Thank you for confirming my query whether the civil war will rage on. The fact of the matter is that whether it is armed groups attacking each other or whether it is armed groups attacking the establishment, it is still classified as a civil war. It is however the establishment's duty to stop the fighting or to put an end to it one way or another.
The Kashmir issue will rage on. In another thread I suggested that the inability of the Indian and Pakistani governments to resolve an issue which relates to comparatively what is a small piece of land for both nations, reflects the immaturity of South Asia. Offcourse people such as you and I are not qualified to post possible solutions to the problem. We will be insulting our forebears who tried (whether by means of war or peace negotiations) if we do. But I am certain that you will agree with me that funding armed groups to cross over and launch attacks against what is undisputedly a giant of a nation (India) will yield little if no beneficial results for either Pakistan or the people of Kashmir who want either independence or seccession to Pakistan. Hence my earlier suggestion that whilst groups like LeT will remain no more than a flea to India's rear, it could end up being a machete which chops off Pakistan's right hand. In a nutshell, Pakistan has to develop a diplomatic battle against India which is acceptable to the international community. Funding or even permitting rag tag armed groups in a sovereign state indicates a lack of control by that state.