Pakistani position in any Iran/US conflict

[Pakhtoon yum]

You don't know Pakistan as well as I do. It's all about money. Whoever pays them most, Pakistani politicians and generals will be on their side. That's how India has been able to keep Kashmir for 70 years.

- PRTP GWD

And how do you know Pakistan?

 

[jericho]

And how do you know Pakistan?

From GobarSwamy talk show probably where every night is dedicated to Pakistan

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

And how do you know Pakistan?

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/open...an-india-world-cup-matches-were-fixed.624915/

- PRTP GWD

 

[Pakhtoon yum]

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/open...an-india-world-cup-matches-were-fixed.624915/

- PRTP GWD

Again wtf?

 

[PakFactor]

The main fallout will be on the KSA/GCC!! And, Pak might not remain oblivious to that...

The War for Iran got done in 1979...

Now, it’s the war for the Haremain...

The Haremain can’t be destroyed and removed from the Hearts of the Muslims unless the Last Castles of Islam -Pak and Turkey - are removed from the scene....

When the dust settles down the Ay-Yildiz (Hilal ve Sitara) will still be gracefully fluttering by HIS PERMISSION...

Salaam

Can you follow up as I have some questions I want to ask you directly

 

[LeGenD]

Being NEUTRAL is best way forward for us.

A lot of members are saying that Pakistan should not cave in to American demands. First of all unlike Afghanistan US has direct access to Iran. They have well established bases all around the Iran throughout GCC.

So why do you think US needs us for???

@JonAsad @HRK @waz @Mav3rick @That Guy @Path-Finder @Alternatiiv @-blitzkrieg- @The Eagle @Dubious

Well said.

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

Again wtf?

It's a metaphor/allegory.

- PRTP GWD

 

[Pakhtoon yum]

It's a metaphor/allegory.

- PRTP GWD

Just stop

 

[Kaniska]

Pakistan should stay Neutral.

This is a food for thought for all the Pakistan posters here.
When Arabs are pretending to be neutal in Kashmir issue, they are abused left and right.Why can not Iran feel the same when Pakistan poster pretend to stay neutral for a situation in Iran that demands all the Muslim countries to support Iran?

Then what is the need of all these talk of Muslim unity and new group with Turkey, Malaysia and Iran when you guys can not even stand with each other when some one need your support desperately??

@ArabianEmpires&Caliphates @Arian @Indus Pakistan @Serpentine

 

[Indus Pakistan]

Being NEUTRAL is best way forward for us.

Are you suggesting we should be neutral to a enemy like Iran. Have you forgotten -

• Iran attacked Pakistan border towns in balochistan
• Ira bombed Pakistan border towns
• Iran worked with India, Israel and USA to send spies to Pakistan
• Iran supports terrorism in Pakistan

We need to join Israel, Saudia and US to destroy this Shia nest ...

 

[Patriot786b2]

Watch General Soleimani assassination is equal to General Zia Ul Haq's assassination by CIA.
When Pakistan during late 1980's was getting stronger by the down fall of Soviet Empire in Afghanistan, the Americans quickly killed General Zia through third party parties in order for Pakistan to remain submissive. This act of killing General Soleimani is totally equal to killing Genreal Zia Ul Haq back than as he was expert in Spying process and could predict U.S. forces movement in 2 days advance for the Iranian forces along the border. Similiarly General Zia was going to purchace 200 M1-Abrams main battle tanks for Pak Army before he was killed. May he Rest in Peace.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

You don't know Pakistan as well as I do. It's all about money. Whoever pays them most, Pakistani politicians and generals will be on their side. That's how India has been able to keep Kashmir for 70 years.

- PRTP GWD

Stop talking about your mama and equating her with Pakistan. Heard she is dirt cheap.

 

[El Sidd]

Has any political party reacted on it yet?

any notion in the parliament? social media support is overwhelmingly pro Iran from Pakistan

 

[313ghazi]

Are you suggesting we should be neutral to a enemy like Iran. Have you forgotten -

• Iran attacked Pakistan border towns in balochistan
• Ira bombed Pakistan border towns
• Iran worked with India, Israel and USA to send spies to Pakistan
• Iran supports terrorism in Pakistan

We need to join Israel, Saudia and US to destroy this Shia nest ...

In my mind, better the devil you know. Iran has negative intentions towards us, but not the capability to really do much about it. It's also actively engaged in Iraq, Syria and Yemen - whilst being threatened by the USA and Israel. Meanwhile we're successfully dismantling terror networks, fencing the border with Iran and Afghanistan, racing ahead with Gwadar and other CPEC projects, raising additional security for the project and looking to take off economically.

Why would we risk that for a conflict? We know for a fact the Americans aren't able to do regime change. They've not managed it in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan or Libya - in each intervention they've created chaos and then abandoned everything other than oil fields. In each country they intervened in the countries are controlled by people who hate the Americans.

If we end up with that scenario on our border with Iran, we risk the success of CPEC, we risk another TTP like insurgency (through some shia elements who are more loyal to the Ayatollah than to our state), we provide India and America an opportunity to fund more violence inside Pakistan (The Indians will do it to weaken us, the Americans will do it to create a roadblock to OBOR).

F--k both sides, let them bomb the shit out of each other, let both of them go home claiming to be champions. As long as it's limited and doesn't create a load of chaos, it shouldn't bother us. It's the people of Iran I feel sorry for. They might be arrogant gits (never met a Persian who wasn't) but they're an intelligent people and are hamstrung by the hatred of America and the Ayatollah. Iran would have been a first world country by now had it not been for sanctions and Mullahs.

 

[Indus Pakistan]

In my mind, better the devil you know. Iran has negative intentions towards us, but not the capability to really do much about it. It's also actively engaged in Iraq, Syria and Yemen - whilst being threatened by the USA and Israel. Meanwhile we're successfully dismantling terror networks, fencing the border with Iran and Afghanistan, racing ahead with Gwadar and other CPEC projects, raising additional security for the project and looking to take off economically.

Why would we risk that for a conflict? We know for a fact the Americans aren't able to do regime change. They've not managed it in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan or Libya - in each intervention they've created chaos and then abandoned everything other than oil fields. In each country they intervened in the countries are controlled by people who hate the Americans.

If we end up with that scenario on our border with Iran, we risk the success of CPEC, we risk another TTP like insurgency (through some shia elements who are more loyal to the Ayatollah than to our state), we provide India and America an opportunity to fund more violence inside Pakistan (The Indians will do it to weaken us, the Americans will do it to create a roadblock to OBOR).

F--k both sides, let them bomb the shit out of each other, let both of them go home claiming to be champions. As long as it's limited and doesn't create a load of chaos, it shouldn't bother us. It's the people of Iran I feel sorry for. They might be arrogant gits (never met a Persian who wasn't) but they're an intelligent people and are hamstrung by the hatred of America and the Ayatollah. Iran would have been a first world country by now had it not been for sanctions and Mullahs.

Impressive post. If it was up to me I would make you a TT.