Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ab ye kya chiz hai?Ku 30 MKI
Ab ye kya chiz hai?
to me its the ground launch variant of CM-400 which itself was a derivative of SY-400Seems to be based on the M20 or the B-611 series.
to me its the ground launch variant of CM-400 which itself was a derivative of SY-400
View attachment 513039
obviously size will be different due to range and launch mechanism and I don't know what you mean to say by different shape of both missile, if you are pointing to the lack of extra fins on the CM-401 as compare to CM-400AKG then i think that too because of difference of launch mechanism and different flight profile; one is ballistic missile other is air launched.Shape & size of the missile look quite different from that of the CM-400AKG.
obviously size will be different due to range and launch mechanism and I don't know what you mean to say by different shape of both missile, if you are pointing to the lack of extra fins on the CM-401 as compare to CM-400AKG then i think that too because of difference of launch mechanism and different flight profile; one is ballistic missile other is air launched.
Pakistan doesn't understand that it is not man behind machine which wins the war. It is men (leaders) behind man who is behind machine. Pakistan might have great warriors alas they dont have leaders. 70 yrs of their history is replete of this hard fact. Most of the times Pakistan indulges in self inflicting adventures due to unrealistic machismo. Hope they still don't believe in 10 Indians = 1 Pakistani.
For each S400 Pakistan needs 72 missiles, for 5 such systems they need 360 missiles. For training and back up purpose another 40. In total they can by 400 missiles. What would be cost of 400 missiles? Now India needs to plan alternatives, Pakistan is forcing India into arms race.
You've only considered the S-400. Barak 8 is also capable of stopping Brahmos. And both IAF and IA have the Barak 8.
Areas that are not protected by the S-400 will be protected by the Barak 8, and IAF will have 2 batteries of it in such regions. That's 64 missiles. The IA will have 8 batteries in just 1 sector, that's 256 missiles.
Any Pakistani missile has to fly over at least one of the army's Barak 8 batteries, followed by 2 of IAF's batteries and then hit the S-400. That's a lot of missiles to defeat.
And then you can consider Akash NG and the XRSAM also.
There is no arms race.
India have many type of SPaM systems which make its air defense very capable, but with advance EW capabilities alongwith long range ARMs, PGMs, Rockets, ALCMs, SLCM, LBCMs, SRBMs, UAVs, UCAVs it can be handled in NCW environment.
Pakistani will say "mere paasa Nasr hai"To put things in perspective, in 1991 the US alone flew over 2300 sorties in SEAD missions, and fired over 1000 HARMs during this time.
India's air defence will be much bigger and sophisticated within the next few years.
So the question you should be asking is how much resources you will be forced to use up just defeating our SAMs, and how many losses would be considered acceptable doing this before you can actually start fighting the war. Of course, you should consider how much damage the IAF has already done in Pakistan during this time.
To put things in perspective, in 1991 the US alone flew over 2300 sorties in SEAD missions, and fired over 1000 HARMs during this time.
India's air defence will be much bigger and sophisticated within the next few years.
So the question you should be asking is how much resources you will be forced to use up just defeating our SAMs, and how many losses would be considered acceptable doing this before you can actually start fighting the war. Of course, you should consider how much damage the IAF has already done in Pakistan during this time.
US performed DEAD not SEAD there is a difference between them, also Pakistan did not have to cover whole India for any future conventional conflict.
Can't defeat SAMs when the ARM is intercepted.