Pakistan to grant consular access to Indian spy Kulbhushan on Friday: FO

[Tom M]

Any report of him in the Indian media??..don't think Pakistan will trade Jhadav for Col. retd. Habib Zahir...and yes he was retired.

And only India can stoop to a lower level like capturing Col. Habib...

No nothing in India news. Moreover, regarding low level argument, Every agency try and capitalize on the opportunity available. Nothing new I guess. Well who and what set the standards of espionage and counter espionage ???

 

[The Eagle]

Read the judgement directly from ICJ and not the BS your government and media are peddling. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/168/168-20190717-PRE-01-00-EN.pdf

The ICJ took decision on eight points and each point was won unanimously by India. Only one voting against was the Pakistani judge.

Not the judgment but a press release which states "Unofficial" on top of it and the same is about providing consular access to KJ. This is not a judgment, check again instead of believing into the lies of India Government that is famous for the twists and diversions.

 

[Tom M]

And Tom is back

Yep. I guess you always need some TOM to "TANGO" here.

 

[Trango Towers]

Yep. I guess you always need some tome to "TANGO" here.

Tome....yes...and TANGO...NO. Only Indians dance needlessly

 

[Tom M]

Tome....yes...and TANGO...NO. Only Indians dance needlessly

Wow, too fast before correcting a typo, huh ????

Well keep it up, you will get your chance a dance. Be patient, nothing is over yet, it's a process ongoing.

 

[N.Siddiqui]

The ICJ took decision on eight points and each point was won unanimously by India. Only one voting against was the Pakistani judge.

And what was the result of that eight points won by India that include the 'jurisdiction of ICJ to hear the case and consular access to Jhadav'.

 

[KhanBaba2]

Not the judgment but a press release which states "Unofficial" on top of it and the same is about providing consular access to KJ. This is not a judgment, check again instead of believing into the lies of India Government that is famous for the twists and diversions.

The case page
https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/168

The judgement. You can go to page 40 for the voting.
https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/168/168-20190717-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf

The summary (Not official)
https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/168/168-20190717-SUM-01-00-EN.pdf

Hope that satisfies you.

 

[BATMAN]

And I just wrote down an example to your suggestion that I actually know.


Justice for Lieutenant Colonel Retired Habib Zahir

TBH, its really sad for a family to not even know the whereabouts of a loved ones.

I think Pakistan should have presented this case of kidnapping in ICJ as well.
Apparently civilian authorities in Pakistan are mentally enslaved by India.
It reflects from range of decisions taken by current previous regimes of Pakistan.

 

[Mirza Jatt]

You haven't answered my question though!

understand your pain in *** completely

 

[Mirza Jatt]

All India asked after you captured KJ was consular access. Why did you deny then when you knew you would have to give access when India forces you through ICJ. I haven't seen the video cuz you are running away from my question... My point here is.. Why did you deny access then.. and are allowing access now!! Rest am sure your lawyer is amazing... answer my question now.

For this very reason, that case was internationalized, India stands helpless in front of full media glare at the ICJ, threadbare arguments by Pakistan jurist Khawar Qureshi....

@Mangus Ortus Novem @RIWWIR hope you people have heard the great arguments by him...

 

[Mirza Jatt]

But you said NO consular access.. so once India calls their dad ICJ (as per your logic) Pakistan steps back on its firm denial? Is that what you are saying?

Yah yah first they need help from USA about Abhi now ICJ.Pakistan treating india """jao baitaa pehly apny abbu ko bulaa ky laoo bachon sy hum baat nahi karty ""

 

[Mirza Jatt]

Nice shayari. Anyway so answer this... Did Pakistan backtrack on its FIRM DECISION of not allowing consular access after India forced you through ICJ?

Ghalib also complained, something like that:

"Jama kartay ho kyun raqeebon ko
Ik tamaasha hua, gila na hua"

 

[Mirza Jatt]

Ok I won't go into all other request as you say since its futile on this forum. Let's talk on the point that you agree since it will be easy for both of us... You said no consular access when we requested so why giving access now? It's clear that India basically snatched the access from you through ICJ inspite you not allowing.

Lol.. India went crying to the ICJ and prayed for access along with other cries (prayers) that were treated as drama and rejected. Playing macho after an episode as such, is not new from India.

 

[N.Siddiqui]

All India asked after you captured KJ was consular access. Why did you deny then when you knew you would have to give access when India forces you through ICJ. I haven't seen the video cuz you are running away from my question... My point here is.. Why did you deny access then.. and are allowing access now!! Rest am sure your lawyer is amazing... answer my question now.

Initially Pakistan argued that according to Vienna Convention, spies and persons on espionage can be denied the consular access...

India has sought “acquittal, release and return”...denied all by ICJ.

Also whom India want a consular access, Husssian Mubarak Patel, the businessmen or Kulbushan Yadav...the serving Indian Naval commander...on a lighter vein.

 

[undercover JIX]

Pak offers consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav; evaluating proposal, says India


https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...han-jadhav-on-friday/articleshow/70481552.cms