What's new

Pakistani and Bangladeshi migrants having big families to claim benefits

Status
Not open for further replies.
In which other area do you think Indian community could be vulnerable in comparison to Pakistani community?

One favorite bugaboo of anti-immigrant bigots is 'cultural assimilation', specifically outward appearance. But Sikhs keep beards, and wear turbans and kirpas. Hindus proudly display the red dot on the forehead. Most south Asians of all nationalities wear saris in public.

This is precisely what the author wanted to convey, ignore the breeding mentality. The attitude to live on welfare payments beyond their means is what the intent is. Instead people forget the message, and blow a hole into the messenger.

You do realize that the current debt crisis in Europe is because Europeans -- that's white Europeans in Greece, Portugal, Italy, Ireland and Spain -- have been living well beyond their means?
 
.
This "they are not integrating!" BS is ridiculous sometimes.

It is entirely political, and always changes targets over time. From the Irish to the Blacks, to the Jews and the Asians, and now in the post-9/11 era... it seems to have latched on to the Muslims.

I have Chinese family members who live in the West, and when I visited them there... we went to nothing but Chinese restaurants, and met only other Chinese people. Heck, I talk to more Westerners here in HK than I did over there.

Which just goes to show that this "they are not integrating!" BS... is more about political opportunism rather than anything else.
 
.
Question: Was she ever a citizen of Independent India (post 1947). ??

or is it that anyone who says anything bad about Pakistan automatically gets an Indian tag.. C'mon man, we are already 1.2 billion here.. with your logic and the image Pakistan has in the world, soon more than half the population of the world will get labeled as Indian

She is not an average Indian. Her family was politically active and on Indira Gandhi's invite list. She herself is a politician. It tells us what kind of political prejudice she was surrounded by while growing up.
 
.
You do realize that the current debt crisis in Europe is because Europeans -- that's white Europeans in Greece, Portugal, Italy, Ireland and Spain -- have been living well beyond their means?
Now where did PIIGS come into play here ? When the article talks about Pakistani breeding and living on welfare that runs au contraire to the British system, where does digressing help your argument ?
 
.
Now where did PIIGS come into play here ? When the article talks about Pakistani breeding and living on welfare that runs au contraire to the British system, where does digressing help your argument ?

I was responding to your statement: "The attitude to live on welfare payments beyond their means is what the intent is."

I am saying that, if that is your concerns, there are far bigger fish to fry.

Look, I am not disputing her claims in the sense that it is plausible that Pakistani/Bangladeshi migrants have more children than the average white Brit. Many immigrants from poorer countries follow that pattern -- especially the less educated, blue collar migrants.

My only comment is why she chose to throw fuel on the fire? Why did she pick this issue which specifically singles out Pakistanis and Bangladeshis? In that sense, her political upbringing becomes interesting and makes you wonder if there is a political angle to her actions.
 
.
Lumping us with Pakistanis is unfair. They breed like rats there, don't work and have an attitude of entitlement. On the other hand we are hardworking, don't have an axe to grind and actually try to build a better society. Typical arrogance on the part of the media to lump Pakistani's and Bangladeshi's.

:lol: Bangladeshis are worse.

uucm9.jpg


http://iussp2009.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=93139
 
.
I was responding to your statement: "The attitude to live on welfare payments beyond their means is what the intent is."

I am saying that, if that is your concerns, there are far bigger fish to fry.

Look, I am not disputing her claims in the sense that it is plausible that Pakistani/Bangladeshi migrants have more children than the average white Brit. Many immigrants from poorer countries follow that pattern -- especially the less educated, blue collar migrants.

My only comment is why she chose to throw fuel on the fire? Why did she pick this issue which specifically singles out Pakistanis and Bangladeshis? In that sense, her political upbringing becomes interesting and makes you wonder if there is a political angle to her actions.
The concern here is the attitude of Pakistanis and Bangladeshis to breed simply to obtain extra welfare benefits. Behind the smoke and the mirrors of PIIGS and her Indian affiliation, this is the key point highlighted by the article. What is your opinion on the same ?
 
. . .
Developereo, CS. How does it matter what author's inclinations were? Can you refute the claim based on facts? Obviously you cannot. On average, Pakistani and Bangladeshi have more children than any other South Asian countrymen. Indians are the second richest community in UK immediately after whites and they are even better educated than whites also.
 
.
many british teen age girls do the same...have baby at very young age like at 15 year old so that they can live on benifits......at age 30 they are grand mothers and at 50 they are greaat grand mothers....
south asians may be having too many babies per couple...but white brits arent far behind..at two kids per generation...at age 40 a brit couple has an average of 4 off springs.....sometimes more...
asians have stable familiea with far lesser divorce rates so the children although on benifits still cost less than the children of broken up families which is very commn in whites.
 
.
Developereo, CS. How does it matter what author's inclinations were? Can you refute the claim based on facts? Obviously you cannot. On average, Pakistani and Bangladeshi have more children than any other South Asian countries. Indians are the second richest community in UK immediately after whites and they are even better educated than whites too.

I already said that low income, less educated migrants tend to have more children. The questions would be more meaningful if fertility rates for all migrants were viewed, including Carribean, African and Eastern European migrants.

The disturbing part in her statement is the needless comparison to Indian communities. What was the need for that? This in addition to the Sikh guy who now heads the EDL. Unfortunate trends...
 
.
I already said that low income, less educated migrants tend to have more children. The questions would be more meaningful if fertility rates for all migrants were viewed, including Carribean, African and Eastern European migrants.

Every other group has lower fertility rate than Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. Its not about Muslims. Even Indian muslim migrants in UK have lower birth than Pakistani and Bangladeshis.
 
.
Every other group has lower fertility rate than Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. Its not about Muslims. Even Indian muslim migrants in UK have lower birth than Pakistani and Bangladeshis.

And your evidence is....?

Note, it is not important to show that Pakistanis have more children than Indians or white Brits. What's the date for Jamaicans? Romanians? Poles? Zimbabweans?
 
.
And your evidence is....?

Note, it is not important to show that Pakistanis have more children than Indians or white Brits. What's the date for Jamaicans? Romanians? Poles? Zimbabweans?

2j0o19h.jpg


From the link in post #36

Even Carribeans and Africans have lower fertility rate. Once again from the same paper.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom