IceCold
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- May 1, 2007
- Messages
- 19,236
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
That's rich coming from the likes of Nepalis.Chinese client state of Pakistan cannot afford to make China unhappy LOL.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's rich coming from the likes of Nepalis.Chinese client state of Pakistan cannot afford to make China unhappy LOL.
Each country should weight pros and cons of its diplomatic decisions. Personally, I believe that a US-Pakistan relation is much more beneficial for Pakistan than the Sino-Pak relation. It is because we are constantly in need of financial assistance and will remain that way for the foreseeable future. China, practically, is too petty with finances and all their assistance is in the shape of loans and/or advances with conditions attached (interest on finances or materialistic). Whereas the US has generally been happy just with services and is a whole lot generous with financial assistance than any other country. What we need is to walk a fine line between both the US and China with inclination towards our own benefits on each matter.
Furthermore, the US has a hegemony on global politics and finances; it is outright insane antagonizing the US. US can very simply crush Pakistani economy and China will sit in a corner and watch, just as the US did to North Korea, Iran and Afghanistan amongst other countries which have faced the US wrath. And worst of all is the unrealistic fear that the US is after our Nuclear Weapons. It is my opinion that the US only cares that our Nuclear Weapons do not fall into the wrong hands and hence has game planned eventualities but those are only in circumstances where the Military is defeated by terrorists/extremists and so negligible and inconsequential.
That's rich coming from the likes of Nepalis.
You still cling onto delusion? Pakistan is able to depend on US for something? Rather than try stay neutral and please both side which end up you getting nothing. Why not make your position clear and stand with the one who will always support u?although a bold step but to me it seems it will have consequences though we already are going through in certain forms.
it also seems our foreign ministry is not keeping a balance when it comes to China and US which leads to, we are not clear with our foreign policy and still taking influences.
but, this time there may not be much hue and cry because it is China this time? then this too is wrong indeed.
You still cling onto delusion? Pakistan is able to depend on US for something? Rather than try stay neutral and please both side which end up you getting nothing. Why not make your position clear and stand with the one who will always support u?
You still cling onto delusion? Pakistan is able to depend on US for something? Rather than try stay neutral and please both side which end up you getting nothing. Why not make your position clear and stand with the one who will always support u?
you seems don't know the ground realities or do i say i am talking about my country and we have reservations even with CPEC.
we are trapped with countless institutions, organizations, banks and many other security and human rights related departments that work in several ways particularly related to economy. we cannot ignore them.
these all can play with us anytime they want or to serve their purposes on geopolitics, one example is FATF. and if i continue you will get bored.
and i come to your point:
"Why not make your position clear and stand with the one who will always support u?"
ok support us:
improve balance of trade with us
remove duty from Pakistan imports into China
get us out of FATF
influence IMF, World Bank, ADB and other financial institutions to ease up
to some extent convert CPEC projects into "support your partner"
help us establish trade with the countries that you can influence
we are defaulting on committed tariff on power projects under CPEC, so?
we are defaulting on loan pay back, so?
any single of above will never be served that is what i am sure and the world is always this way hence we have to deal with them our way as those are either our blunders or are imposed.
Hell yeah...**** democracyIslamabad believes both countries can engage on the subject at an 'opportune time in the future'
Kamran Yousaf
December 08, 2021
ISLAMABAD:
Pakistan has decided to skip the summit on democracy being convened by President Joe Biden in a rebuke to the White House that may have serious implications for the already strained relationship between the two countries.
The announcement was made by the Foreign Office (FO) just hours before the two-day summit is to kick start after days of in-house consultations.
No reason was cited by the FO in the official handout of virtually snubbing the US invite but multiple factors played a part. One of the reasons includes the exclusion of China from the summit while the overall state of the relationship between the two countries also compelled Islamabad to stay away from the democracy summit.
Read more: No change in America's Pak-Afghan policy
It is believed that President Biden's move to continue to ignore Prime Minister Imran Khan also made it difficult for Islamabad to attend the summit on democracy.
The US president is hosting the summit on December 9 and 10 and has invited leaders from over 100 countries. Pakistan was amongst the only four South Asian countries which were invited to the summit. Others included India, Maldives and Nepal.
"We are thankful to the United States for inviting Pakistan for participation in the Summit for Democracy, being held virtually on 9-10 December 2021," the foreign office said in a statement.
"Pakistan is a large functional democracy with an independent judiciary, vibrant civil society, and a free media. We remain deeply committed to further deepening democracy, fighting corruption, and protecting and promoting the human rights of all citizens. In recent years, Pakistan has instituted wide-ranging reforms aimed at advancing these goals. These reforms have yielded positive results," the official communique read.
Also read: Pakistan denies airspace accord with US
It went on to emphasise that Pakistan values its partnership with the US which it wishes to expand both bilaterally as well as in terms of regional and international cooperation.
"We remain in contact with the US on a range of issues and believe that we can engage on this subject at an opportune time in the future," the statement said while politely rejecting the US invitation.
"Pakistan will, meanwhile, continue to support all efforts aimed towards strengthening dialogue, constructive engagement, and international cooperation for the advancement of our shared goals," it concluded.
Instead of going all that road why not just say the simple shorten version which is ''sanctions and trade blockade'' avoidance
so sanctions and trade blockade is what you welcomes with open arms.
having no thoughts of ones own, nothing to share and bragging about here and there favoring one ditching other, what does your credibility tells you besides?
Not surprised as Biden is ignoring Pakistan. All due to Organizations like TLP,TTP, and other 72 banned jidahi organization & Incident like Sialkot and Pakistan most vulnerable country for minorities . No wonder World don't take us serious. Imran Khan always has soft for Jihadi organizations. We need some secular leader to save Pakistan.am i dreaming ?
Look I never said I would welcome it and one gotta do what one gotta do to avoid that but you just took the long road to explain that simple part
comprehensive reply is necessary sometimes, it is needed to avoid long useless discussions.
besides they way you quoted me to him, my reply to you was to that very statement and that you rather come up with some thing constructive and debatable.