What's new

Do British aircraft carriers have the courage to patrol Russia?

What a loser you are, you do know Type 45 DDG was right at Russia door step few years ago

Royal navy has global obligations

Chinese mean while too busy trying to get the Casino Carrier out of South China Sea before it breaks down


Analysis: Smoke and mirrors over Russia’s skirmish with a UK warship near Crimea​

Well, I remember. Then Russian fighter jets humiliated the British Junk 45.

What a loser you are, you do know Type 45 DDG was right at Russia door step few years ago

Royal navy has global obligations

Chinese mean while too busy trying to get the Casino Carrier out of South China Sea before it breaks down


Analysis: Smoke and mirrors over Russia’s skirmish with a UK warship near Crimea​

What are the "global obligations" of the UK Toilet Navy? Even Russia humiliates the British toilet navy.... Don't think that a British toilet carrier entering the South China Sea can prove that it is not a toilet carrier. This is ridiculous.

Don't misunderstand. British rubbish spends most of their time in ports and repair shops.

The British toilet carrier is the best training target ship for the world's navy.
 
Last edited:
.
What a loser you are, you do know Type 45 DDG was right at Russia door step few years ago

Royal navy has global obligations

Chinese mean while too busy trying to get the Casino Carrier out of South China Sea before it breaks down


Analysis: Smoke and mirrors over Russia’s skirmish with a UK warship near Crimea​

Different from British toilet aircraft carriers.

Liaoning Aircraft Carrier Strike Group can freely massacre the British Toilet Navy!
 
.
Different from British toilet aircraft carriers.

Liaoning Aircraft Carrier Strike Group can freely massacre the British Toilet Navy!

You mean that junk that has been copied from the Russian junk ?

Even Russia rejected Su33 and went for Mig29K for Carrier oops

Stupid Chinese even copied Su33 and call it J15 flying junk

Can you not make anything yourself without copying ?

Or maybe too thick to even copy some thing good quality like HMS QE
IMG_9997.jpeg
 
.
You mean that junk that has been copied from the Russian junk ?

Even Russia rejected Su33 and went for Mig29K for Carrier oops

Stupid Chinese even copied Su33 and call it J15 flying junk

Can you not make anything yourself without copying ?

Or maybe too thick to even copy some thing good quality like HMS QE
View attachment 949551
LOL

Screenshot_20230828_042314.jpg

Different from British toilet aircraft carriers. Liaoning Aircraft Carrier Strike Group Arbitrarily Massacre British Toilet Navy!

Even Türkiye's LHD is enough to massacre British toilet carriers... The British toilet carrier doesn't even have carrier based aircraft! :dance3:
 
.
You mean that junk that has been copied from the Russian junk ?

Even Russia rejected Su33 and went for Mig29K for Carrier oops

Stupid Chinese even copied Su33 and call it J15 flying junk

Can you not make anything yourself without copying ?

Or maybe too thick to even copy some thing good quality like HMS QE
View attachment 949551
The replica is enough to massacre the British toilet carrier!

Liaoning aircraft carrier took off and landed fighter jets 260 times in 10 days! It is 100 times the total number of fighters launched by the British toilet carrier!

The British toilet carrier is rubbish! The best mobile target ship!

Screenshot_20230826_213637.jpg
 
.
The replica is enough to massacre the British toilet carrier!

Liaoning aircraft carrier took off and landed fighter jets 260 times in 10 days! It is 100 times the total number of fighters launched by the British toilet carrier!

The British toilet carrier is rubbish! The best mobile target ship!

View attachment 949586


260 is a totally rubbish number and actually quite embarrassing but for Chinese fanboy like you its good

260 over 10 days is only 26 per day how ridiculous is that number

please dont publish it again its too embarrassing for Chinese

USN CVN Ford Class can do that in a SINGLE DAY


Ford Class can do 160 sorties a day with surges to a maximum of 220 sorties a day in times of crisis

thats almost 10 times the Chinese Carrier
 
.
260 is a totally rubbish number and actually quite embarrassing but for Chinese fanboy like you its good

260 over 10 days is only 26 per day how ridiculous is that number

please dont publish it again its too embarrassing for Chinese

USN CVN Ford Class can do that in a SINGLE DAY


Ford Class can do 160 sorties a day with surges to a maximum of 220 sorties a day in times of crisis

thats almost 10 times the Chinese Carrier
oh. British toilet carriers never take off fighter jets. The Liaoning aircraft carrier launched fighter jets in 10 days is 260 times that of the British toilet carrier!

British rubbish will always be rubbish.

This is why one Liaoning can massacre Britain's two big toilets!

MTXX_MH20230826_183712554.jpg
 
.
oh. British toilet carriers never take off fighter jets. The Liaoning aircraft carrier launched fighter jets in 10 days is 260 times that of the British toilet carrier!

British rubbish will always be rubbish.

This is why one Liaoning can massacre Britain's two big toilets!

View attachment 949622


260 is a totally rubbish number and actually quite embarrassing but for Chinese fanboy like you its good

260 over 10 days is only 26 per day how ridiculous is that number

please dont publish it again its too embarrassing for Chinese

USN CVN Ford Class can do that in a SINGLE DAY


Ford Class can do 160 sorties a day with surges to a maximum of 220 sorties a day in times of crisis

thats almost 10 times the Chinese Carrier
 
.
260 is a totally rubbish number and actually quite embarrassing but for Chinese fanboy like you its good

260 over 10 days is only 26 per day how ridiculous is that number

please dont publish it again its too embarrassing for Chinese

USN CVN Ford Class can do that in a SINGLE DAY


Ford Class can do 160 sorties a day with surges to a maximum of 220 sorties a day in times of crisis

thats almost 10 times the Chinese Carrier
“The Japanese defense ministry said it has been tracking the Shandong’s movements since April 7 when the Chinese carrier began conducting exercises in the Western Pacific.

During a period of 18 days until April 25, carrier-borne aircraft performed about 620 sorties. To compare, another Chinese aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, hosted about 320 sorties in 15 days last time it was operating in the same area.”


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Different from British toilet aircraft carriers. Any Chinese aircraft carrier has undergone rigorous training!

Only in one military training

Shandong Aircraft Carrier Launches Aircraft 620 Times More Than British Toilet Aircraft Carrier!

Liaoning Aircraft Carrier Launches Aircraft 320 Times More Than British Toilet Carrier!

The British toilet carrier is the world's best mobile target ship! :dance3:

260 is a totally rubbish number and actually quite embarrassing but for Chinese fanboy like you its good

260 over 10 days is only 26 per day how ridiculous is that number

please dont publish it again its too embarrassing for Chinese

USN CVN Ford Class can do that in a SINGLE DAY


Ford Class can do 160 sorties a day with surges to a maximum of 220 sorties a day in times of crisis

thats almost 10 times the Chinese Carrier
I said so. Liaoning aircraft carrier is enough to massacre two British toilet carriers!
 
.
The Chinese navy can patrol the Black Sea. But the British toilet navy can't?
Yes they can I see the documentary few months back their type 45 petroled black Sea

I said so. Liaoning aircraft carrier is enough to massacre two British toilet carriers!
Why not you massacre so called British toilet carrier when it sail into South China Sea and Taiwan straight???
 
Last edited:
.
@waz I was under the impression that it's frowned upon to call out people publicly
 
.
Yes they can I see the documentary few months back their type 45 petroled black Sea


Why not you massacre so called British toilet carrier when it sail into South China Sea and Taiwan straight???
LOL, of course we saw how the Russian Air Force humiliated the British junk 45 in the Black Sea.

Although we cannot understand why the British sent toilet carriers into the South China Sea and Taiwan Sea. When it can't even fight. But we still believe that Liaoning aircraft carrier freely massacres British toilet carriers at any time!
 
. .
LOL, of course we saw how the Russian Air Force humiliated the British junk 45 in the Black Sea.
Show me the prove Sampson radar and PAAMS SAMs will roast any Su 30 junk at long ranges

Although we cannot understand why the British sent toilet carriers into the South China Sea and Taiwan Sea. When it can't even fight. But we still believe that Liaoning aircraft carrier freely massacres British toilet carriers at any time!
The question is that why you don't destroyed so called toilet carrier when they were sailing through South China Sea and Taiwan straight

Because you know if you trying to do that F35 on British carrier will roast your junk 15 before anything they will try to attack British carrier
 
Last edited:
.
Show me the prove Sampson radar and PAAMS SAMs will roast any Su 30 junk at long ranges


The question is that why you don't destroyed so called toilet carrier when they were sailing through South China Sea and Taiwan straight

Because you know if you trying to do that F35 on British carrier will roast your junk 15 before anything they will try to attack British carrier
junk 45 :rofl:

Screenshot_20230830_183106.jpg

Like I said. The British toilet navy is only suitable for ports and repair shops! :dance3:
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom