What's new

Pakistan will get 34 T37 from Turkey.

Status
Not open for further replies.
:rofl:

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

all the pak arsenal in their military is given by baap of all u.s.:haha:



.
You better play call of duty or even much more better, watch pogo... defence talk is not your cup of tea.
Here is an example to open the eyes of a delusional retard like you...

"The State Department has approved Pakistan’s request to buy almost $1 billion in U.S.-made attack helicopters, missiles and other equipment aimed at fighting insurgents in the country’s mountainous north and west regions."

@Horus take out that imbecile.
 
.
It will be the T-37s n hopefully all 65 of them. As PAF is using it for attacks; I'm sure!
 
. .
Two squardens, double engine, advanced super sonic trainner and free. Thank you Turkey.

Turks, Iran.. China. As Nimat Allah shah wali predicted, will be our allies in the battle against India called Ghazwa-E-Hind. Surprise surprise Arabs were never mentioned as our allies.
Hahahaha! Ghazwa-e-Hind! :D Okay we're waiting for you and Zaid Hamid on your horses!
 
. . . . . . .
Great strategy.. Couple of queries : Aircraft carriers carry fighter aircrafts, right..? In case of Indian carriers, Mig-29Ks.. Will they allow F-5s to come close enough ? Also a carrier group has some destroyers/ frigates as well. In Indian case they will be armed with Barak-8/Barak-1 combo.. Can F-5 evade this protection layer..?

Whether many F-5's or even a dozen or 2 dozen ASM's can evade a carrier group like India's. Reality of the fact is, unless you possess a complete air dominance package like the USN does (in combination with the USAF), i.e. attack the enemy from way far or from closer ally airfields and keep the USN ships away, navies of other countries are their weakest links.

Each ship costs hundreds of millions to build and only have like 12, 24 or 36 SAM missiles for simultaneous protection during one attack. Combined ASM's with high tech AESA based jamming (where different beams designed to work as many Microwaves working on different frequencies to fry up your Radar's seeker and its main board, or cause loss of service, the ship doesn't have a whole lot of other defense left. A fighter jet still has some chance to leave the fight or speed up and run away before a lock on is obtained, ships move slowly so they are hard to defend if your SAM systems or radars are overwhelmed and you are not the USN, which means you could have many systems working together to defend you.

In India's case, she'll have to park her critical assets about 600+ KM's away as Pakistan's extended EEZ is now around 350-400 KM and from that edge, for the next two hundred miles, the Indian ships (specially the AC), will be in range of Pakistan's ASM's. But the issue is, being 600+ KM out, it will negate the purpose of any blockade, will allow plenty of time for the Pakistani's to prepare to defend (EW), and will limit India's naval aircraft's capability to loiter for longer times or go deeper inside Pakistan.

No Thats Pakistani Actress Ayeza. :)

I guess I need to find me some career in the local film industry there. She's good looking.
 
Last edited:
.
W

I guess I need to find me some career in the local film industry there. She's good looking.

Too late, she is married now :hitwall:. but you can still take your number and stand in line for many other like her, or even better :raise:.
 
. .
So our K-8 is obsolete..?

Bhai jan this is for LIFT (Lead In Fighter Trainer) and K-8 is a BJT(Basic Jet Trainer) - AJT(Advance Jet Trainer) roll aircraft can be used for LIFT but its better to have a specialised machine that is why we were looking towards Russian Yak-130 and L15.
 
.
Why not PAF acquire all the 65+ T-37s they have and also ask the current and former operators for buying more...

I think PAF should also look for T-38/F-5 Trainers from GCC-Middle East like KSA-Jordan I am sure about 80 of those can make a difference.

T-38/F-5 Trainers with upgrades can be more beneficial than any other plane PAF can get as they can be free of cost for PAF.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom