What's new

Pakistan to go to War with India over Kashmir?

.
Indian supreme Court has no power in this matter it's president order and a statuary law

They can't struck it because it doesn't violated basic frame of Constitution which are fundemental rights
So, Indian President can overwrite the constitution. Nice. Wonder why Punjab and Nagaland is worried now.
 
.
:agree:
come on china really:p:
China took over militarily and controls: One area called Aksai Chin in the northeastern part of the region, equaling 20% of Kashmir. India also alleges Pakistan has ceded 3,220 square miles inKashmir to China. Srinagar is the summer capital city in Jammu and Kashmir state.
 
.
So, Indian President can overwrite the constitution. Nice. Wonder why Punjab and Nagaland is worried now.
Because they are full integration territory without special stays
Punjab ??? I don't know what are t u about its a full Indian state with all fedral powers

President of India is head of judiciary itself
Chief Justice's are appointed by his recommendation

Constitution of India itself came into being on 26 Feb 1950 when. It was signed by First president of India Dr rajendra Prasad that is the day celebrate as Republic day each year

Yes SC has power to struck down Laws but only if it violated Basic frame of Constitution

But Paliament has power to amend Constitution itself as it was created by parliament itself
 
.
Because they are full integration territory without special stays
Punjab ??? I don't know what are t u about its a full Indian state with all fedral powers

President of India is head of judiciary itself
Chief Justice's are appointed by his recommendation

Constitution of India itself came into being on 26 Feb 1950 when. It was signed by First president of India Dr rajendra Prasad that is the day celebrate as Republic day each year

Yes SC has power to struck down Laws but only if it violated Basic frame of Constitution

But Paliament has power to amend Constitution itself as it was created by parliament itself
But, still its disputed territory in every UN and Shimla accord and its well documented. This Indian govt onside action will not change the status of Kashmir. Only Kashmiri people can decide which side they have to go under Maharaja signed agreement. And Nehru endorsed that agreement.
 
.
But, still its disputed territory in every UN and Shimla accord and its well documented. This Indian govt onside action will not change the status of Kashmir. Only Kashmiri people can decide which side they have to go under Maharaja signed agreement. And Nehru endorsed that agreement.
It is disputed territory yes
But both Pakistani's and Indian violated UN resolution itself

Read first conditions of resolutions

Please show where is it written in instrument of accession

You guys thinks India. Diplomacy immature
That they will not well studied
 
.
It is disputed territory yes
But both Pakistani's and Indian violated UN resolution itself

Read first conditions of resolutions

Please show where is it written in instrument of accession

You guys thinks India. Diplomacy immature
That they will not well studied
Modi didn t give any legal reason or some strong point to colonize Kashmir. He only said due to terrorism , he took this action. So, all Kashmiri who are agitating against Indian forces are terrorist. It is biggest insult of Kashmiri nation. A foreign occupier tell them , because you are terrorist , under pretext of 911 theory, so they have all right to occupy the area and present the that theory as valid reason. Well, may be this wise political move by BJP to sell the world , but still people of Kashmir are the last one who will decide the fate of Kashmir.
 
.
Modi has put President Trump’s trump card in the international diplomacy- the Afgan solution- in jeopardy due to the Kashmir fiasco!!! IK has nicely delivered a ball deep into President Trump’s court....
 
.
Indian supreme Court has no power in this matter it's president order and a statuary law

They can't struck it because it doesn't violated basic frame of Constitution which are fundemental rights

And it's a Law of the coantitution itself as it is created by parliament

Even if SC does setup a constitutional bench to review this Law

It will take 7-8 years or so do you to schedule and I don't think any SC judge India has balls to go against People will
As majority of indian population supports decision so cases will only drag

The court may put a stay on the operation of this law till the final disposal of the case. Happens all the time when a law is challenged.
 
.
I'm 100% certain that Pakistan WILL launch an invasion along the lines of OP Grand Slam (probably entirely skipping OP Gibraltar) with nuclear war-fighting (from either side, because who can trust Baniyas with NFU policy?) and possibility of multiple fronts opening in mind, the MOMENT a non-Kashmiri buys a property in Kashmir. The primary objective would be to capture as many peaks on the Pir Panjal range as possible in order to have a bird's eye view over the entire valley. We might also end up nuking using earth-penetrating bombs on a couple of hardened vital bridges, for example, in Akhnoor, who knows? The casualties may run into tens of thousands (higher than all previous wars combined) just to capture these peaks, but it's a do or die situation now. At least it would forever put an end to the terror of artillery/mortar bombardment on Azad Kashmiri civilians. THAT ALONE would be the reason enough to justify an invasion.
 
.
Today, Imran Khan called in senior journalist and here is there analysis. Where it seems in very near future , Khan and PA has decided to have combat mission inside Kashmir. That may turn ugly and Pakistan has no choice. IK perceives BJP move on Kashmir as RSS mindst of religious based expansion and it need to be defeated, before it hurt LOC. Also US Taliban talks in limbo, due to Indian move.


Indian supreme court has already been called in for face saving, and very likely there will strike down 370. The international outcry has been more than anticipated, and whether indians accept it or not, but the move has already backfired.

So hold your horses, there won't be war drums rolling.......
 
.
:agree:
China took over militarily and controls: One area called Aksai Chin in the northeastern part of the region, equaling 20% of Kashmir. India also alleges Pakistan has ceded 3,220 square miles inKashmir to China. Srinagar is the summer capital city in Jammu and Kashmir state.
Chinas objections only pretains to ladakh
 
.
The court may put a stay on the operation of this law till the final disposal of the case. Happens all the time when a law is challenged.
It can't stay law passed by Paliament
Because it consitutional statuary law which is consitution itself. which provided to Paliament through special presidential order under 356b . President is head of Judiciary itself and appoints cheif justice

it can only be strucked by consitutional bench 'IF' it violated basic frame of consitution

Govt has also power of ordinance of case carry on.Based on its interpretation of law that is why Govt has cabinet minister or Law minister in ministry of justice and law
And attorney journal to interpret laws according to executive for governance

SC is only interpreter it cannot consitutionally amend or create laws of its owns
It has lato respect laws passed by parliament as Constitution of India itself created by parliament itself

It can review the law and can struck it down which takes time as I mentioned

In any democracy Executive always has certain power over execution and governance

What next if war decared if Nuclear Missile's launched towards Delhi govt will ask permission from SC to use it Executive Government powers from judges of the SC ???

Indian supreme court has already been called in for face saving, and very likely there will strike down 370. The international outcry has been more than anticipated, and whether indians accept it or not, but the move has already backfired.

So hold your horses, there won't be war drums rolling.......
They have no legal power to struck Constitutional law

What next SC had power to struck whole Constitution itself or call India. Army to over throw Indian government and called itself only authority in India with not executive

Under which power they can struck down
Constitutional law passed by Paliament if it doesn't so violation of basic frame

There are certain condition for strucking down law passed by Paliament

SC know it's limitations when it comes to mending it affairs with Executive

What if executive gives SC middle finger like Indra Gandhi then what ???
 
Last edited:
.
This time it is serious, no more just keeping the Indian troops busy but to kick them out. China might get involved too.

I agree. Pak has few cards to play but to do something daring, suicidal even.

India must avail as many high tech surveillance toys from US and Israel to prevent incursions by Pak or Pak/China combo.
 
.
It is disputed territory yes
But both Pakistani's and Indian violated UN resolution itself

Read first conditions of resolutions

Please show where is it written in instrument of accession

You guys thinks India. Diplomacy immature
That they will not well studied

First show us instrument of accession...It is a lie concocted by Hindu Indians
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom