Pakistani Representative shows wrong pic at UN - Indian media erupts

[Solomon2]

Are you suggesting the the insurgency was not locally led? Because if that is what you are suggesting you are wrong.

Read the book. Is it "locally led" when locals who want to lead differently are assassinated by Pakistani agents?

 

[Chellam]

Nobody in Balochistan wants freedom from Pakistan.

But people in Kashmir wants freedom from India.

That is for sure.

Don't compromise your self-saying Balochistan don't want freedom,

read the more news and comment if you don't know anything about it

 

[AMCA]

Your economy isn't even larger than Japan's.
For 1.3 billion people.

At least we've not been featured in the failed nations index. Pretty decent.

 

[MultaniGuy]

Read the book. Is it "locally led" when locals who want to lead differently are assassinated by Pakistani agents?

I have not "read" the book so I cannot comment on your post.

By the way why are beating around the bush?

I thought you said Kashmir only had a choice between Pakistan or India.

By the way if the Kashmiris do not want Pakistan but want independence I can accept that.

At least we've not been featured in the failed nations index. Pretty decent.

Its called the fragile states index and it is done by and American Think tank.

There is an agenda to it.

Don't compromise your self-saying Balochistan don't want freedom,

read the more news and comment if you don't know anything about it

Come to Balochistan and see for yourself then what the people want.

 

[Solomon2]

I have not "read" the book so I cannot comment on your post.
By the way why are beating around the bush?
I thought you said Kashmir only had a choice between Pakistan or India.
By the way if the Kashmiris do not want Pakistan but want independence I can accept that.

The book also discusses the fate - at Pakistani hands - of Kashmiris who wanted independence.

 

[MultaniGuy]

The book also discusses the fate - at Pakistani hands - of Kashmiris who wanted independence.

Yes but a whole referendum needs to take place in all of Kashmir.

 

[Chellam]

I have not "read" the book so I cannot comment on your post.

By the way why are beating around the bush?

I thought you said Kashmir only had a choice between Pakistan or India.

By the way if the Kashmiris do not want Pakistan but want independence I can accept that.


Its called the fragile states index and it is done by and American Think tank.

There is an agenda to it.


Come to Balochistan and see for yourself then what the people want.

Why I need to come, News feed is enough for me

 

[MultaniGuy]

Why I need to come, News feed is enough for me

Whatever floats your boat

 

[AMCA]

Its called the fragile states index and it is done by and American Think tank.

There is an agenda to it.

I am all ears and what might that be?

 

[Solomon2]

Yes but a whole referendum needs to take place in all of Kashmir.

And if the Kashmiris today chose India - as they did in 1965 - then Pakistan would never accept it, right?

The Kashmiris don't have the strength themselves to defend against a Pakistani response, so the result would be another India-Pakistan war - this time with nuclear weapons.

So until Kashmiris can be assured Pakistan would accept a democratic referendum regardless of its outcome the time is not right for a referendum.

 

[MultaniGuy]

And if the Kashmiris today chose India - as they did in 1965 - then Pakistan would never accept it, right?

The Kashmiris don't have the strength themselves to defend against a Pakistani response, so the result would be another India-Pakistan war - this time with nuclear weapons.

So until Kashmiris can be assured Pakistan would accept a democratic referendum regardless of its outcome the time is not right for a referendum.

If the Kashmiris want India, then I could accept that.

But everything has to be done in a referendum.

challenge accepted.

I do not know if the Kashmiris accepted India in 1965.

Where did you pull that from?

No Pakistan would have no choice but to accept that. Because that is democracy.

 

[Solomon2]

If the Kashmiris want India, then I could accept that.
But everything has to be done in a referendum.
challenge accepted.

You're just one person. You'd have to work to shape Pakistani public opinion to accept a Kashmir that chooses to remain with India.

No Pakistan would have no choice but to accept that. Because that is democracy.

Pakistan didn't accept Bengali rule or Bangladeshi independence in 1971 even though that's what democracy called for. Why would today be different?

 

[MultaniGuy]

You're just one person. You'd have to work to shape Pakistani public opinion to accept a Kashmir that chooses to remain with India.

Pakistan didn't accept Bengali rule or Bangladeshi independence in 1971 even though that's what democracy called for. Why would today be different?

I do not know what happened in East Pakistan. However if the democracy at that time was in favour of Mujib, then Mujib should have won.

You're just one person. You'd have to work to shape Pakistani public opinion to accept a Kashmir that chooses to remain with India.

Pakistan didn't accept Bengali rule or Bangladeshi independence in 1971 even though that's what democracy called for. Why would today be different?

Now dont beat around the bush.

All Pakistanis would accept that if Kashmir wanted to be with India, then it should be with India.

But a plebiscite would have to be held.

India must also accept that if Kashmiris want Pakistan, then kashmir should go to Pakistan.

Your challenge is accepted.

You have yourself a deal Solomon2. Its all about what the Kashmiris want.

This is what Pakistan wanted all along.

However, the Muslims on Pakistani Kashmir want to stay with Pakistan.

 

[Solomon2]

Its all about what the Kashmiris want. This is what Pakistan wanted all along -

Falsifying history in an attempt to favor your case is not a convincing endeavor.

 

[MultaniGuy]

It is India which has not implemented the UN resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir.

Falsifying history in an attempt to favor your case is not a convincing endeavor.

I disagree with you.
And since you have an anti-Muslim slant or bias, you too lose all credibility as well.

Pakistan has always been in favour of implementing the UN resolutions, but India has been too cowardly to implement them.

Falsifying history in an attempt to favor your case is not a convincing endeavor.

Same with you sweetiepie You and your anti-Muslim bias.

I should have ignored you but exposing your flawed arguments on this forum is so much more satisfying and rewarding for other members to see.