Pakistan to summon Bangladesh’s envoy

[khair_ctg]

it is not about money rather they Pakistan is a nuclear nation plus we still consider Pakistan as Enemy of Bangladesh
so why would they apologies even
first make good relation before they will apologies and we are demonizing 24 7 until now Pakistan even if they apologies things will still remain same

all people who support or supported India's 1971 annexation of East Pakistan should apologize.

How wrong ill-informed and laughable your question is very easily established by your country thanking India and presenting the picture of Pakistan surrendering to India, enabling liberation.

those are Indian agents. actual Bangladeshis grieve at the fact they came under Indian control and their very identity as East Pakistanis changed to 'Bangladeshi' and identity as sovereign majority-Muslims changed to subservience to Hindu-Brahminism.

 

[Saiful Islam]

all people who support or supported India's 1971 annexation of East Pakistan should apologize.


those are Indian agents. actual Bangladeshis grieve at the fact they came under Indian control and their very identity as East Pakistanis changed to 'Bangladeshi' and identity as sovereign majority-Muslims changed to subservience to Hindu-Brahminism.

I asked my auntie who is well into her 70's and she dismissed the whole 1971 debacle and agreed that the separation was a stupid one but advised that we should get out of the clutches off mighty Hind.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

This amounts to gross interference in the internal affairs of the sovereign republic of Bangladesh.

Bangladesh was formed due to your interference in the affairs of a sovereign state..,
Your interference and dirty .... can be viewed in Maldives,Sri Lanka,supportin proxies in Pakistan an nowadays in Nepal.

 

[khair_ctg]

I asked my auntie who is well into her 70's and she dismissed the whole 1971 debacle and agreed that the separation was a stupid one but advised that we should get out of the clutches off mighty Hind.

a separation based on mutual will between East and West Pakistan is one thing. this was annexation of one by India.

to be practical, people of East Bengal (particularly Muslims) by subcontinental standards were very backward by the year they got independence in 1947, after a long period of British discrimination and Hindu domination. the Hindus of Bengal, on the other hand, during the same time were a different class in lots of ways. no wonder Hindus dominated East Pakistan and eventually turned it into their own country. people of my parents' generation during 50s and 60s were oblivious and super naive. there was no shortage of leftist rallies they attended as Pakistani students. and they admit how naive and wrong they were. naivete and ignorance is still there in them i observe.

 

[livingdead]

a separation based on mutual will between East and West Pakistan is one thing. this was annexation of one by India.

to be practical, people of East Bengal (particularly Muslims) by subcontinental standards were very backward by the year they got independence in 1947, after a long period of British discrimination and Hindu domination. the Hindus of Bengal, on the other hand, during the same time were a different class in lots of ways. no wonder Hindus dominated East Pakistan and eventually turned it into their own country. people of my parents' generation during 50s and 60s were oblivious and super naive. there was no shortage of leftist rallies they attended as Pakistani students. and they admit how naive and wrong they were. naivete and ignorance is still there in them i observe.

I agree about hindu domination which actually gave rise to call for independent muslim homeland. However how can you call the same people naive who faught to separate from hindus to form east pakistan? are you saying they are so stupid that the people they were killing few decades before suddenly became friends?
The fact is, after independence east pakistan did not feel they were taken care of, and simply exchanged subservience to upper class hindus with subservience to punjabi muslims.
Hypothetically speaking if there is a call of united pakistan again, will you support it?

 

[Post Colonnial]

those are Indian agents. actual Bangladeshis grieve at the fact they came under Indian control and their very identity as East Pakistanis changed to 'Bangladeshi' and identity as sovereign majority-Muslims changed to subservience to Hindu-Brahminism.

Actual Bangladeshis actually are the ones who rejected Pakistan due to the horrendous treatment they suffered under the bigoted Islamabad regime; and are appreciative of the Indian help in defeating the Pakistani army's wanton genocide.

 

[khair_ctg]

Actual Bangladeshis actually are the ones who rejected Pakistan due to the horrendous treatment they suffered under the bigoted Islamabad regime; and are appreciative of the Indian help in defeating the Pakistani army's wanton genocide.

if your definition of "actual Bangladeshis" is Indian paid agents, then you are right. they are appreciative that India provided help to carry out genocide on patriotic East Pakistanis and turn East Pakistan into a semi autonomous Indian colony.

 

[khair_ctg]

I asked my auntie who is well into her 70's and she dismissed the whole 1971 debacle and agreed that the separation was a stupid one but advised that we should get out of the clutches off mighty Hind.

after independence east pakistan did not feel they were taken care of, and simply exchanged subservience to upper class hindus with subservience to punjabi muslims.

good point. this is the exact line Hindus were trying to sell to East Pakistan Muslims all along. motive: to bring East Pakistanis back into Hindu domination. Awami League played on ethno-centrism. motive: to create political momentum/get votes and for the extremist elements, to de-Muslimize and spread communism in the entity called East Pakistan.

this is why the marriage between Indian aggression and extreme East Pakistani leftists took place.

West Pakistanis could have been real life werewolves. but that does not mean East Pakistanis should have invited India to colonize them. and East Pakistani masses overwhelmingly did not.

the "naive" Muslim masses could be easily manipulated and subdued. and anti-East Pakistan forces learned this well. it is that naivete that helped AL with Hindus to drum up anti-Muslim sentiments (finely wrapped in talks of emancipation against West Pakistanis). it helped AL and other leftist thugs to control the streets around 1970 and coerce people to at least be indifferent if not be supportive towards the ensuing Indian takeover in the form of Bangladesh.

even today India is trying to take advantage of subdued Bangladeshi people. India is committing or aiding in heinous crimes to try to defend the legitimacy of its 1971 takeover of this land.

Hypothetically speaking if there is a call of united pakistan again, will you support it?

if that is only what will free Bangladesh from Indian clutches and give Bangladesh back the sovereignty it lost in 1971, YES.

the ultimate concern is that Bangladeshis retain their sovereign identity they had as East Pakistanis. and there is nothing hypothetical about this right.

this applies if acknowledging the existence of Bangladesh as separate from India. if it's about Bangladesh officially being part of Bengal state of India and part of India altogether, that is a different issue.

 

[bongbang]

I asked my auntie who is well into her 70's and she dismissed the whole 1971 debacle and agreed that the separation was a stupid one but advised that we should get out of the clutches off mighty Hind.

Wow your auntie

 

[livingdead]

good point. this is the exact line Hindus were trying to sell to East Pakistan Muslims all along. motive: to bring East Pakistanis back into Hindu domination. Awami League played on ethno-centrism. motive: to create political momentum/get votes and for the extremist elements, to de-Muslimize and spread communism in the entity called East Pakistan.

this is why the marriage between Indian aggression and extreme East Pakistani leftists took place.

West Pakistanis could have been real life werewolves. but that does not mean East Pakistanis should have invited India to colonize them. and East Pakistani masses overwhelmingly did not.

the "naive" Muslim masses could be easily manipulated and subdued. and anti-East Pakistan forces learned this well. it is that naivete that helped AL with Hindus to drum up anti-Muslim sentiments (finely wrapped in talks of emancipation against West Pakistanis). it helped AL and other leftist thugs to control the streets around 1970 and coerce people to at least be indifferent if not be supportive towards the ensuing Indian takeover in the form of Bangladesh.

even today India is trying to take advantage of subdued Bangladeshi people. India is committing or aiding in heinous crimes to try to defend the legitimacy of its 1971 takeover of this land.

if that is only what will free Bangladesh from Indian clutches and give Bangladesh back the sovereignty it lost in 1971, YES.

the ultimate concern is that Bangladeshis retain their sovereign identity they had as East Pakistanis. and there is nothing hypothetical about this right.

this applies if acknowledging the existence of Bangladesh as separate from India. if it's about Bangladesh officially being part of Bengal state of India and part of India altogether, that is a different issue.

It is debatable whether there was an evil plan or situation just unfolded as it is after independence. I would say its later, punjabis are still dismissive about bengalis, and if you watch the leaders of west pakistanis(old video footage) they were same.

What you are saying is, because bangladesh is heavily influenced by India now, everything was ok back then. Thats simply not true, you cant fool millions of muslims in bd, they are not all stupid. The overwhelming support was for self-determination(if not independence) and pak govt action just made it easier. Instead of trying to win bengalis by doing political deal with their leaders, they tried strong arm tactics. I am sorry you ended up being on losing side, and India takes some of the blame but not all.

 

[Super Falcon]

First of all what stupid courts in BD when in 71 bd was not how you punish those who were supporting their own country pakistan


Hasina fear from the DAY GREAT ALLAH starts its wrath on u u wont get any place in world to hide nor in space better stop mass killings os fellow muslims

 

[Saiful Islam]

Wow your auntie

You think those memes are meant to be funny or something? Sort your life out please.

 

[bongbang]

You think those memes are meant to be funny or something? Sort your life out please.

Saiful baba asking his auntie in matrix

 

[Umair Nawaz]

Truth abt what had happened in 1971.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10153492958227663

 

[khair_ctg]

It is debatable whether there was an evil plan or situation just unfolded as it is after independence. I would say its later, punjabis are still dismissive about bengalis, and if you watch the leaders of west pakistanis(old video footage) they were same.

What you are saying is, because bangladesh is heavily influenced by India now, everything was ok back then. Thats simply not true, you cant fool millions of muslims in bd, they are not all stupid. The overwhelming support was for self-determination(if not independence) and pak govt action just made it easier. Instead of trying to win bengalis by doing political deal with their leaders, they tried strong arm tactics. I am sorry you ended up being on losing side, and India takes some of the blame but not all.

no i don't think everything was okay before 1971. what i'm saying is it could have been even worse than it actually was, and it would still not justify the Indian takeover of East Pakistan and India installing a loyal regime and system oppressing the people of that land.

things like anti-Urdu movements and other aggressive political operations to dismember the very culture from the Muslim people were clinically conducted.