Pakistan's PM Imran Khan admit discrimination was the cause of Bangladesh

[UKBengali]

I wasn't even born back then. But I admit the some of the govt at that time neglected east Pakistan...especially Ayyub Khan so but here many govt have neglected one region or the other but that does not mean we resort to terrorism and treason and join anti-Pakistan forces for our rights. That cannot be justified. East Pakistanis instead resorted to taking up arms and helping the enemy and that's treason under any international law and totally condemnable so two wrongs did make one good.

You for real?

East Pakistan WAS in essence Pakistan as it had the majority population. You cannot compare it to say Sindh that may have contained a few per cent of the total population of the country.

Treason? The majority cannot be traitors by definition. Only traitors were the minority that wanted to rule over the dominant ethnic group.

 

[Joe Shearer]

It just another one of these threads bhai.... its tiring. Like watching a movie (no matter how entertaining it was once first) on a never-ending loop.



Wait i own some veto in Pakistan? *rubs hands* @Joe Shearer

In Pakistan, and from long before, in Bangladesh too.

 

[Avicenna]

Think your mama got a big PA love stick in the bay of bengal 1971 in every hole while your papa watched, hence your username.............

No wonder you bengali men cannot stop your women from being sex slaves of hindu indians and being sodomized by them..............:

https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangla...wing-number-bangladeshi-women-indian-brothels

Keep it classy. SMH.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Keep it classy. SMH.

True. I am starting to believe he's an indian pretending to be a bengali.

 

[Michael Corleone]

I didn't get you. Can you elaborate please of what you are referring to?

east india company/ british raj

And here you are, traitors to the idea of Pakistan.

Actually, Bengal was under gulami for 400 years. Pakistan was only conquered in the middle of the 1800s. So we were only gulams for just about 100 years.

gulam for 400 years or gulam for 100 years... or even 1 day... is still gulams...
watch your prime ministers speech from yesterday... people in the east became traitors in your eyes because you broke them.... same happened with the german jews... for a small example

 

[MBT 3000]

east india company/ british raj


gulam for 400 years or gulam for 100 years... or even 1 day... is still gulams...
watch your prime ministers speech from yesterday... people in the east became traitors in your eyes because you broke them.... same happened with the german jews... for a small example

and biharis traitors for bengalis?

 

[Rusty]

east india company/ british raj


gulam for 400 years or gulam for 100 years... or even 1 day... is still gulams...
watch your prime ministers speech from yesterday... people in the east became traitors in your eyes because you broke them.... same happened with the german jews... for a small example

not really, we actually put up a fight to the point where we were the last to be conqured. we also don't have a repeating history of Mir Jafars.

The East didn't become traitors in my eyes. I am actually very sympathetic to them (minus the language nonsense). They became traitors to the idea of Pakistan.

 

[LegitimateIdiot]

Finally pm of Pakistan admit the mistreatment of Bengali which cause break up of Pakistan in 1971 .

আন্তর্জাতিক
The deprivation was the main cause of Bangladesh's creation, said Imran

Online Desk
December 23, 2011, 13:49
Updated: December 23, 2014, 14:31


In the early hours of this month, violent incidents took place in the Bulandshah district of Uttar Pradesh. Two people including the police were killed in this. Nasiruddin Shah came under the controversy by commenting on the death case.


Nasiruddin Shah said in an interview that a cow's death is more important than death of a police officer in India.

In an event organized in Lahore on the occasion of 100 days of Punjab government, Imran said his government is taking steps to ensure the right to religious minorities in Pakistan. The country's founder Muhammad Ali Jinnah also had such dreams.

Imran said his government will ensure that minorities feel secure, security, and they get equal rights in new Pakistan.

The Prime Minister said, "How will we deal with minorities, we will show Modi government."

According to Imran, the people of India say that the minorities here are not being used as equal citizens.

The Prime Minister said, if the weak people do not get proper treatment then they will become a coup.

In this regard, Imran has set example of East Pakistan. He said that people of East Bengal (East Pakistan) were not given their rights. This was the main reason behind the creation of Bangladesh.

• আন্তর্জাতিক
• পাকিস্তান

বঞ্চনাই ছিল বাংলাদেশ সৃষ্টির প্রধান কারণ, বললেন ইমরান

অনলাইন ডেস্ক
২৩ ডিসেম্বর ২০১৮, ১৩:৪৯
আপডেট: ২৩ ডিসেম্বর ২০১৮, ১৪:৩১


চলতি মাসের শুরুর দিকে ভারতের উত্তর প্রদেশের বুলান্দশার জেলায় কথিত গোহত্যা নিয়ে সহিংস ঘটনা ঘটে। এতে পুলিশসহ দুজন নিহত হন। এই মৃত্যুর ঘটনা নিয়ে মন্তব্য করে বিতর্কের মুখে পড়েন নাসিরুদ্দিন শাহ।


নাসিরুদ্দিন শাহ এক সাক্ষাৎকারে বলেন, ভারতে একজন পুলিশ কর্মকর্তার মৃত্যুর চেয়ে একটি গরুর মৃত্যু বেশি গুরুত্ব পায়।

পাঞ্জাব সরকারের ১০০ দিনের অর্জন উপলক্ষে লাহোরে আয়োজিত এক অনুষ্ঠানে ইমরান বলেন, পাকিস্তানে ধর্মীয় সংখ্যালঘুদের ন্যায্য অধিকার নিশ্চিত করতে তাঁর সরকার পদক্ষেপ নিচ্ছে। দেশটির প্রতিষ্ঠাতা মোহাম্মদ আলী জিন্নাহরও এমন স্বপ্ন ছিল।

ইমরান বলেন, সংখ্যালঘুরা যাতে নিরাপত্তা, সুরক্ষা অনুভব করে, নতুন পাকিস্তানে তারা যাতে সমান অধিকার পায়, তার সরকার তা নিশ্চিত করবে।

পাকিস্তানের প্রধানমন্ত্রী বলেন, ‘কীভাবে সংখ্যালঘুদের সঙ্গে ব্যবহার করতে হয়, তা আমরা মোদি সরকারকে দেখিয়ে দেব।’

ইমরানের ভাষ্য, এখন ভারতের লোকজনই বলছে, সেখানকার সংখ্যালঘুরা সমান নাগরিক হিসেবে ব্যবহার পাচ্ছে না।

পাকিস্তানের প্রধানমন্ত্রী বলেন, দুর্বলেরা যদি যথাযথ আচরণ না পায়, তাহলে তা অভ্যুত্থানে রূপ নেবে।

এ প্রসঙ্গে ইমরান পূর্ব পাকিস্তানের উদাহরণ টানেন। তিনি বলেন, পূর্ব বাংলার (পূর্ব পাকিস্তান) জনগণকে তাদের অধিকার দেওয়া হয়নি। বাংলাদেশ সৃষ্টির পেছনে এটাই ছিল প্রধান কারণ।


[emoji767] স্বত্ব প্রথম আলো ১৯৯৮ - ২০১৮
সম্পাদক ও প্রকাশক: মতিউর রহমান
প্রগতি ইনস্যুরেন্স ভবন,২০-২১ কারওয়ান বাজার , ঢাকা ১২১৫
ফোন: ৮১৮০০৭৮-৮১, ফ্যাক্স: ৯১৩০৪৯৬,ইমেইল: info@prothomalo.com

It also had to do with Bangladesh not accepting Urdu as a national language . Having Two official languages comes with a lot of difficulties

 

[LegitimateIdiot]

Americans droned you because of your own doing. You guys chest thump about nukes and military power and lecture others about sovereignty when your own country is droned. Your own intelligence agency handed over Afia Siddique, have some shame shameless creature.

You always thought amrikans were your allies, you were even hoping amrika would come to your rescue in 71, they did not. There was no need for them to help a slave, and you guys proved them right. Only few years after amrikan dumped you in 71, you went all bonkers helping them against the Soviets. Then they proved your servitude again right after the end of Soviet Afghan war they didn't even supply the f16s you paid for. Then again you proved your servitude by joining then in the Afghan invasion by the Americans, ending up stalling your progress for 17 years and counting, your country became terrorist infested and seeking bailout. Look at the mirror once in a while.

Actually America did try to send aircraft carriers to the bay of Bengal but India's soviet ally sent navy ships over there and stopped the American Fleet.

 

[LegitimateIdiot]

Ahhh just what Allah warned us Infighting between Muslims makes it easier for the Enemy to break us apart....

 

[Bengal71]

Actually America did try to send aircraft carriers to the bay of Bengal but India's soviet ally sent navy ships over there and stopped the American Fleet.

Yes they did but they didn't have enough resolve to take on the Soviets for a country like Pakistan. Otherwise they didn't fear facing Soviets in Vietnam or Afghanistan.

 

[Fortress]

Needs something formal from the Pakistani state passed in Parliament.

If this is done, I can guarantee that Hasina would lose her anti-Pakistan card and relations would be close economically and militarily.

Pakistan is constrained because of their pride. They will try to make it a "BD was in the wrong here" issue even though it is fact that Bhutto and Yahya Khan tried to prevent Sheikh Mujib from gaining his democratically elected term in office.

I often defend Pakistanis as a whole when the whole ethnic and language angle comes up by pointing out that West Pakistanis are not Urdu, they are not all to blame and that the language was forced on to them by the Government the same way it was onto Bengalis. Their native languages are Punjabi, Pashto, Kashmiri, Sindhi and Baloch. This whole conflict was political, and the only ethnic angle was that these criminals in power did not want Bengalis taking power away from them even if for this one term.

Some Pakistanis try to undermine this by pushing the narrative that BD just wanted to gain independence regardless, but that is illogical because why would Sheikh Mujib want to be president of JUST Bangladesh when he could have and would have been president of BOTH East and West Pakistan?

Pakistan is a heavily sectarian country. There are ethnic divisions, religious divisions and tribal divisions. It is why it happened then, and why the same conflicts persist in Pakistan today. At least I find some happiness that Pashtuns are treated better now than they were back then, but at the same time Pashtuns are heavily tribal and it is a reason why there exist Jihadist groups who are against Pakistan because of tribal allegiances.

 

[Nilgiri]

Yes they did but they didn't have enough resolve to take on the Soviets for a country like Pakistan. Otherwise they didn't fear facing Soviets in Vietnam or Afghanistan.

US had Vietnam war ongoing at the time too. Its why that CBG (enterprise) was even in the vicinity in the first place. It was not a regular deployment, there were assets commited to a theater in the area already for the US....so it was always just going to be posturing at best...and not really a hard bluff for India + USSR to call.

 

[Bengal71]

It also had to do with Bangladesh not accepting Urdu as a national language . Having Two official languages comes with a lot of difficulties

It doesn't come with any difficulty, India has many official languages and more united than ever and prosperous.

US had Vietnam war ongoing at the time too. Its why that CBG (enterprise) was even in the vicinity in the first place. It was not a regular deployment, there were assets commited to a theater in the area already for the US....so it was always just going to be posturing at best...and not really a hard bluff for India + USSR to call.

Maybe, but even if they were not involved in the Vietnam war or any war, I doubt they would get into a conflict with the Soviets just for the sake of Pakistan. They never considered Pakistan or any other Muslim country as an ally, they are here to pay lip service to Muslim countries as long as it's in their interest. You know how they deal with countries like KSA, they have lot of monetary and strategic interests in there, so they give lip service, with the Orang Utan in power he didn't bother about any diplomatic norms and said it the way it is.

 

[American Pakistani]

east india company/ british raj

How 400 yrs? Afaik it was 100 yrs.