You should try to add something to the topic in hand for the knowledge and interest of the naive readers like me instead of self-glorification and then throwing veiled tantrum against DG ISPR. In fact, such psy ops are being done by few shameless that keeps coming to the board and try to confuse people just so that they couldn't take on Pakistan in conventional as well as unconventional mediums.
Almost everyone is supposed to be the General in this Forum and for the credibility, no one claims as such instead members do share plausible opinion or at-least analysis without claiming themselves of some kind of this & that. DG ISPR does hybrid-warfare strikes but in-fact, wouldn't fool the public for mere applause by risking ISPR's credibility as well as of Pakistan. Just so that someone is not able to sell their side of beans in demean any development, does not mean that one should resort to such level "biased leak" to say.
You met him or not and yet you try to damage his repute before own public and calling him not trust worthy because he is running information warfare which is in-fact against India? Credentials does not allow anyone to claim as such on the personal grounds in open forums like this which is nothing less than attention seeking. DG ISPR does run info warfare but against enemies and on other hand, does not share everything to the public for certain reasons involving security risks & operational secrecy. In this day & age of digital advancement & either one serving in the field or has the relation or having links; can't be made fool long enough. At-least not the hostiles that will not miss any chance to downgrade or expose any fabricated effort in-case subjected test is nothing & was merely show-off. Never undermine the sabotage capability of your enemy hence, no-one will risk repute of whole country, defence line & institutions by merely faking the test or bragging unnecessarily or by exaggerating. In-fact what is told may not be the 30% of what is really achieved by the test(s) in regard to verification & validation of system(s) with overwhelming capability.
You have anything to add to the subject, you can do so without any hesitation but in-case if you are what you claim and you don't have any clearance to speak; better not to and stay away. Even if you are trying to counter fake analysis; you are still giving away what you claim for which, you are not supposed to speak.
This is an open forum and not everyone is expert for every other subject or related to respective department at all hence, the difference of opinion based upon information available in the public domain and as per personal analysis/reading/findings/knowledge which is the beauty of quality discussion.
No more self glorification & demeaning the figures.
Regards,