gslv mk3
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2012
- Messages
- 13,840
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
haha saying the king of all trolls with -27 dislikes.
No amount of ranting about likes or dislikes can mask your ignorance of basic arithmetic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
haha saying the king of all trolls with -27 dislikes.
Why is it useless exactly? It has a flight ceiling of >16km, the speed of the MRBM is irrelevent as the BARAK-8 won't be chasing the projectile.but BARAK-8 is for supersonic and subsonic anti-ship missile, it is useless for MRBM's warheads traveling Mach-5 and above, you need something like SM-3, SM-6 or ASTER-30 for your navy for intercepting MRBM
We use Phalanx,SMASH n chinese 730 and LD2000.prove it
also they says pakistan also have ak 630
man where you get those figures on bahrat rashakak sh!t siteYou did not answer my question, Typically all the MIRV enabled missiles are on ICBMs or long-range ballistic systems with a minimum strike range of over 6,000 km. Therefore, it is difficult to believe that Pakistan has developed an MIRV-enabled missile with a range of just over 2,000 km.
dont need to answer about where the war heads landed to barking dogs from across the border.No amount of ranting about likes or dislikes can mask your ignorance of basic arithmetic.
prove it
also they says pakistan also have ak 630
dont need to answer about where the war heads landed to barking dogs from across the border.
keep watching, keep getting shocked. more to come
Yes, because now one of the world's most capable sea-based AD systems (EL/M-2048+ BARAK-8) becomes null and void /s
CLOWNS, taking a page out of your daddy China's book with empty threats?
Again with this nonsenseOnly clown here is you mate.
Barak 8 with a maximum speed of Mach 2 is not designed to hit ballistic missiles but aircraft and cruise missiles.
I am not sure how effective this claimed Pakistan ballistic missile is, but Barak 8 sure will not be capable of intercepting it.
Half of these don't know what they are saying here.Just spewing random arse craps..Yawn...you shouldn't waste time trolling & should rather learn basic arithmetic.
It will help you with your 'programming'.
Again with this nonsense
1) Mach 2 is NOT the top speed of the BARAK-8
2) Speed is IRRELEVENT unless you are chasing down an enemy missile, for head-on or off bore shots the BARAK-8 will be more than up to the job.
what logic you have sir the why world is developing sophisticated naval and land based ABM shield by your logic, PAC-2 and 3 is enough for USA and S-300 and its versions s enough for Russia, and why you developing ABM shields from your own if you have BARAK-8 in your hand, and the speed of the MRBM is irrelevent as the BARAK-8 won't be chasing the projectile. so what is chashing ping pong balls speed does matters its a shor to medium range SAMs warhead speed faster than your BARAK-8 speed warhead landed first on its target than aproching BARAK-8 MisssileWhy is it useless exactly? It has a flight ceiling of >16km, the speed of the MRBM is irrelevent as the BARAK-8 won't be chasing the projectile.
And you guys still haven't answered my simple question, how exactly are you going to target a mobile target as small as a CBG 100s of kms from your coast?