What's new

Pakistan's 'secret' war in Baluchistan

Status
Not open for further replies.

Whether through the volume of potential commercial activity, or the Iran gas pipeline project, or the enormous untapped mineral resources in Balochistan; Pakistan’s prospects of economic prosperity in the future are inexorably linked to Balochistan

Balochistan is Pakistan’s largest province in terms of land mass, almost 50 percent of the total land mass of the country; has a population of only about 10,000,000 inhabitants, a mere sixteenth of Pakistan’s population. 35 percent are ethnic Baloch, 25 percent Pashtun, and the rest a mixture of Brohi, Mekrani, Sindhi, Hazarvis and Punjabi. However, the recent influx of Afghan refugees coupled with migration of some ethnic Baloch in recent times, has brought the Pashtun population at par with the Baloch, and the influx is an ongoing process, increasing the ethnic imbalance in favour of the Pashtuns.

Bordering Iran to the west, where it lies at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, and southern Afghanistan to its north, it shares borders with each of the other three provinces of Pakistan. It is Pakistan’s richest province in terms of mineral resources; some of the known gas, iron ore, gold, copper, and coal resources are being tapped, but not all. Far greater reserves of oil, gas, gold and other minerals are suspected but remain unconfirmed due to a variety of reasons, insecurity being the leading one.

Not only does the bulk of Pakistan’s coastline lie in Balochistan, the province’s coastline is particularly significant because almost the entire length of it is along a deep shelf, ranging in depth from one hundred to almost three hundred metres. During hostilities with India this has enabled ships to hug the coastline under protection of the naval air arm before making a run for the port at Karachi.

It is this shelf that makes it possible for the strategic deep sea port to be built at Gwadar. For the uninitiated, at a deep sea port, because of the depth of the sea close to shore, naval vessels as well as commercial ships can berth very close to shore. This not only makes loading and unloading ships easier and cheaper, since if berthed at a distance, goods have to be ferried ashore, which adds to the expense, but also provides additional protection in case of hostilities.

Gwadar port is being built with Chinese assistance in three phases, to be completed by 2015, when it will have twenty six berths. Numerous speculations have been made on Pakistan having offered the Chinese a naval presence at Gwadar as an incentive for them to assist in its construction and also construct the strategic coastal highway connecting Karachi to Gwadar.

While there is no disputing that this would provide a major incentive for Chinese assistance, but it does not account for the number of berths, which would be wasted without significant increase in commercial activity.

To understand this, we need to move on to China. Historically, major industrial development in China has been along their East Coast, for ease of shipping. However, conscious of the potential for unrest in the predominantly Muslim province of Xinjiang, to its west, bordering Pakistan and Central Asia, in the aftermath of the fall of the USSR, China constructed an oil pipeline from Kazakhstan to Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang and also set up the national oil refinery there.

Consequently, in addition to the beginning of a demographic shift in this province, over the last fifteen years there has been an enormous growth of industry in this region.

A cursory look at the map will confirm that Urumqi is almost equidistant overland from China’s eastern ports and Gwadar. However, while eastern Chinese ports open onto the Pacific Ocean, leading directly to the Americas, to access European markets or the Middle East, Chinese ships go via the Straits of Malacca across the Indian Ocean to reach the Gulf of Aden; a distance of almost 5000 miles. Whereas, at Gwadar, they are not only at the mouth of the Persian Gulf, but also only 1100 miles from the Gulf of Aden.

China already has a rail link from Almaty, the ex-capital of Kazakhstan, which also lies on the border of Kyrgyzstan, to Urumqi. In addition, a memorandum of understanding has been signed between Pakistan and China for a joint venture constructing a rail link parallel to the Karakoram highway ending at Havelian, for which feasibility studies have been prepared, and from where Pakistan will provide a direct rail link to Gwadar.

Thus not only all Chinese goods produced in western China, but also products from a bulk of Central Asia will be able to take advantage of this route, even if the instability in Afghanistan and Pakistan’s North West Frontier Province denies them the more direct route. Obviously, if these regions stabilise, Gwadar port will be utilised to its fullest capacity.

Analysts have frequently adverted to Pakistan’s ‘strategic location’; linking the Middle East via Iran, Central Asia, China, and South Asia. While Balochistan provides the only direct link to Iran and onwards to the Middle East, the truth is that without Balochistan, the remaining linkages that Pakistan provides to other regions are reduced to less than half their strategic value, since the only other port at Karachi could never handle the magnitude of the potential commerce.

Whether through the volume of potential commercial activity, or the Iran gas pipeline project, or the enormous untapped mineral resources in Balochistan; Pakistan’s prospects of economic prosperity in the future are inexorably linked to Balochistan.

Regretfully, not many decision makers in Pakistan display a consciousness of this fact; nor of the fact that decades of latent dissatisfaction amongst the Baloch is about to spill over the brim.

The author is a retired brigadier. He is also former vice president and founder of the Islamabad Policy Research Institute (IPRI). This article is a modified version of one originally written for The National
 
. .
Yes, it will give other Pakistani's a clear view about the Baloch freedom struggle. And GoP will find no reason to blame India for its internal matters. :undecided:

:rofl: fredom struggle? yes Balochistan is on UN resolution just like Kashmir.


India had been is funding terrorists of BLA in Balochistan. Go and find for your ownself the common Balochs are also terrorized by these Indian-backed Sardars and nawabs besides the BLA terrorists.

I have a Colleague who was threatend by the BLA persons for just being in my organisation which is opposed to BLA terrorists.

The guy is from Balochistan.
 
.
. .
Terrorists are those who are killing innocent baloch people.
He is not killing innocent people, is he fighting with the govt for his cause.
Interesting. Draw a parallel with IHK where innocent civilians are getting killed by Indians. :rolleyes:

Terrorists are taliban, who capture and slaughter innocent people. Have the BLA every killed innocent people ? No.
BLA is a terrorist organisation, partly funded by RAW.
 
.
The deletion of threads here clearly shows exactly how the balochistan movement is supressed by all means by the rest of pakistan.

Baloch liberation army has never targetted unlike external terrorists in kashmir who kill innocents.

Kashmir is discussed in a different thread, and I have voiced my openions.

Kashmir is Off Topic - as the mods would otherwise say.



There is nothing called Balochistan movement if you call the terrorist BLA funded by Indians as a movement no one can help it.


And dont worry about the threads as Indians and Indian RAW is doing a great job by funding and running hunderds of propaganda websites in the name of balochs.

:)
 
.
The deletion of threads here clearly shows exactly how the balochistan movement is supressed by all means by the rest of pakistan.

Baloch liberation army has never targetted unlike external terrorists in kashmir who kill innocents.

Kashmir is discussed in a different thread, and I have voiced my openions.

Kashmir is Off Topic - as the mods would otherwise say.

Dated: 17-04-2008
Talks with BLA: Hoping against the Hope

Khuram Iqbal

A ray of hope for peace has emerged in insurgency-hit Balochistan after the historical February elections in Pakistan. The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) that came out victorious in elections tendered an apology to Balochistan on behalf of the people of Pakistan. The leadership of mainstream political parties also signaled to talk even to people “who have gone to mountains” i.e. Baloch militant groups, to end the insurgency. All the major Baloch nationalist parties responded positively and demonstrated their willingness for a peaceful resolution of the Balochistan’s multifaceted problem by welcoming the apology. But the issue got a new twist on 9 April 2008 when Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), the most prominent militant group, rejected the government’s offer for talks, saying it was not ready even to consider it.

Since peace in Balochistan is crucial for the overall stability, security and prosperity of Pakistan, some questions need to be addressed in order to formulate a comprehensive and flawless strategy for a stable peace in the province.

Is there any negotiable issue to engage BLA into dialogue?

Many believe that the dialogue process in Balochistan is likely to succeed if the government is able to reinforce insurgents’ trust into political process for a durable solution of Balochistan’s problems. However it seems highly unlikely that the BLA would be agreed to negotiate on anything less than an “independent socialist Balochistan”. The BLA in its foundations is a separatist organization. Formed in 1974 by a Marxist Sardar, Khair Bakhsh Marri, the outfit vows to undertake an armed struggle for a separate state of Balochistan with a socialist system.

Moreover, the BLA has experienced radical shifts in its policies and objectives in the last few years. During the course of time the outfit has evolved as a transnational entity that maintains strong relationships with foreign terrorist groups like People Resistance Movement of Iran (Previously known as Jundullah-Iran). At present group’s wider strategy involves the creation of “Greater Balochistan” comprising Afghan, Iranian and Pakistani parts of Balochistan. The BLA has also influenced other armed groups in Balochistan to expend their strategy and gain “independence from the forced occupation of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran”. These other groups like Balochistan Republican Army (BRA) and Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) have also transformed into separatists. Unlike nationalist parties’ active in Balochistan, their demands are no more limited to all the “autonomy minus defense, currency, communications and foreign affairs” but province’s alienation from the federation. Can government negotiate with BLA on the basis of a demand for a separate Balochistan?
Who to Talk with?

Though, deprived of a popular support in the province, a dominating majority of BLA’s foot soldiers are mainly from Marri and Bugti tribes who take oath of allegiance for tribal loyalty and not necessarily committed to the cause of “Greater Balochistan”. Hence, for a successful peace process in Balochistan, there is a need to neutralize the extremist/separatist segment of BLA’s leadership. A little is known about the leadership of BLA. Pakistani authorities believe that Balach Marri, the son of Khair Bakhsh Marri was heading the group until he died in a military operation in November 2007. At present, Barahamdag Bugti is believed to be the head of BLA after the demise of Balach Marri. It merits mentioning here that after the death of Nawab Akbar Bugti in August 2006, hundreds of armed men from Bugti militia joined hands with their arch rivals, the Marris, to fight against a common enemy (the government of Pakistan).

BLA needs a ‘clandestine’ signal to enter into talks

Pakistan's building of its first strategically and economically significant deep-sea port at Gwadar is being negatively viewed by the Indians. In January 2008, Indian Naval Chief stated that Pakistan’s building of Gwadar port has “serious strategic implications for India”. For the very reasons, Indian intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) is believed to be supporting and funding the activities of BLA to create hindrances in the construction of Gwadar port. In January 2005 Pakistani intelligence agencies submitted a report to government, which revealed that RAW, has set up a “Special Operations Division” (SOD) in Balochistan that was assigned the task of creating troubles for the Chinese engineers. The report also disclosed that SOD is providing Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) weapons that are manufactured in Afghanistan. While inviting BLA for talks, the newly elected government of Balochistan must understand that the BLA is not an indigenous movement but an armed group operating on the behest of foreign powers. Legitimacy of the purposed talks with BLA will be open to numerous questions since the group was officially declared, terrorist by the Pakistani and British governments in 2006.

Needless to say, the government’s offer to initiate dialogue with Baloch nationalist parties, the true representatives of Balochs, is likely to produce positive outcomes. However, the prospect of engaging BLA into dialogue doesn’t seem practical. The outfit has never shown any political credentials that are necessary to engage in talks. By rejecting government’s recent offer for talks, BLA has closed all doors for the dialogue with the provincial and federal government. Henceforth, talks with right-minded politicians must take place and the government must demonstrate political will to address the problems faced by Balochistan. The BLA, if sincere with a peaceful resolution of the years old conflict, must understand the new political realities in the province where the elected representatives are exploring ways to address the valid grievances of the people living in Balochistan.

(Khuram Iqbal is a Research Analyst at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University. He was previously a senior researcher at Pak Institute for Peace Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan.)


PIPS - Pakistan Institute For Peace Studies (SouthAsiaNet-PAKISTAN)
 
.
Baloch liberation army has never targetted unlike external terrorists in kashmir who kill innocents.

I would humbly request you that please you don't make a comment about issue you havn't researched thoroughly. Its not like a comment for the sake of comments. Now i undersatnd why your threads would have been deleted.


The BLA Strikes Back


The security and intelligence agencies investigating the November 8 car bombing outside the PIDC House in Karachi, have come to the conclusion that the blast was clearly linked to the September 22 twin-bicycle explosions in Lahore. According to them, both acts of terror, that killed a total of 13 people, were carried out by the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), an ethnic nationalist group which represents the violent side of the Balochi struggle for their rights, which they claim have been denied to them by the establishment.

According to well informed interior ministry sources, security agencies have so far arrested five people for their involvement in the Karachi bomb blast which left three dead and 22 injured. The suspects who, security agencies say, have already confessed to their crimes, reportedly belong to the BLA. One of the suspects, believed to be the mastermind behind the bombing, was arrested from his Malir hideout in Karachi, just a day after the bombing, along with a cache of improvised explosive devices and weapons. The five suspects include a police official, Mohammad Osman, working with the Anti-Car Lifting Cell in Karachi.

A few hours after the Karachi bombing, a BLA spokesman claimed responsibility, saying they detonated the car bomb outside the PIDC (Pakistan Industrial Development Corporation) building, which houses the head office of Pakistan Petroleum Limited (PPL). "We claim responsibility for it," said the BLA spokesman in a telephone call to the Associated Press. "We didn't want to hurt civilians. We did it to protest, and we did it to pressure the government to give us our rights." Intelligence sources said that, taking the lead from the phone call, they were quick to trace the PCO from where the call was made, which led to the mastermind, Aziz Baloch, now in their custody.

"We have arrested the mastermind of the deadly attack, who has been identified as Aziz Baloch, as well as his two accomplices - Mengal Khan and Abdul Jabbar Khan (who was later released for lack of evidence). Aziz and Mengal are brothers," says the DIG Investigation Karachi, Manzoor Mughal. Investigators obtained the registration number of the car in which the suspects had fled, from the blurred images of the CCTV footage recorded by a surveillance camera installed outside the PIDC House.

Apparently, Aziz Baloch parked the explosive-laden car and later got into another car (AJE-056), which was finally intercepted near Gulshan Chowrangi. During interrogations, the accused confessed to having perpetrated the bomb blast to terrorise PPL officials. The police claim that the arrested persons are employees of Bugti House in Karachi.

The intelligence agencies interrogating the Karachi blast suspects now claim that they have found irrefutable evidence showing the BLA's involvement in the September 22 bomb blasts in Lahore. Planted beneath the seat of a bicycle, the first bomb that exploded near a makeshift food stall outside the boundary wall of the Minar-e-Pakistan Park, killed three persons while the second bomb, placed under a wooden platform of a jewellery shop in Ichhra market, killed seven people. Informed sources say that the chassis number of two Eagle cycles used in the explosions led to the arrests of two accused, Rana Ilyas and Jan Maqbool, who allegedly confessed to been given the task by Sardar Behram Khan, the grandson of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti.

According to Karachi police sources, one suspect belongs to the Kalpar clan of the Bugti tribe, and is working for the BLA. During interrogations, Ilyas and Maqbool confessed to the Karachi bomb blast plan and said their men were already in place. A special CIA raiding team from Lahore rushed to Karachi and passed on the information to the Karachi police four days prior to the November 8, Karachi blast. However, the Karachi police failed to preempt the PIDC bomb blast.

Security and the intelligence agencies, point out that a couple of days before the Karachi bombing, Sardar Akbar Bugti had issued statements that the government was about to launch an offensive against him and that this time he could be killed. They, therefore suspect that he might have hired the BLA to do the job. This conspiracy theory is strengthened by the fact that no well known Baloch personality has condemned the Karachi blast.

From time to time, the BLA has claimed responsibility for sabotaging gas pipelines, electricity grids and other civic infrastructures. Being an underground movement, it is difficult to identify the leadership of the group, although clues are available from websites run by Baloch nationalists to the dramatis personae responsible for guerrilla warfare in Pakistan's largest, but poorest, province. The BLA has a loose structure, operates with small, autonomous cells able to carry out acts on their own without directives from above. It is considered an underground organisation, which was born in the Balochistan University many years ago, during the cold war era.

Though nationalists in the resource-rich province, have been waging a low-level battle against central rule for decades, the BLA turned more violent in recent years, launching numerous bomb and rocket attacks against natural gas installations in the area. The BLA demands revolve around the historical and current sense of exploitation and deprivation of the province by the the centre. Till recently, the BLA had confined itself to infrastructure sabotage activity within Balochistan, so it came as a surprise when the BLA claimed resonsibility for the PIDC bomb blast. The BLA, which has been active since early 1999, had upped the ante in March 2005, after an army captain allegedly raped a lady doctor in the high-security residential compound of Pakistan Petroleum Limited in Sui. Hundreds of armed Baloch nationalists subsequently stormed the PPL installations within days of the incident, forcing the government to call in the army. The armed clashes resulted in the deaths of 62 civilians and eight army men, leaving the rape victim, Dr Shazia Khalid, with no other option but to leave the country along with her husband.

The last time the BLA had claimed responsibility for a terror attack was in December 10, 2004, when a powerful bomb exploded next to an army truck in Quetta, killing 11 people and wounding 27 others. Most of the victims were civilians. The BLA later expressed regret over the civilian deaths saying that it was security personnel that were targeted. Its spokesman had stated at the time that the bomb attack was in retaliation against the construction of new cantonments in Balochistan.
 
. .
Baloch separatists call Balochistan an ‘occupied land’

* Expatriate Baloch leader says Baloch people afraid of being turned into minority in their own land
* Wahid Baloch of Baloch Society of North America says Pakistani, Iranian ‘jihadi’ armies carrying out terror campaign against defenceless Balochi civilians

By Khalid Hasan

WASHINGTON: Two Baloch organisations claimed at a press conference at the National Press Club on Friday that there are 700 checkpoints in Balochistan, which they called “an occupied land” littered with military cantonments.

In answer to a question, Wahid Baloch of the Baloch Society of North America asserted that there is nothing wrong with the Sardari system and the Baloch sardars have never hurt their own people, but done their best for them. He ascribed all such allegations to Pakistan “government propaganda”.

Minority: Another expatriate Baloch leader Ahmar Mustikhan said that the Baloch people are afraid of being turned into a minority in their own land. He also asserted that Balochistan was never a part of Pakistan and that the treaty signed by the Pakistan government with the ruler of Kalat was signed under coercion. He also called the Pakistan army a “jihadi” force deployed against the Baloch people. He charged that Pakistan was involved in the 9/11 attacks, besides holding it responsible for the upheaval and fighting in Afghanistan. But for the sanctuaries Pakistan provides to the Taliban and Al Qaeda, there would be peace in Afghanistan, he declared.

Wahid Baloch told the thinly-attended news conference that the Pakistan army is “Taliban in uniform holding US arms”. He also questioned Pakistan’s sincerity as a US ally in the war against terrorism.

Terror campaign: He called Pakistan the main source of terrorism. He said the Pakistani and Iranian “jihadi” armies cannot fight the Indian and Israeli armies, but are carrying out a terror campaign against defenceless Balochi civilians. “The genocide of the Baloch nation is continuing on both sides of the border. The US F16s and Cobra gunship helicopters given to Pakistan to hunt down Taliban terrorists are being used in Balochistan against innocent, secular Balochi people. He accused the army of having attacked a village in Dera Bugti last week and killing 48 people, while arresting hundreds, who were later taken to a military camp and “summarily executed in Nazi style”. Their bodies, he alleged, were dumped in mass graves. He said just because the majority of Baloch people is Muslim does not give Iran and Pakistan the right to continue to occupy their lands, plunder their resources and kill them at random. He said Pakistan had carried out its 1998 nuclear test in Balochistan without the consent of the Baloch people.

The American Friends of Balochistan and the Baloch Society of North America, were joined by Dr Nazir Bhatti, editor of the Pakistan Christian Post, who demanded an end to the “killings of Christians” and adequate representation in parliament after an unbiased population census. “There were five elected members in Pakistan Assembly of 1948, in house of 48 and which are decreased to four seats when house constitutes with 342 members in 2008. A transparent census is very important issue in for the Christians to get their due share,” Bhatti said. He called on US Congress to place an embargo on all military supplies and equipment to Pakistan until it grants the Baloch people the right to self-determination, hands over terrorists like AQ Khan, Osama bin Laden, Ayman Alzwahiri, Daud Ebrahim and Rashid Rauf to the US and rolls back its nuclear weapons programme.

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
.
Nobody buys this crap. Anybody can bark like this. ^

I wonder why the United States doesn't hands over these terrorists if they live there! These issues should be in Hamid Mir's programme! :lol: Where is Jana.. ring the bell please..
 
.
"Wahid Baloch of the Baloch Society of North America asserted that there is nothing wrong with the Sardari system and the Baloch sardars have never hurt their own people, but done their best for them."

:rofl:

Yeah right. Now we know how credible his claims are.

The larger Sardars, including the late Bugti, operated private militias, private jails and torture centers. Bugti abused his power to force thousands of his own clansmen to leave their ancestral homes. Despite many of these Sardars getting millions from royalties etc., not a lick of development in their territories - and this guy has the gall to say the Sardari system has been good fro the people. It may have been, pre-Independence, but not post.

Now, as far as development goes, successive governments in Pakistan don't have a much better record either, and continuing to cater to these Sardar's has only exacerbated the development gap.

Its time for the provincial government to be given more autonomy to undertake more programs at the local level.
 
.
"Wahid Baloch of the Baloch Society of North America asserted that there is nothing wrong with the Sardari system and the Baloch sardars have never hurt their own people, but done their best for them."

:rofl:

Yeah right. Now we know how credible his claims are.

The larger Sardars, including the late Bugti, operated private militias, private jails and torture centers. Bugti abused his power to force thousands of his own clansmen to leave their ancestral homes. Despite many of these Sardars getting millions from royalties etc., not a lick of development in their territories - and this guy has the gall to say the Sardari system has been good fro the people. It may have been, pre-Independence, but not post.

Now, as far as development goes, successive governments in Pakistan don't have a much better record either, and continuing to cater to these Sardar's has only exacerbated the development gap.

Its time for the provincial government to be given more autonomy to undertake more programs at the local level.

Still, its the choice of the people of Balochistan. I am sure that the Sardars are not the devils that you make them out to be.

In any case, Balochis have gained next to nothing from being a part of Pakistan so far, except face the brutality of the Pakistani forces.
 
.
Still, its the choice of the people of Balochistan. I am sure that the Sardars are not the devils that you make them out to be.

Its not what I make them out to be - its what exists in the territories they control, and rule over as their personal fiefdoms.

Why are the areas under their control some of the most backward and underdeveloped?

Where are all the schools and hospitals and roads?

The Sardar's derive their power from their people remaining 'Tribal'. Why would someone aspiring to get an engineering or medical degree enroll in a Sardar's private militia?

For the system to perpetuate lack of development is essential.

Thats a pretty good reason why his claims are not credible.

In any case, Balochis have gained next to nothing from being a part of Pakistan so far, except face the brutality of the Pakistani forces.
The militants have faced 'brutality', not the average Baluchi, not any more than the collateral damage that is an unfortunate part of military operations anywhere.

Thankfully the collateral damage in Balochistan has been much lower than what we see in FATA even.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom