What's new

Pakistan Today Is Better Than It Was 20 Years Ago

sparklingway

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
3,878
Reaction score
0
Pakistan Today Is Better Than It Was 20 Years Ago
Farid Ahmad

Sitting in the middle of load-shedding, watching the political theater roll-on ad infinitum, and reading the news of another security incident somewhere, it is easy to be depressed about Pakistan these days.

Depression, however, is parasitic.

It jumps from person to person and grows in strength unless treated. It makes you weak and vulnerable – and sometimes it is necessary to break the circle. Yes, Pakistan is going through very tough times, but there is no reason to throw all hope to the wind and to start denying the things that are going right – and a lot has gone right in the past twenty or so years.

First, the necessary disclaimer: The intention here is not to sweep Pakistan’s problems under the rug or to try and rationalize away the immense suffering of the victims of recent violence and economic turmoil. There is no doubt that things have taken a very serious turn in recent months and millions of people are paying a heavy price every day.

With that disclaimer in place, here’s a collection of things that I have seen change for the better in my life in Pakistan - from high-school in the eighties to today.

It is necessarily a very personal list, though others might be able to relate to some of it. Traveling apart, I’ve spent my life living in Islamabad and Lahore and my memories are naturally specific to these places. So again, I’m fully conscious of the fact that not everyone can relate to or agree with my attempt at optimism.

But even if I come across as being overly optimistic, it is only to counter those who are becoming unnecessarily pessimistic.

Maybe you have your own stories, your own inspirations, your own rays of hope that keep you going… these are mine. And I share them with the hope that they will help someone else break out of the circle of pessimism.

Roads:

1989: Driving from Lahore to Islamabad was an ordeal on the mostly single-lane, badly maintained GT road.

2010: Driving from Lahore to Islamabad is a pleasure on the motorway. And it is not just this one road, a lot of roads have been added to the network or improved. I know people in my office in Islamabad who routinely drive to Karachi with their families. We need many more roads – but we have certainly not been sitting idle.

Communications:

1989: Calling from Islamabad to Lahore meant going to the market to a PCO, telling the guy to book a 3-minute call and waiting around till it got connected. Even if you had an STD line at home, your fingers were likely to get sore from dialing before you got connected. And once the call was connected you watched the clock like a hawk as it was so expensive.

2010: Instant, cheap calls worldwide for everyone from cellular phones.

Internet:

1995: I was first introduced to the wonders of Email in 1995. It was an offline ’store and forward’ system (remember those @sdnpk email addresses?) . If you sent a mail in the morning, it reached in the evening when your Email provider called USA on a direct line to forward it.

2010: Broadband, DSL, WiMax, Dialup, Cable - instant connectivity for everyone. More generally, I’ve gone thru a series of denials about the adoption of new technologies in Pakistan. I went through thinking that cellular phones would never gain widespread adoption - I was wrong; that internet would remain a niche - I was wrong; that broadband would never take off here - I was wrong; that Blackberry would never be adopted - I was wrong. Here I speak from some experience as I work for a cellular company and I’ve seen all these numbers grow exponentially. The fact is that Pakistan and Pakistanis love technology and are eager to adopt and adapt the latest technologies as soon as they become available. With its huge population, this creates a large market for every new technology in Pakistan and businesses rush in to fill it. This bodes well for the future.

Education:
1986: When I finished high school, career choices were limited. You could either be a doctor or an engineer – or you could join the army or the civil service. And once you’d decided to be, say, an engineer, choices were limited to practically one or two government universities in your region. MBA was still a somewhat rare phenomena and there was only one well known business school – IBA in Karachi.

2010: As my kids move towards high school, there are many more choices, and tons of good schools to pick from. LUMS, GIKI, IBA, Bahria University, Air University, NUST (which has grown much bigger since those days) and many more. In a country that gets a beating for its lack of focus on education, we have made tangible progress - even though there is much more to do.

Bookstores:
1986: There were few decent bookstores in Islamabad and Lahore (Feroze Sons in Lahore being an exception of course, and there were the old-book shops in Islamabad). Finding books - even prescribed books for professional education – was hard. I remember many a trip to Anarkali during my UET days looking for the latest edition of that one book that would always be short

2010: Lots of good, large stores well-stocked with books on every imaginable subject. And even Amazon delivers books in Pakistan in case you cannot find them locally – I’ve ordered books from Amazon three times, and Pakistan post has come thru each time – delivering the Amazon books in a large sack on my doorstep. In my observation, this is linked to the last point. Education / reading has grown in importance and there is a greater demand for books than before.

Foreign Currency Regulation:

1992: Paying in dollars for exams like GMAT or GRE involved going to the State Bank and filling out forms – and talking your way around unhelpful clerks

2010: Better regulations, Credit Cards and foreign exchange dealers mean you can make such payments instantly. In general, financial regulations since the early nineties have been more or less consistent. While each successive government likes to blame the last one for all ills - they all end up making similar policies anyway: privatization, deregulation, increasing the tax base, etc. Implementation has been uneven and there have been setbacks, but the general direction has been towards opening up of the markets - which has resulted in many of the other changes listed here.

Banks:

1989: Cashing a cheque from a bank, or paying a bill for that matter, routinely meant long queues, unhelpful clerks, long waits – and this was at the larger banks in big cities.

2010: I hardly ever go to the bank, thanks to ATMs. Bills are payable at more banks than ever and the staff is better trained than before (believe me!). There are several private banks today with a healthy competition that makes them invest in better infrastructure, improved technology, and innovation. Consumer finance products which were largely unknown twenty years ago are everywhere.

Consumer Choice:

1989: There used to be exactly one brand of toothpaste – and other consumer goods offered little variety. People used to ask relatives to bring stuff like shampoos from abroad when they were visiting.

2010: Take a trip to any half decent market and you’re spoiled for choice. Go to a place like a Metro store, or the Hypermart in Lahore and you could practically be anywhere in the world. (Of course some people still like to source their shampoos from abroad but, well I guess old habits die hard!) Again, this is not just a coincidence. Privatization and deregulation have moved things in this direction.

Petrol Pumps:

1984: Smelly, dirty places. Few choices, mostly government owned.

2010: Modern, clean, efficient places. Plenty of choices, corporate sector thriving.

Television / Information:

1984: You had exactly one government run channel. There was no concept of foreign channels. Listening to BBC meant tuning in to their radio service.

2010: Channel, channels, and more channels. Local, foreign, sports, news, kids – take your pick. Hate them or love them – they do inform and do give you more choices.

Cars:

1989: Buying a car meant years of saving and then buying a beat-up second-hand car which would break down more often than not.

2010: More leasing options, more models, more cars on the road. People who have always had cars often treat this proliferation of cars on the road as a negative (“oh the rush on the roads”). But ask the man who buys / leases his first car for his family and takes them out for the first day of entertainment.

Philanthropy:

Well, I guess this is one thing that has not changed over the years. I’ve always held that among Pakistanis you will find the most open-hearted, generous people around - and I still believe this. The philanthropic sector has become more organized over the years. Edhi Trust was the torch bearer and is still doing a great job, but there are countless others. And grassroots philanthropy - now enabled by pervasive communication - is thriving. I registered the full scale of it in the aftermath of the earthquake - and it simply reinforced my belief.

I could go on.

The point is that while there is much that has gone wrong, there is much that has gone right. And we have gotten this far while getting through one political maelstrom after another. Through thick and thin we’ve shown ourselves to be resourceful, resilient, tolerant, and progressive.

While the examples here are personal they didn’t happen by coincidence. We’ve seen a strengthening of our institutions in education, finance, infrastructure, and communications. While there has been no “Grand Design” and no Jinnah or Mahatir to lead us, we’ve managed to muddle through and get a lot of things right anyway.

I’m all for being self critical, and at another time I could write an equally long list of things that have become worse over the years. But we must not be dismissive for the sake of being dismissive. There is much that is good in Pakistan – and it is important to draw strength from our achievements even as we try to correct our mistakes.

PS : @TechLahore : I've found Optimism :cheers::cheers:
 
. . .
yeah i agree with the above article

Pakistan is indeed way better than it was 20 years ago.

Just have a trip from Gujrat to Rawalpindi/Islamabad and you will feel like you are driving in europe.

Wherever we wish to go from Gujrat for example Sargodha's distance has been shortened upto 50-60% in past 2 decades. We used to reach lahore in 2 and half hours to 3 hours before and now we can reach lahore within 2 hours time. We used to travel Rawalpindi in 4-5 years and now you can go to Pindi within 2 and half hours time. I remember back in 2001 i visited Pakistan and the internet speed was too slow. You could not even listen 1 audio song from internet and now you have wireless connections even in small towns of Pakistan. Watch video movies without interruption.

Everything is way better than before
 
.
To some extent I agree with the author above But I think relative comparison with our neighbours is also necessary to gauge our growth. The author mentioned basic ammenities that have seen the same growth more or less in most countries around the world. The Fact of the matter is other than the JF-17 we have nothing to show for past twenty years. We failed to capture our place in the huge outsourcing market, we failed to free our instituions from the clutches of dirty politics and corruption. We failed to deal with our internal problems ignoring them all the way to the end till they threatened to tear apart the ery fabric of this nation. Seeing few schools or roads built up means nothing if you have more unemployed people than you did twenty years ago, more people who cannot make basic ends meet and an economy that has never been in a deeper ditch. Travelling between Islamabad and Lahore it's hard to see the price this country has paid over these twenty years.
 
.
To some extent I agree with the author above But I think relative comparison with our neighbours is also necessary to gauge our growth.

Indeed, the world has improved by and large over the past 20 years. While some countries might have been on the path of retrogression, it is wiser to came your growth with other nations having the same resources, opportunities and basic conditions.

Nonetheless, the article makes you feel good.
 
Last edited:
.
Indeed, the world has improved by and large over the past 20 years. While some countries might have been on the path of retrogression, it is wiser to came your growth with other nations having the same resources, opportunities and basic conditions.

Nonetheless, the article makes you fell good.

He talks about things that are bound to change for every nation over tHe given period of time. Based on these things you can say that we haven't stood still in these twenty years but are we better off that's a question that deserves a realtive answer.. He didn't mention anything in which Pakistan had made 'outstanding' progress, we're still growing at the same pace which is very low relative to the pace we should have grown at
 
.
But when we look at the negative side of the picture it is also very dark. For example

1) The food was not that expensive and the poor person used to get enough food to eat

2) There was no electricity loadshedding for 16-18 hours a day like today

3) The external debts of Pakistan were less than half

4) No bomb blasts, No drone attacks, No America, No IMF Conditions, No kerry-lugar bill

Our soverighty was never on stake

-----------

In fact the food was so cheap that i can remember if some begger used to come to our house my mom or sisters used to give him one Bowl of "Ata/Flour" instead of giving him rupees but now the Flour is so expensive that everybody prefer to give 5-10 rupees to beggers and not one cup of Flour.
 
.
And to those who talk about Punjab and Karachi which have always been the centre of development but what about Balochistan and Khyber ? What has Changed there in 20 years ? What motorways have been built between swat and Peshawar, what has GoP done outside of Quetta ? This is a true shame that when we talk about development we so conviently leave out half of pakistan's land mass, this is coming from a punjabi guy
 
.
to be honest i have got many other reasons to feel how we are better now than 20 yrs back but majority of the reasons mentioned in this article are the effects of globalisation.
 
.
But when we look at the negative side of the picture it is also very dark. For example

1) The food was not that expensive and the poor person used to get enough food to eat

2) There was no electricity loadshedding for 16-18 hours a day like today

3) The external debts of Pakistan were less than half

4) No bomb blasts, No drone attacks, No America, No IMF Conditions, No kerry-lugar bill

Our soverighty was never on stake
.

If most of our 2-anna hack-infested media can't see the difference, it doesn't mean we should don the same blinders. Separating the emotional reaction that one experiences when one sees anything wrong in one's own country, let's be fair here.

To your points above:

1) Poverty in Pakistan has actually been reduced. Much as we keep saying "bhookay mar rahey hein log", this is not the case. Bhookay nahien mar rahey log, lekin haan, mehengai huee hay.

2) Even today, load shedding is basically due to circular debt. This issue can be remedied rather quickly but unfortunately the government is not demonstrating the necessary will. Why? I've heard many theories which I would rather not get into here. Fundamentally, we are not running out of energy... this is a temporary issue which will go away or at least be diminished greatly.

3) The GDP of Pakistan was also one-third of what it is today. Measuring debt as an absolute number is meaningless.

4) Yes, but there was the Zia-Reagan love affair and associated programs. Prior to that there was the Yahya/Nixon nexus and prior to that there was the Ayub-Eisenhower/LBJ situation. If anything, the stance we have taken now based on the increase in Pakistan's relative power over the decades, is much stronger than what we've been able to take in the past. You have a Pakistani foreign minister asking the Americans to "do more", rather than the other way round. We signed the SEATO treaty in the 50s and got completely double-crossed when 1965 came... don't you think we've learned a few lessons over the years? Don't you think we have more leverage now than we did back then? Don't you think we are more self reliant and more capable of defending ourselves than we were back then?

As for bomb blasts, the sub continent's history has been punctuated by violence. Would you rather have these bomb blasts or 2 million people dying in Hindu-Muslim ethnic riots (1947), or dozens of thousands perishing in the violence between Mukti Bahini and Pakistani security forces? The bomb blasts are a consequence of something that was imposed on us from the outside, i.e. the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the dominoes that fell as a consequence of it. The fact that we have emerged from 30 years of super power manipulation as a country with a growing economy, with a strong military and with a grasp of how to arrest and eradicate the terrorist menace, is a great testament to either us, or whoever watches over us.

To put things in perspective, all of the terror we have experienced since 2001 has been less destructive in terms of lives lost, than just one insurgency (Kashmir) afflicting India. And we aren't even bringing the Nagas, Naxals, other Maoists, Islamists, Sikhs etc. into the equation. One has to put things into a regional context to evaluate where we stand. The reason I am giving this example is not to get into an India vs. Pakistan discussion, but to point out that while all these security issues rage on in India, the overall spin the situation is given is far from the headline, "India fragmenting". When much less happens in Pakistan, you get the kind of cover stories the brain dead ba$tards at Newsweek were printing a couple of years ago...
 
.
I
The bomb blasts are a consequence of something that was imposed on us from the outside, i.e. the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the dominoes that fell as a consequence of it. The fact that we have emerged from 30 years of super power manipulation as a country with a growing economy, with a strong military and with a grasp of how to arrest and eradicate the terrorist menace, is a great testament to either us, or whoever watches over us.

As an Indian, I'd rather not comment on Pakistan's current situation vis-a-vis 20 years ago as I am not the most qualified to do so. Even though you have brought India into the mix for the state of comparison I feel you have raised valid points.

What I found worrisome was the above bolded part. For an educated and well traveled guy your comments seem to be falling into the normal mode of "not our fault" and pointing fingers at others rather than self introspection. I don't think you would really like to kid yourself that Pakistan's involvement in Afghanistan against the Soviets in the 80's was imposed on it by outside parties. You seem to underrate Pakistan's own previous interferences in that country and your own desire to be close to the Yanks.
 
.
What I found worrisome was the above bolded part. For an educated and well traveled guy your comments seem to be falling into the normal mode of "not our fault" and pointing fingers at others rather than self introspection. I don't think you would really like to kid yourself that Pakistan's involvement in Afghanistan against the Soviets in the 80's was imposed on it by outside parties. You seem to underrate Pakistan's own previous interferences in that country and your own desire to be close to the Yanks.

Robbie, completely separate and apart from the USSR's exclusive support for India (while most western nations assisted both Pakistan and India), are you aware that Nikita Khruschev publicly threatened that he would nuke Peshawar in 1960?

Are you aware that Zbigniew Brzezenski is on record for saying that the US created a situation in Afghanistan that would pull the Soviets in so that they could set up a "bear trap"?

Are you aware that the Afghan resistance against the Soviets started with sticks, stones and .303 Lee Enfield rifles before Pakistan began its assistance of the Mujahideen?

Are you aware that Pakistan was inundated with 4+M refugees and no international help as a consequence of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan? India used the refugee excuse to launch a war against Pakistan in 1971. Were we not within our rights to at least help Afghans defend their country and so that they could live in peace, rather than seeking refuge in the millions in our country?

Are you aware that Soviet piloted jets used to regularly cross into Pakistan and bomb Afghan refugee camps on Pakistani territory? The PAF shot over 20 such intruding aircraft, including one piloted by Alexander Rutskoy, who later became Vice President of Russia.

Are you aware that most analysts and commentators felt that the Russians would not stop in Afghanistan and would make a push for the Arabian sea?

How were we not pulled into the Afghan quagmire? We had millions of refugees coming in, bombing runs on our border areas by Russian jets, a threatening super power on our western border, encirclement by allies who were both inimical towards us and the threat of invasion. Did we invite the Russians into Afghanistan? Did we ask Brezenski to setup the Bear Trap?

History doesn't support your allegation.
 
.
To some extent I agree with the author above But I think relative comparison with our neighbours is also necessary to gauge our growth.

If you mean comparing us to our neighbour to the east then just forget about it. That neighbour shares no border with war torn Afghanistan while Pakistan shares its 2nd longest border with Afghanistan that has pretty much been an invisible border in most of Pakistan's history.


The truth is whatever happens in Afghanistan affects Pakistan, thats why a stable Afghanistan is in Pakistan's best interest.


However, Pakistan could learn from other countries who are emerging as a global powers like our friend People's Republic of China, Pakistan's closest ally who we can learn a lot from. The People's Republic of China (PRC), was established 2 years after Pakistan and look at where it is now.
 
Last edited:
.
I blame Zia ul Haq with his pointless Sharia campaign.

Thanks a lot for the slow down!

I blame the Dajjal and his secret mini agents.

As an Indian, I'd rather not comment on Pakistan's current situation vis-a-vis 20 years ago as I am not the most qualified to do so. Even though you have brought India into the mix for the state of comparison I feel you have raised valid points.

What I found worrisome was the above bolded part. For an educated and well traveled guy your comments seem to be falling into the normal mode of "not our fault" and pointing fingers at others rather than self introspection. I don't think you would really like to kid yourself that Pakistan's involvement in Afghanistan against the Soviets in the 80's was imposed on it by outside parties. You seem to underrate Pakistan's own previous interferences in that country and your own desire to be close to the Yanks.

There was no internal desire to be close to the Yanks. The whole reason for befriending Yanks was actually to help develop the country. Indians already had an established base built by the British whereas Pakistan had none. Also India greatly borrowed from the Russians and British after independence, Pakistan had to rely upon the Americans. How else would we have developed Pakistan?

When Indians view Pakistan's development, they greatly overlook the major historical fact that Pakistan had no industrial base, no educational base, no technological base to rely upon after independence, whereas India had everything. A couple of high schools and universities in lahore and karachi and that was it.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom