What's new

Pakistan's ISI exposed

Skeptic

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
1,146
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India

Just that the speaker is Christine Fair makes the video more interesting. She is quite well known to fellow members as the lady who exposed Indian Hand in Baluchistan to the Western World. Here are her views about Pakistan and ISI.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
its a part of campaign, propaganda against pakistan to do more. pathetic post mate

Sir, with all due respect, this is much better than a lot of propaganda being posted here. I have already mentioned the context in which I have posted it. I may or may not agree entirely with what is being by Ms. Fair, but then I did not agree with something else she said earlier as well.

You are entitled to your opinion, I am entitled to mine and Ms Fair is entitled to her opinion. What's so "pathetic" about it, it was not so when she was "proving" the Indian hand? why was that not appeasement of Pakistan if this is a "propaganda"to motivate them?
 
Sir, with all due respect, this is much better than a lot of propaganda being posted here. I have already mentioned the context in which I have posted it. I may or may not agree entirely with what is being by Ms. Fair, but then I did not agree with something else she said earlier as well.

You are entitled to your opinion, I am entitled to mine and Ms Fair is entitled to her opinion. What's so "pathetic" about it, it was not so when she was "proving" the Indian hand? why was that not appeasement of Pakistan if this is a "propaganda"to motivate them?

Wats pathectic boss is that you putting up such video's these scenes have already happend and now wat you wana do start up tensions between members plzz stop the hatered works towards peace and this goes for Pakistani members as well there is no reason go backwards if anything iam sure members will find videos against India wat then a back & forth drama for no reason be logical in all due respect thats wat you should motivate PEACE to others and to start of with your self ! :wave:
 
Anybody please ask her what America was doing in 1980s during the Soviet Afghan war?
 
And as for her she seems to be brainwashed and on some serious drugs!!

acidwolf

Anybody please ask her what America was doing in 1980s during the Soviet Afghan war?
Today 09:51 PM

Guy's she was the same lady saying India was/is supporting and funding baloch movement with Irans help. Then she was not brainwash or on drugs!!! Right!!!
 
Guy's she was the same lady saying India was/is supporting and funding baloch movement with Irans help. Then she was not brainwash or on drugs!!! Right!!!

Hell i even saw some of the members putting up articles from rand organistation as a proof of Indian involvement in Baluchistan. Holy Lord, surely she actually might have been sober when she wrote up that report and might have been on drugs when she did the piece on ISI.....wait......i know whats coming next, RAW paid her to do this report !!!! (i wont be surprised if someone said that) :pop:
 
Guy's she was the same lady saying India was/is supporting and funding baloch movement with Irans help. Then she was not brainwash or on drugs!!! Right!!!

Lol no acutally she was once a crackhead always a crackhead :hitwall: :cheesy:
 
Towards the end she states that there is no evidence linking the Pakistani establishment to the Mumbai attacks - that has also been borne out by later events, since India's own dossier stated that no Pakistani institutional links were found.

So what exactly is the story here?
 
Wats pathectic boss is that you putting up such video's these scenes have already happend and now wat you wana do start up tensions between members plzz stop the hatered works towards peace and this goes for Pakistani members as well there is no reason go backwards if anything iam sure members will find videos against India wat then a back & forth drama for no reason be logical in all due respect thats wat you should motivate PEACE to others and to start of with your self ! :wave:

Towards the end she states that there is no evidence linking the Pakistani establishment to the Mumbai attacks - that has also been borne out by later events, since India's own dossier stated that no Pakistani institutional links were found.

So what exactly is the story here?

The story actually very simple:
The intention is not to prove that ISI is the most Evil organization in the world, nor it is to induce hate among the members.

This is not to malign either Pakistan or ISI but primarily to malign the credibility of Ms. Fair as a objective and balanced observer. She also seems equally delusional and sways either ways. Acts as generally members out here have pointed out a "crackhead" and is not a very reliable commentator. Her comments about ISI and GoP carry as much weight as they do about Indian Participation in Baluchistan.

She keeps on Blaming everyone left right and center.

PS: She did not say no evidence but said not enough Evidence.
 
Last edited:
Towards the end she states that there is no evidence linking the Pakistani establishment to the Mumbai attacks - that has also been borne out by later events, since India's own dossier stated that no Pakistani institutional links were found.

So what exactly is the story here?

Pakistan army officer Colonel R Saadatullah posted at Special Communication Organisation of the Pakistan governmentm,Rawalpindi, his office room IP address had found been used to make internet calls to the terrorists involved in mumbai attack...

http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0226/p99s01-duts.html
 
FANATICISM IS PATRIOTISM FOR RELIGION,PATRIOTISM IS FANATICISM FOR COUNTRY
We are all FANATICS here....:cool:
 
Pakistan army officer Colonel R Saadatullah posted at Special Communication Organisation of the Pakistan governmentm,Rawalpindi, his office room IP address had found been used to make internet calls to the terrorists involved in mumbai attack...

India accuses Pakistani Army officer of involvement in Mumbai attacks | csmonitor.com

These excerpts from the article are important in establishing that there is no evidence indicating the complicity of the Pakistani establishment in the Mumbai attacks.

However, the Pakistan army downplayed its link to the Mumbai terror carnage and said that the chargesheet filed on Wednesday is very vague on the link.

Speaking to TIMES NOW, Brigadier Azmat Ali, Pak army spokesperson said, "[The] chargesheet does not accurately identify armyman allegedly linked to 26/11. There are many Colonel Sadatullahs in the Pakistan army. We are trying to find out if this is true or it is all a media speculation."

On Wednesday, Indian police charged Pakistani national Mohammed Ajmal Amir Qasab, the lone surviving gunman of the Mumbai attacks, along with two Indian nationals, with "waging war" against India, reports the BBC. All three could face the death penalty.

The BBC report adds, however, that the Pakistani Army has not been directly implicated in the Mumbai attacks.

[The charge sheet] does not establish any connection to the underworld of Mumbai nor does it mention any Inter-Services Intelligence (Pakistan intelligence agency) or Pakistani army officials.


As Mr. Qasab's trial begins, the Pakistani authorities have "raised the prospect that Indian authorities could have padded evidence to buttress its claims that Pakistani nationals were involved in the attacks," reports the Indian daily, The Hindu.

Last month, Islamabad submitted a 30-point questionnaire to New Delhi, in response to a formal dossier of evidence handed over by India. For the most part, the questionnaire sought evidence that will be needed for a possible criminal trial of Lashkar terrorists in that country.

But, government sources told The Hindu, several elements of the questionnaire have caused disquiet – among them, thinly-veiled insinuations that evidence was tampered with and allegations that the role of Indian nationals in facilitating the attack were being glossed over.
 
This is not to malign either Pakistan or ISI but primarily to malign the credibility of Ms. Fair as a objective and balanced observer. She also seems equally delusional and sways either ways. Acts as generally members out here have pointed out a "crackhead" and is not a very reliable commentator. Her comments about ISI and GoP carry as much weight as they do about Indian Participation in Baluchistan.

She keeps on Blaming everyone left right and center.

PS: She did not say no evidence but said not enough Evidence.
Skeptic - I don't see how her credibility is marred with this excerpt. She correctly pointed out the links of the military with the LeT, and she correctly pointed out that there was not enough evidence linking the Pakistani establishment with the Mumbai attacks.

I suppose 'not enough' would have to be used instead of 'no evidence' since Pakistan's old links with the LeT wil always create doubts.

But again, I do not see how you can conclude her credibility is marred with this - if anything, she has proven herself to be objective and willing to call Pakistan out on issues where she believes Pakistan is at fault. That enhances her credibility - she is not partial to any one side.
 
Last edited:

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom