Awesome
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2006
- Messages
- 22,023
- Reaction score
- 5
1. It's not been demonstrated anywhere by any competent authority that Pakistan lacks credibility to nab OBL - provided credibility means the intent to nab him. Its not been proven. He was not the authority to make that judgement and even if he still tries to make that judgement the court has to agree with his arguments - provided that not a single entity in the entire world has been able to prove complicity of any Pak institution, your first argument falls flat.This conviction did that, certainly. However, Pakistan is wrong as far as law goes. A defense lawyer can argue that Pakistan's gov't demonstrably lacked the credibility to root out OBL and because of that under international law Pakistani sovereignty was nulled so Pakistani courts lack jurisdiction to pursue a treason trial against the doctor for approaching a foreign organization with the purpose and effect of furthering Pakistani compliance with international law.
2. Sovereignty in Abottabad is well established to the point where the SSG team was able to overpower the CIA team guarding OBL's premises while the operation was going on. If we can respond to a CIA/Navy Seal attack within minutes, we had full competence to undertake this operation on our own against OBL.
3. International law states you may not interfere with another country's own lawful authorities. He did that. Vigilanteism is a crime in all countries for this express purpose. Why don't the navy seals come and attack pick-pockets and jay-walkers?
He did nothing to compromise Pakistani security - just the security of people's jobs in the Pakistani establishment. Was there ever any proof that the vaccines he administered were fake? No? Then the damage to "people's trust" can be traced back to the entities originating and propagating the rumor, not the doctor, yes?
The damage was in working with the CIA, people can't trust vaccination drives done by NGOs since who knows which one is working for CIA now. There are certain lines you never cross, CIA and Afridi did it.
A competent court has sentenced him after a trial according to the existing Constitution of Pakistan.Since when is conviction by majority of public opinion justice?