Maarkhoor
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2015
- Messages
- 17,051
- Reaction score
- 36
- Country
- Location
A building or two.How much area can a missile destroy with non nuclear bomb
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A building or two.How much area can a missile destroy with non nuclear bomb
Quite wrong .
Are you talking about Land attack cruise missile or anti ship missiles, basically anti ship missiles are supersonic developed by Russia and china and very few Land attack cruise missiles are supersonicAbi tests kar hi rahe ho tu aik supersonic cruise missile b test kar lo
It would be something Akin to the new Lockheed PrSM Missile; able to strike key parts of SAM batteries, troop fortifications, armored convoys and eventually ships at sea.A building or two.
Most of them hypersonic at terminal stagesAll ballistic missiles are supersonic. There's no such thing as a subsonic ballistic missile.
You mean SUPERSONIC ANTI SHIP MISSILES OR LAND ATTACK CRUISE MISSILES, MOST OF SUPERSONIC ANTI SHIP MISSILES DEVELOPED BY CHINA AND RUSSIA, WHEREAS MOST OF LAND ATTACK CRUISE MISSILES ARE SUBSONICNot all ballistic missiles are supersonic.some can be hypersonic as well.
I am talking about cruise missile
Supersonic Cruise missile buddy
BothYou mean SUPERSONIC ANTI SHIP MISSILES OR LAND ATTACK CRUISE MISSILES
No need for Land attack cruise missiles to be supersonic if they will have this capability they'll be detect ànd track easily and then easily be intercepted because of Big IR (INFRARED) ànd RCS (RADAR CROSS SECTION)Both
Speed is the key here my friend.Supersonic cruise missiles are not detected too early as you think.A small manuere can betray the intercepter missile and enemy will not have the time to launch second intercepter missile.No need for Land attack cruise missiles to be supersonic if they will have this capability they'll be detect ànd track easily and then easily be intercepted because of Big IR (INFRARED) ànd RCS (RADAR CROSS SECTION)
Of course they are detected early.Speed is the key here my friend.Supersonic cruise missiles are not detected too early as you think.A small manuere can betray the intercepter missile and enemy will not have the time to launch second intercepter missile.
While sub sonic missile once detected, it's gone.
You are ignoring manuering characteristics of cruise missiles.Speed along with manuerability is the top priority while developing supersonic cruise missiles.Of course they are detected early.
The thing has to fly at significant altitude to sustain a supersonic flight.
That increases its visibility to radars.
No My friend you're wrong supersonic ones are not true kind of cruise missiles they can cruise tens of meters instead of few meters like their subsonic counterparts ànd don't have a true terrain following/ hugging capability,Speed is the key here my friend.Supersonic cruise missiles are not detected too early as you think.A small manuere can betray the intercepter missile and enemy will not have the time to launch second intercepter missile.
While sub sonic missile once detected, it's gone.
I can be wrong in my assessment but variety should be maintained in our cruise missile arsenal .No My friend you're wrong supersonic ones are not true kind of cruise missiles they can cruise tens of meters instead of few meters like their subsonic counterparts ànd don't have a true terrain following/ hugging capability,
For example take a look at Indian- Russian brahmouse which is supersonic anti ship missiles brahmouse cruises 10-30 (32-100 feet) meter above the oceans whereas subsonic Harpoon can cruise 4-5 meter (16- 20 feet) above the oceans hence less chance to get detection by enemy sensors
USN IS WORRIED ABOUT HYBRID ANTI SHIP MISSILES THAT HAVE BOTH QUALITIES ( SUBSONIC CRUISE) LOW DETECTION ÀND TERMINAL SUPERSONIC DASH ( LESS REACTION TIMES) LIKE RUSSIAN SIZZLERS BUT FOR ALL SUPERSONIC ANTI SHIP MISSILES THEY HAVE RAM (ROLLING AIRFRAME MISSILES) ESSM (EVOLVE SEA SPARROW MISSILES) ÀND CIWS ( CLOSE IN WEAPON SYSTEM) AT THEIR ALL SHIPS
SO YOU ARE WRONG BROTHER
We are long way to develop hypersonic missile, we yet to have ramjet/scramjet engine tech ànd stick to the topic brother this thread is for s1 testI can be wrong in my assessment but variety should be maintained in our cruise missile arsenal .
Supersonic missile development can pave our way for hypersonic Missiles which is real game changer for us.
When will they remove these fins from missiles?
Our latest missile design Ababeel is also with fins
Bro no new upgrades only they are making room for Indian Indian pilots to take pampers with themYou know India has just Recieved their new Rafale jets but from next month they are going to get some upgrades, military technology is always evolving, missile may appear the same visibly but what it incorporates matters. We need weapons that not just flies over the enemy's head rather the one that strikes into its heart.