Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ Indian Jatt and Jagjinatt, I am in no way condoning banning these websites but there has to be some restrictions on what these popular websites are used for. Like Facebook and Youtube, disallow nudity becuase it might cause offence, they can also moderate such pages for the views being openly put forward.
If it was freedom of speech then there are better ways of countering a group rather than being utterly offensive. It is clear that this is attracting all the bigots and their views are despicable.
Banning is not the answer, but it might lead to the required end. That is getting the pages removed while also keeping the extremist muslims from making any unwanted moves of destruction and damage.
Do not take her too seriously, she is rabidly anti-Pakistan but she has the rights to express her views and people change once they get to know something which is in contrast to what they have in mind.
Just play along.
@ Samika, I am in my cave, pesky woods will not light up, care to help.
great another person saying:
****=BLASPHEMY=****
**** SHOULD BE MUST BE BANNED
however, **** & blashpemy are NOT the same thing!!!
I understand what you are trying to say and you and I'm okay with you believing that but I cannot disagree more. A court or an institute or the state should not have the right to make a decision regarding what people can access online. Nothing can justify the denial of access to information online or offline, however short the duration be. As Jehanara put on her blog yesterday "I dont need the government to make such decisions for me. I am quite capable of doing that for myself. If I want to protest against something I find offensive, I will (and I do). The PTA and the courts have no right to deprive me of my freedom to do so."
@ Indian Jatt and Jagjinatt, I am in no way condoning banning these websites but there has to be some restrictions on what these popular websites are used for. Like Facebook and Youtube, disallow nudity becuase it might cause offence, they can also moderate such pages for the views being openly put forward.
If it was freedom of speech then there are better ways of countering a group rather than being utterly offensive. It is clear that this is attracting all the bigots and their views are despicable.
Banning is not the answer, but it might lead to the required end. That is getting the pages removed while also keeping the extremist muslims from making any unwanted moves of destruction and damage.
Yes !!! You planning to join us?
The ban on certain websites will not take us back to Stone Age. Besides, these sites are pure entertainment sites and not business oriented websites.
my friend if you can answer THIS question you would understand WHY the partition was necessary!!
if others don't do it we shouldn't! what logic is that? that is such a complexed approach in life!!
we as a nation SHOULDN'T BE RADICAL! however we should be VOCAL! in our stand for the prophet for the religion!!
the other muslim nations are PUPPETS of the US!
we as a nation denounce all forms of TERRORISM in the name of religion but we also denounce all forms of blasphemy for any religion!!
be it hindu,muslim,sikh,christian or jew!
Say if we do not ban these, we might see a stupid reaction on our streets that will cause damage to us alone because our people cannot understand or comprehend a situation.
Wikipedia also banned, some one ban me as well
i want to ask why people don't protest against the **** sites?