Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But that's a Korean T-50 !??
New Recruit
The spinal design is focused on giving the rear seat a better view while also allowing some room below it for fuel and avionics (I presume) .Masha Allah. Alhamdolillah
Points to be noted:
1.The upper 'spine' is thicker so as to flow more smoothly from the thicker end of the canopy. Sensible aerodynamic design.
2. The LERX look shorter... but the angle is too bad to really tell. I could be wrong on this one. But from initial looks it looks the shorter LERX terminate on a wing that has more surface area. I can see how they achieved lower wing loading. Would be nice to see the frontal/sideways views.
3. Again, bad viewing angle, but the LERX in JF-17 A Block 1/2 were positioned on the middle of the air intake. Here, they seem to be at the very top of the inlet... but again I could be wrong here. Need a better picture.
4. I don't know if I am seeing my fantasies come true in the picture, but this looks like a low wing configuration, meaning instability in the roll axis. If true, it will increase the maneuverability.
5. The bump of the inlet on top of the wings seems somehow broader and shorter? It could signify increased fuel capacity, or in general, increased internal volume. My eyes aren't very good at catching subtle differences I am afraid.
6. Overall, the design seems reminiscent of FA-18... shorter, and more curved in the middle.
7. The tail, as promised, is slightly taller. The parachute tube doesn't seem to extend as much. Could it signify a smaller cute, meaning a shorter landing distance as well?
I need another pair of eyes to reconfirm what I have said above.
@MarvellousThunder@PDC @Oscar @Windjammer @Bilal Khan 777 @The SC
We should wait for different shots from different angles before making any remarks, the obvious on this pic is the spine change and the 2 seats canopy..Masha Allah. Alhamdolillah
Points to be noted:
1.The upper 'spine' is thicker so as to flow more smoothly from the thicker end of the canopy. Sensible aerodynamic design.
2. The LERX look shorter... but the angle is too bad to really tell. I could be wrong on this one. But from initial looks it looks the shorter LERX terminate on a wing that has more surface area. I can see how they achieved lower wing loading. Would be nice to see the frontal/sideways views.
3. Again, bad viewing angle, but the LERX in JF-17 A Block 1/2 were positioned on the middle of the air intake. Here, they seem to be at the very top of the inlet... but again I could be wrong here. Need a better picture.
4. I don't know if I am seeing my fantasies come true in the picture, but this looks like a low wing configuration, meaning instability in the roll axis. If true, it will increase the maneuverability.
5. The bump of the inlet on top of the wings seems somehow broader and shorter? It could signify increased fuel capacity, or in general, increased internal volume. My eyes aren't very good at catching subtle differences I am afraid.
6. Overall, the design seems reminiscent of FA-18... shorter, and more curved in the middle.
7. The tail, as promised, is slightly taller. The parachute tube doesn't seem to extend as much. Could it signify a smaller cute, meaning a shorter landing distance as well?
I need another pair of eyes to reconfirm what I have said above.
@MarvellousThunder@PDC @Oscar @Windjammer @Bilal Khan 777 @The SC
The spinal design is focused on giving the rear seat a better view while also allowing some room below it for fuel and avionics.
Brother Thank you Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much , for the picture
@Quwa @HRK @araz @Bilal Khan 777 @Basel finally the first look of JF-17B
IS it just me or the Spine of the plane looks more like MiG ?
New Recruit
Its sameLooking at the engine. Dosent it look a bit different. Or its the one in block 1 and 2