What's new

Pakistan to install air defence system at Pak-Afghan border

Robbers who failed to steal should not alarm the police :cheers:

Killing Osama bin Laden using stealth helicopters .... is not robbery. It's bravery and determination.

Sarkozy very aptly saluted American tenacity, when Osama was killed.

Drones are a part of War on Terror (and Pakistan is supposed to be on US side in this war).

Drones or no drones .... terrorist santuaries in Pakistan must be eliminated, preferably by Pakistani forces itself.

Intenational forces (including drones etc) can help ..... but key onus of eliminating this is on Pakistan itself.
 
. .
Killing Osama bin Laden using stealth helicopters .... is not robbery. It's bravery and determination.

Sarkozy very aptly saluted American tenacity, when Osama was killed.

Drones are a part of War on Terror (and Pakistan is supposed to be on US side in this war).

Drones or no drones .... terrorist santuaries in Pakistan must be eliminated, preferably by Pakistani forces itself.

Intenational forces (including drones etc) can help ..... but key onus of eliminating this is on Pakistan itself.

Agreed and that is exactly what we are propagating. As far as the question "which side is Pakistan on" is concerned please keep in mind that Pakistan is on Pakistan's side. Choosing any other side would be insanely stupid.
 
.
Nothing will happen - the US will not go to war with Pakistan for the loss of a few drones, any incursion by the US can be construed as an act of war, according to the UN charter, the US and it's allies are in no state to go to war, with a regional power like Pakistan.

Case in point, Iran is developing nuclear weapons openly defying the "international community" even capturing a state of the art drone, what happened diddly squat.

no one knows wats going on behind the scenes,do not forget that you have to protect eastern border as well(congress needs to divert public attention from all these scam allegations on her).All your wet dreams about India fighting two front war will become reality but with a slight change that pakistan will be fighting a two front war (by fighting i mean losing).
 
.
Killing Osama bin Laden using stealth helicopters .... is not robbery. It's bravery and determination.

Really? 25 heavily armed and highly trained guys all up against one guy? It was just a routine Special Forces operation. It wasn't hard for them.

Sarkozy very aptly saluted American tenacity, when Osama was killed.

And who cares what he thinks?

Drones are a part of War on Terror (and Pakistan is supposed to be on US side in this war).

Drones or no drones .... terrorist santuaries in Pakistan must be eliminated, preferably by Pakistani forces itself.

Intenational forces (including drones etc) can help ..... but key onus of eliminating this is on Pakistan itself.

That is unless they are authorized to operate in Pakistan. Civilians getting killed by drone attacks, coupled with the allied Pakistani soldiers being killed by NATO forces does not bode well for Pakistani sentiments. And that can apply to any country.

Imagine if an Iranian aircraft went into US airspace? I am sure they'd be in all out war.

---------- Post added at 06:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:43 PM ----------

no one knows wats going on behind the scenes,do not forget that you have to protect eastern border as well(congress needs to divert public attention from all these scam allegations on her).All your wet dreams about India fighting two front war will become reality but with a slight change that pakistan will be fighting a two front war (by fighting i mean losing).

Why are you bringing India into the picture? You gonna go to war or something?
 
. .
Agreed and that is exactly what we are propagating. As far as the question "which side is Pakistan on" is concerned please keep in mind that Pakistan is on Pakistan's side. Choosing any other side would be insanely stupid.

Agreed.

In any case, it's not God's word that Drones must necessarily be used in the war on terror. Don't use it. Period.

I myself believe that Pakistani army could do a better job on the ground ... and by doing this job, Pakistani army will be fighting on Pakistan's side.

They do have a quite a task to accomplish though. The next hidden Osama in Pakistan should be shot dead by Pakistani army, not by American stealth raids.
 
.
Really? 25 heavily armed and highly trained guys all up against one guy? It was just a routine Special Forces operation. It wasn't hard for them.

So, bravery and determination to you ..... is to hijack planes and kill thousands of people?

Do you have a brother ... wife ... sister ... father? Now imagine for a minute, one of these (or all of these) are no longer in your life .... taken away by death on 9/11.

How do you feel about this one guy, now?

In any case, hiding Osama was not a one guy job. It was an attack against Al Qaeda.
 
.
Assalam alaikum

JonAsad, it is not the american , yeh sab hamary gadhar jo hum ko dara tay hain

amrieeka yeh ker day ga , wo ker day ga , imf will not give money world bank also etc

TARIQ
 
.
this is not a kite flying competition, before the US enters your space it will destroy every radar, major missile threat and military airport/station from hundred miles away, hell from the indian ocean if need be. you will cease to have 80 or 90% of your communications in the first 48 hrs ...

Your country ate its humble pie in front of the Iranians and in front of the cameras broadcasting it to the world.

Same thing will occur should Pakistan action this policy.

The American stance would be the same, "No action would be taken because they are at fault for violation of a country's sovereignty" :azn:
 
.
Killing Osama bin Laden using stealth helicopters .... is not robbery. It's bravery and determination.

Sarkozy very aptly saluted American tenacity, when Osama was killed.

Drones are a part of War on Terror (and Pakistan is supposed to be on US side in this war).

Drones or no drones .... terrorist santuaries in Pakistan must be eliminated, preferably by Pakistani forces itself.

Intenational forces (including drones etc) can help ..... but key onus of eliminating this is on Pakistan itself.

How many drones deployed and used around the world are actually meant for hunting Osama Bin Laden? Drones can be used to carry out attacks, surveillance and data gathering and by doing so without consent is equivalent to stealing or violating a nation's sovereignty (which is considered to be an act of war) my friend.
 
.
Your country ate its humble pie in front of the Iranians and in front of the cameras broadcasting it to the world.

Same thing will occur should Pakistan action this policy.

The American stance would be the same, "No action would be taken because they are at fault for violation of a country's sovereignty" :azn:

There is no "humble pie" involved.

2011 has been a high year, in the war on terror. Off course, the king pin Osama was eliminated.

It was US victory, Pakistan's victory ... and everybody who is against terror won. (Yes, your China too had to celebrate it ... they couldn't afford to look, the odd man out).

However, the war on terror still needs closure. So, it doesn't mean that with Osama gone .... it job finished.

And locationally, Afghanistan and Pakistani tribal areas continue to remain the front lines, in this war.

But the world is winning against Al Qaeda .... not the other way round.


There hope ..... and no reason for "humble pie" terms. The war on terror is being won.
 
.
How many drones deployed and used around the world are actually meant for hunting Osama Bin Laden?

Well, most ..if not all.

If not, then let's have your estimate first? - 90%, 60%, 5% ???

And drones or no drones is not the issue.

The issue is to find a better alternative to drones. .... and the solution lies with Pakistan, only.
 
.
There is no "humble pie" involved.

Tell it to the Iranians. :lol:

There hope ..... and no reason for "humble pie" terms. The war on terror is being won.

At the cost of Iraq, Afghan, Pakistan or even American lives abroad? I think the Iraqis, Afghanis and Pakistanis will differ in their opinions. It's practically a fight "to keep America safe at your own cost".

Anyway, lets not try and divert the attention away from the fact that America ate its humble pie by losing a drone to Iran and backed down on what was expected of them, military or sabotage actions. So same would occur should Pakistan actually action a similar policy to bring down these drones.

---------- Post added at 05:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:14 PM ----------

Well, most ..if not all.

If not, then let's have your estimate first? - 90%, 60%, 5% ???

And drones or no drones is not the issue.

The issue is to find a better alternative to drones. .... and the solution lies with Pakistan, only.

Is that so? Perhaps that is why America is now giving them away for free, starting with Iran? :azn:
 
.
Tell it to the Iranians. :lol:

No, tell it to self-deluded chinese fanboys.

Only they think that the world (specifically, their prime enemy USA) is eating a "humble pie" in war on terror.

Facts make it clear than 2011 was high-point in the war on terror.

It's practically a fight "to keep America safe at your own cost".

It's a fight to make Karachi, Swat ... and even Xinjiang safe. Ask your government.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom