What's new

Pakistan to soon deploy a nasty surprise for Indian Aircraft Carriers.

.
Just regional:lol: and long way to come:enjoy:, China is building global like GPS and Golnass navigation system kid, and its for guiding Pakistani and Chinese missiles to precision:p:
India's can be expanded to a global network at a later date no problem, a regional navigation system is more than 99% of countries have.....

Relying on others for such critical functions, says it all.

+ still haven't answered how you will target an Indian ship at sea and then keep track of it for your missile to hit?
 
.
+ still haven't answered how you will target an Indian ship at sea and then keep track of it for your missile to hit?
i already give you answer you brain fart:hitwall::devil: we have no DF-21 and DF-26 like missile we have coastal radars batteries and AWACS for you invincible and invisible to track CBG supersonic, hyper-sonic and subsonic anti ship cruise missile for your invisible CBG:enjoy:
 
.
pakistan is far superior in missile technology.it doesn't matter what indians say.we are on the right path and with different missiles,specially anti ship missile,we can defend our coastline and keep track of large fleet of indian navy.
 
.
It seems certain Indians are much stressed only hearing such news; imagine what will happened to them, when we will test such system?
 
. . .
Pak already working with China on land based stations for Beidu which may in near future be used after sufficient land based facilities to guide long range ASBMS of Pakistan if developed and deployed in future.
 
.
aircraft carrier will have no role in war against Pakistan, infact it will be a liability
ACC rule is to project global power
the very reason why china never built them until it was in a position to project global power

no matter how strong defence you have in ACC it can be saturated by nation of size of pakistan, ACC ar good against countries with no airforces
 
.
aircraft carrier will have no role in war against Pakistan, infact it will be a liability
ACC rule is to project global power
the very reason why china never built them until it was in a position to project global power

no matter how strong defence you have in ACC it can be saturated by nation of size of pakistan, ACC ar good against countries with no airforces
Agreed partially but unfortunately right now we done have any saturation attack capable weapon ... cm400akg induction is not confirmed ... submarine attack is very risky for the submarine itself however will be an option after we get our chineses subs ...

We desperately need to work on anti.ship ballistic missile and induction of cm400akg in large number ... and indtegration of same with assets like p3c orion for a saturation attack as thnder can carry only limited number if cm400akg
 
.
aircraft carrier will have no role in war against Pakistan, infact it will be a liability
ACC rule is to project global power
the very reason why china never built them until it was in a position to project global power

no matter how strong defence you have in ACC it can be saturated by nation of size of pakistan, ACC ar good against countries with no airforces



Population vs ACC and Airforce vs ACC... Strange argument... CBG won't be stepping close to your boarders.. you need to locate ACC first to utilise your birds.. even in that scenario, your airforce can't afford to diversify it's fleet.. and you don't have naval wing..

i already give you answer you brain fart:hitwall::devil: we have no DF-21 and DF-26 like missile we have coastal radars batteries and AWACS for you invincible and invisible to track CBG supersonic, hyper-sonic and subsonic anti ship cruise missile for your invisible CBG:enjoy:


AWACS to locate CBG? Looks like you forgot earth curvature..
 
.
AWACS to locate CBG? Looks like you forgot earth curvature..
So what, isn't impossible, and he said that 100 Km of the coast of pakistan sir, its quite possible that AWACS flying like 50 -150 inland can easily decteted by AWACS

The radar provides 300 degree coverage and has an instrumental range of 450 km and detection range of 350 km in a dense hostile electronic warfare environment—in heavy radar clutter and at low target altitudes. In addition to this, the radar is also capable ofidentifying friends or foes, and has a sea surveillance mode.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erieye

  • ZDK-03: A variant designed specifically for export to the Pakistan Air Force. Consists of a Chinese AESA radar mounted on the Y-8F600 platform.[13] The radar is reported to have a greater range than that of the PAF's Saab 2000 Erieye AEW&C radar[14] and the aircraft incorporates open architecture electronics to make future upgrades easier to implement.[15] Delivery of the first aircraft to the Pakistan Air Force was expected by the end of 2010.[14] The first aircraft was reported to have been delivered in November 2011 by Pakistani media.
 
.
So what, isn't impossible, and he said that 100 Km of the coast of pakistan sir, its quite possible that AWACS flying like 50 -150 inland can easily decteted by AWACS

The radar provides 300 degree coverage and has an instrumental range of 450 km and detection range of 350 km in a dense hostile electronic warfare environment—in heavy radar clutter and at low target altitudes. In addition to this, the radar is also capable ofidentifying friends or foes, and has a sea surveillance mode.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erieye




    • ZDK-03: A variant designed specifically for export to the Pakistan Air Force. Consists of a Chinese AESA radar mounted on the Y-8F600 platform.[13] The radar is reported to have a greater range than that of the PAF's Saab 2000 Erieye AEW&C radar[14] and the aircraft incorporates open architecture electronics to make future upgrades easier to implement.[15] Delivery of the first aircraft to the Pakistan Air Force was expected by the end of 2010.[14] The first aircraft was reported to have been delivered in November 2011 by Pakistani media.


@Penguin may be radar detection got nothing to do with detecting ACC..
 
. .
Agreed partially but unfortunately right now we done have any saturation attack capable weapon ... cm400akg induction is not confirmed ... submarine attack is very risky for the submarine itself however will be an option after we get our chineses subs ...

We desperately need to work on anti.ship ballistic missile and induction of cm400akg in large number ... and indtegration of same with assets like p3c orion for a saturation attack as thnder can carry only limited number if cm400akg
a squadron for thunders firing its anti ship missiles(each can carry 2 while on patrol and 3 when fully loaded) from 200km away along with a single battery of zarb(400+km range) can fire over 40 missles+ in quick succession, true it will be protected by VLS antiship missiles but reaction time is small for sea hugging missles given you need over the horizon monitoring all the time which is lacking atleast till now in IN

Population vs ACC and Airforce vs ACC... Strange argument... CBG won't be stepping close to your boarders.. you need to locate ACC first to utilise your birds.. even in that scenario, your airforce can't afford to diversify it's fleet.. and you don't have naval wing..




AWACS to locate CBG? Looks like you forgot earth curvature..
as you said your self CBG wount be close to our boarder so it ends the argument over there

and no navy has dedicated wing of 2 squadrons,

for now the role is for mirages but this would go to multi rule thunders with sufficient range(1000+) and payload(3/2 antiship missles +2 short range AAM +2 BVRs, google for pictures)

PAF is focusing on its AWECs for the same reason, it has 2 times the AWECS IAF has(3? vs 8) and is acquiring more of SAAB

in future due to complete home built system, and economy of scale we will be able to operate 300 thunders or at-least 250(the order for now, 100 already completed) this would mean a good force of 350+ fighters/20 squadrons against IAF 34-42Sq

the goal for PAF is versatility and economy, the thunder was envisioned keeping that in mind, its all in one package, it would replace all types of other fighter thus at any given time PAF will have 20 squadrons for ground attack(4600kg of arsenal/ with 60-120km+glide bombs, cluster bombs, smart bombs,antirunaway and GPS guided) , air superiority/airdefence( we know of 6AAM via pictures and 2+2+2 configuration via pictures+AESA in block 3) and maritime strike package available

this is same strategy that sweden employed via its gripen fighters and the predecessor fighters against russia
 
.
Back
Top Bottom