Congratulations,What is the status of Timur and Shaheen3??
Tamur chunti to dewar pe chartey daikh raha hay, air shaheen paharoon ke chatanoo pe basera ker raha hay
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Congratulations,What is the status of Timur and Shaheen3??
@Oscar @The Deterrent @Hyperion
What is the viability of this system with a range of 290kms for an anti armor role?
If or not it would be viable to use this platform to deliver submunitions (clusters) to destroy invading enemy tanks and other armored vehicles?
Ask the Indians why DRDO keeps testing Prithvi-II again and again.Strange, don't know why Pakistan keep testing same old missiles testing again again despite very few kilometers, I think, something wrong on malfuction issues so they test it to just make sure work effectively AND India move forward fast to develop new testing and experiments.
Why RED paint on the top of the missile head? It make look very silly.
@Oscar, just spoke to a contact..... as the statement says...''Another Milestone''.....certain criteria has been increased. !!
True however it is apparent now that no new missiles with extended range are developed in this moment in time. Considering how fast our missile program really was, it is sad that our most advance missile has a range of only 2500 Kms which does not even cover the whole of India.
Pakistan should make some modifications to use these surface to Surface missiles against Surface Sea Targets.
No PR84/2014-ISPR
Dated: April 22, 2014Rawalpindi - April 22, 2014:
Pakistan today conducted a successful training launch of Short Range Surface to Surface Ballistic Missile Hatf III (Ghaznavi), which can carry nuclear and conventional warheads to a range of 290 kilometers. The successful launch concluded the Field Training Exercise of Strategic Missile Group of Army Strategic Forces Command.
The Training Launch was witnessed by the Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, General Rashad Mahmood, Director General Strategic Plans Division, Lieutenant General Zubair Mahmood Hayat, Commander Army Strategic Forces Command, Lieutenant General Obaid Ullah Khan, Chairman NESCOM, Mr Muhammad Irfan Burney and other senior military officials and scientists.
Addressing the troops in the exercise area, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee commended the troops on achieving technical and operational excellence in operating the state of the art weapon system. He expressed his satisfaction over the training goals achieved during the exercise and expected that the officers and men entrusted with the task of deterring aggression would continue to maintain professional excellence.
The Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, General Rashad Mahmood also congratulated all the Scientists and Engineers for the successful launch of Ghaznavi Missile, as another milestone which has further strengthened the defence potential of Pakistan besides assuring peace in the region.
The successful test has also been warmly appreciated by the President and Prime Minister of Pakistan who congratulated the participating troops, scientists and engineers on their outstanding achievement.
link: Welcome to ISPR
u left hamid dimahim sorri if some one thinks im trolling but couldnt stop myself
looks like Pakistan as a nation loves its many "hamids"
few which always love to be in news like
1. zaid hamid
2. Hamid gul
3.Hamid mir
did i leave some one
What makes the Ghaznavi suited for that role over other short-ranged missiles or even the cruise missiles ?
And why didn't they name a missile after me - Yaaar baaat karnaa tuuu inn seh !
@Oscar @The Deterrent @Hyperion
What is the viability of this system with a range of 290kms for an anti armor role?
If or not it would be viable to use this platform to deliver submunitions (clusters) to destroy invading enemy tanks and other armored vehicles?
This is one area which has always fascinated me. Remember the missile from iron man taking out an entire mountain... An operational warhead of similar sort with multiple launch platforms would be an interesting proposition.You are thinking of something along the lines of ATACMS... that could be done but that depends on the ability to design and test a submunitions warhead. Just throwing a cluster bomb on a rather expensive delivery platform does you no good. Having smart submunitons on board that guarantee a 80-90% chance of hitting a target on their own and killing at least 50% of them is better.
Sadly, we have nothing like the Skeet submunition on the CBU-105 or something like the BAT.
You are thinking of something along the lines of ATACMS... that could be done but that depends on the ability to design and test a submunitions warhead. Just throwing a cluster bomb on a rather expensive delivery platform does you no good. Having smart submunitons on board that guarantee a 80-90% chance of hitting a target on their own and killing at least 50% of them is better.
Sadly, we have nothing like the Skeet submunition on the CBU-105 or something like the BAT.
@Oscar , @The Deterrent , @Windjammer & @Secur .... a serious question
Don't you people think repeated test of short-range missiles like Nasar & Ghaznavi is a glimpse of Pakistan's 'operational War doctrine' which gives the impression of Pakistan's 'intention to keep war theater limited' (geographically) & in fact Pakistan has 'increased its Nuclear threshold' by adopting the 'strategy to respond in the limited area (only in the war theater)' which 'may increase the strategic risk' as the other side have a clear doctrine to respond by 'any mean & any place of her choice' ...... ???
Off course accuracy is important but when firing on enemy base or where enemy is in large number with its weapons I would fit a missile with systems which can destroy most of that base and area
High Explosive, Fuel-Air Explosive, Bunker-busting warhead, Cluster Munition etc can be used as conventional warheads.
For targeting a large number of tanks like you said, Cluster Penetration Munitions would be required.
How do one pronounce Hatf? Which remains silent, "t" or "f"?