to Gaza Arabs.

Every single of those "Jews" from Yemen to Morocco (from the Arab world basically) are just Arabs that converted to Judaism at one point and now call themselves Jews.
Quite the opposite. Wast majority of Arabs today are Arabizied peoples.

Strange that you YET again omitted my questions.
What questions?
 
.
Your lack of knowledge about the Arab world is clear once again. What has borders to do with local, several thousand year old communities? Nothing is the answer. The Jews of what is now Iraq could have lived in a country called "Isrealistan" yet they would still be tied to their lands. Just as the Yemeni, Moroccan, Syrian, Egyptian, Libyan etc. Jews. They existed long before England was known as a country let alone events 100 years ago!

Haha, you are trying to create silly and tiny differences among the Palestinians yet are silent when it comes to the Jews which do not even really exist outside of the religion.

Yes, the Arabian Peninsula was also Arabized 1500 years ago. Before the appearance of Islam only parts of the Arabian Peninsula spoke Arabic (to this day you have several Southern Semitic languages spoken in modern-day Yemen and Oman) yet all of what is now the Arab world has an ancient Semitic or Hamito-Semitic past and the genetics are also very much similar as well as pretty much everything else.

Go look back in this thread and you will find your answer.
 
Last edited:
.
Your lack of knowledge about the Arab world is clear once again. What has borders to do with local, several thousand year old communities?
What u call Palestinian, Lebanese and Iraqis are defined by artificial Sykes Picot borders and nothing else. Had they drew borders differently Hazzy could be now a Egyptian or Jordanian or Lebanese.

Nothing is the answer. The Jews of what is now Iraq could have lived in a country called "Isrealistan" yet they would still be tied to their lands. Just as the Yemeni, Moroccan, Syrian, Egyptian, Libyan etc. Jews. They existed long before England was known as a country let alone events 100 years ago!
You said they are Arabs who converted to Judaism but that nonsense. Because Jews lived in Iraq and Morocco looooong before Arabs came there. Its the opposite: some 90% of today Arabs are Arabizied peoples: Arameans, Phoenicians, Egyptians, Berbers, Chaldeans, black Africans and so on...

Haha, you are trying to create silly and tiny differences among the Palestinians yet are silent when it comes to the Jews which do not even really exist outside of the religion.
How can you define a "Palestinian" without Sykes Picot Borders?
 
.
What u call Palestinian, Lebanese and Iraqis are defined by artificial Sykes Picot borders and nothing else. Had they drew borders differently Hazzy could be now a Egyptian or Jordanian or Lebanese.


You said they are Arabs who converted to Judaism but that nonsense. Because Jews lived in Iraq and Morocco looooong before Arabs came there. As I said its quite the opposite: some 90% of today Arabs are Arabizied peoples: Arameans, Phoenicians, Egyptians, Berbers, Chaldeans, black Africans and so on...


How can you define a "Palestinian" without Sykes Picot Borders?

Total nonsense claim. Those are ancient historical regions predating any 100 year old borders by millenniums. Thanks for confirming what I wrote earlier.

No, they did not. Jews are not a race. Hebrews are and they never lived in Morocco or all those other countries. They are also extinct. Have been for centuries upon centuries.

There is nothing called Jew today in terms of being an ethnicity. It's just a word for a person that follows Judaism. Jews are the most mixed people in the world. All modern-day Arabs on the other hand have a Semitic background and are closely related as genetics and history confirm.
 
Last edited:
.
I am happy my mind is not enslaved by radical Islamic mindset as most members here on PDF, including you!


Yawn... If Israelis are colonists, how come more violence and wars against them only lead to even more loss of Palestinian land, resources and infrastructure? Before Second Intifada, Palestinians had their own independent airport in Gaza and were about to be granted statehood in Camp David Accords but that terrorist Arafat ran away from negotiations, started intifada, and lost everything that was built by years of international aid, including that costly airport:
Yasser Arafat International Airport - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Then you say Israeli colonists are responsible for the mess Palestinians are in? Zionist ideology is simple: Don't attack them, and you will be left in peace. Attack them and all you get is misery and destruction. Jordan and Egypt never attacked Israel since signing of peace treaties and in turn they were never touched by Israeli colonists either! Yet Israel is the problem and not Arab terrorism?


You guys keep trying your so-called popular resistance over and over again, killing, injuring random Israelis every other day which leads to NO change whatsoever in Israeli policy towards Palestine. Why not try something else?


What is wrong with LIVING for your country for once? That's the main difference between Jews and Muslims. Jews live for Israel. Muslims die for Palestine. That's why Jews always win and Muslims always lose. No battle or war was ever won with deaths. It was always won by hearts of those who survived the war. Just look at post-WW2 Europe.
Yes you are slave off those who even to sick things to your family you fee proud
 
.
Total nonsense claim. Those are ancient historical regions predating any 100 year old borders by millenniums. Thanks for confirming what I wrote earlier.
There is nothing historical about Sykes Picot borders. Few examples:

1) During the Ottomans Galilee and Samaria were related to Vilayet Beirut, ie they are "Lebanese".
2) During the Arab rule Galilee and Samaria were related to Jund al Urdun, ie they are "Jordanians".
3) On the other hand Amman was related to Dimashq Vilayet/Jund both under the Arabs and Ottomans, ie they are "Syrians".

No, they did not. Jews are not a race. Hebrews are and they never lived in Morocco or all those other countries. They are also extinct. Have been for centuries upon centuries.
Fact remains: Jews lived in Morocco and Iraq long before the Arabs came there.

All modern-day Arabs on the other hand have a Semitic background and are closely related as genetics and history confirm.
Nonsense. There is a huge portion of Hamites and black Africans among the today Arabs. In Sham region there is a large Indo European mix too. Thats why u can see both blond Arabs and totally black Arabs.

In fact Mizrahi and Ashkenazi Jews are closer related genetically than Sudanese and Lebanese Arabs. I can often fail to differ Ashenazi and Mizrahi, but I will never fail to differ a Lebanese from Sudanese, lol/
 
. .
There is nothing historical about Sykes Picot borders. Few examples:

1) During the Ottomans Galilee and Samaria were related to Vilayet Beirut, ie they are "Lebanese".
2) During the Arab Galilee and Samaria were related to Jund al Urdun, ie they are "Jordanians".
3) On the other hand Amman was related to Dimashq Vilayet/Jund both under the Arabs and Ottomans, ie they are "Syrians".


Fact remains: Jews lived in Morocco and Iraq long before the Arabs came there.


Nonsense. There is a huge portion of Hamites and black Africans among the today Arabs. In Sham region there is Indo European mix too. Thats why u can see both blond Arabs and totally black Arabs.

In fact Mizrahi and Ashkenazi Jews are closer related genetically than Sudanese and Lebanese Arabs. I can often fail to differ Ashenazi and Mizrahi, but I will never fail to differ Lebanese from Sudanese, lol/

Are you dumb? I was talking about the historical regions. They did not change due to the borders. You think that Mesopotamia appeared 100 yeas ago?:lol:

Ottomans became relevant 500 years ago and ended 100 years ago. The history of that part of the Arab world is millennium old. Try harder with the trolling next time my Uzbek friend.

No, they did not as those Jews are just converts. Hebrews (who are long ago extinct) did not step anywhere near Morocco. Quit the joking.

No, it's not nonsense. The only Black people in the Arab world are Afro-Arabs and they are a small minority. There is almost no Sub-Saharan admixture in modern-day Arabs outside of the Afro-Arabs. All genetic tests confirm this.

There is no ethnicity called Indo-European to begin with either. Unless you are going to tell me that a Sri Lankan is related with a Finn.:lol: All Arabs cluster with each other and all of them are native to the same geographical region. West Asia mainly.

Meanwhile Semites all inhabited what is now the Arab world for millenniums and it is only a coincidence that most of us adopted an Arab identity. It could have been any other Semitic people or language.

Mizrahi Jews are Jews from the Arab world. Sudanese people are basically Afro-Arabs and the only such exemption in the Arab world.

Askhenazi Jews look nothing like Mizrahis or Middle Eastern people outside of a few exceptions.

@Hazzy997
 
.
Are you dumb? I was talking about the historical regions. They did not change due to the borders. You think that Mesopotamia appeared 100 yeas ago?:lol:

Ottomans became relevant 500 years ago and ended 100 years ago. The history of that part of the Arab world is millennium old. Try harder with the trolling next time my Uzbek friend.

No, they did not as those Jews are just converts. Hebrews did not step anywhere near Morocco. Quit the joking.

No, it's not nonsense. The only Black people in the Arab world are Afro-Arabs and they are a small minority. There is almost no Sub-Saharan admixture in modern-day Arabs outside of the Afro-Arabs. All genetic tests confirm this.

There is no ethnicity called Indo-European to begin with either. Unless you are going to tell me that a Sri Lankan is related with a Finn.:lol: All Arabs cluster with each other and all of them are native to the same geographical region. West Asia mainly.

Meanwhile Semites all inhabited what is now the Arab world for millenniums and it is only a coincidence that most of us adopted an Arab identity. It could have been any other Semitic people or language.

Mizrahi Jews are Jews from the Arab world. Sudanese people are basically Afro-Arabs and the only such exemption in the Arab world.

@Hazzy997

Only you can produce these golden responses. :D

The guy is trolling us, he admitted once to trolling me and thanked my post. The only time I ever got thanked post by him. He is of Russian ethnicity by the way. He translates a lot of Russian military reports from Russian forums.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom