Pakistan Successfully Tested Babur 3 Cruise Missile launch from Submarine : ISPR

[SHAH820]

India has many other missiles like (brahmos cruise Missiles & SLBM like K-4 )

technology transfer ? that means assembling french Parts .

they gave you permission to use nuclear capable missiles on their submarines ?? no ......... and turkey can not do it .


please read about kargil war & why India developed Navigation system ..............You can not use nukes without permission of China .

You can not Buy TOT of Navigation system ..........it is dependent on Navigational satellites ...................they can stop their signals anytime .............just like USA did during Kargil war .

what kind of idiot are you tell me didnt you know about technology transfer ever you heard of TERCOM .Pakistan 70% of its weaponry in Pakistan and acquiring many US made and Europe technology by technology transfer through turkey and other European countries
where india bought every thing from other nation thats why your name is on the top of most weaponry importing countries. you need permission from Russia and Europe your so called bhramos is made by russia not only india which is not more then a hyper sonic missile which can be shot down by air defence system thats why USA is not investing in hyper sonics cruise missiles rather then stealth cruise missiles every cruise missile and ballistic missile is developed in pakistan.
pakistan have navigation satellite and pakistan make navigation equipments for military and older version of babur those system was used but due to chineese navigation system is more accurate thats why we are using it
(note: in cruise missile whole map and flight path is given to the missile before firring it so it dont need navigation assistant when in flight )
live in reality not imagination your whole nation is living in

 

[Samlee]

Well you already have it. What more do you require?

By Entertainment I Meant Hypocritical Idiotic Sermons On Why We Name Our Missiles After Invaders Who Looted and Plundered

 

[Blue Marlin]

It was launched from a pontoon or from real sub, i damn care. What i care is that we have got the tech.

From what i know work was being done for years now. After successful results of earlier tests and confirming we have the tech, one of the reason the Naval arm of strategic forces was raised.

And whats the use of showing the world the tech that we have if we can't use it on our current subs, that's ridiculous. Why show someone something when the launching platform is years away. Atleast it will take 3-5 years when we get Chinese sub, why wait till then, when we can have them now.

Someone remember this: http://www.dawn.com/news/914345/pakistan-illegally-modified-us-made-missiles-white-house

Was it really a Harpoon ?

" Pakistan has denied the charge, saying it developed the missile itself. But according to the report, US intelligence agencies detected on April 23 a suspicious missile test that appeared to indicate that Pakistan had a new offensive weapon. "

well if it weren't a sub it hast to be a pontoon. i do recall rashid mahmood saying a while back that the babur slcm was tested a while back.

i thought the harpoon scenario was because of bad inteligance, suspected of being indian to cause a rift, analysts were sceptical as its range is not long enough to be effective and pakistan has the tech to make even better missiles. after allowing American inspectors to inspect pakistani harpoons they found no illegal modifications and the issue was laid to rest.

 

[TaimiKhan]

well if it weren't a sub it hast to be a pontoon. i do recall rashid mahmood saying a while back that the babur slcm was tested a while back.

i thought the harpoon scenario was because of bad inteligance, suspected of being indian to cause a rift, analysts were sceptical as its range is not long enough to be effective and pakistan has the tech to make even better missiles. after allowing American inspectors to inspect pakistani harpoons they found no illegal modifications and the issue was laid to rest.

But see the link i posted, it said American intel spotted something out at sea and Pak said its something of our own. Clearly something got launched from the sea and traveled inland to target, which was the main reason that we may have done something with Harpoons as no one expected us to have a sea to land attack capability.

Yes Rashid said and so did i more then a couple of years back that things are moving in this area.

 

[Muhammad Omar]

Wow from the video i can see Pakistan got the only capability to make missile move diagonally from the start without resurfacing the submarine....rather first heading straight and then revert to actual path....

LOL US Tomahawk Missile
NO wonder Just to troll some Indians become idiots

 

[Blue Marlin]

But see the link i posted, it said American intel spotted something out at sea and Pak said its something of our own. Clearly something got launched from the sea and traveled inland to target, which was the main reason that we may have done something with Harpoons as no one expected us to have a sea to land attack capability.

Yes Rashid said and so did i more then a couple of years back that things are moving in this area.

i thing 2009 was too long ago for a slcm test but something post 2012 sounds more realistic

 

[Karl]

No I meant in addition to the six 533 mm tubes. Experimental Qing class (of which Pakistan variant is based) was fitted with 1 650 mm torpedo tube for new generation of armaments. We'll wait and see.

???
No way in hell.
China's current AIP subs implement the 533 mm torpedo tubes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_039A_submarine

It would be crazy for the Pak navy to change from 533mm torpedoes considering it uses the DM2A4
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DM2A4

Even China's torpedoes are 533mm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yu-6_torpedo

 

[Hassan Guy]

No I meant in addition to the six 533 mm tubes. Experimental Qing class (of which Pakistan variant is based) was fitted with 1 650 mm torpedo tube for new generation of armaments. We'll wait and see.

Qing class has a dedicated VLS for cruise and ballistic missiles.

 

[Khanate]

But see the link i posted, it said American intel spotted something out at sea and Pak said its something of our own. Clearly something got launched from the sea and traveled inland to target, which was the main reason that we may have done something with Harpoons as no one expected us to have a sea to land attack capability.

Yes Rashid said and so did i more then a couple of years back that things are moving in this area.

Americans are on our case more than Indians.

Frankly, Pakistan is just screwing with India. Test a missile and then release the video at random to fudge the timelines. No wonder Indians are going berserk.

 

[Karl]

it's a testbed for new technologies, some of which will be incorporated in the subs Pakistan is buying. Obviously don't expect VLS etc...

Qing class has a dedicated VLS for cruise and ballistic missiles.

 

[Frankenstein9321]

Next step is ICBMs...then nuclear subs, 5th gen fighter, maybe space rocket....Then we are there...more or less....good times...

 

[Hassan Guy]

it's a testbed for technologies, some of which will be incorporated in the subs Pakistan is buying. Obviously don't expect VLS etc...

Then obviously if there is no VLS, the babur-3 can't improve range that much - the 533mm torpedo tube will be holding it back.

The current weapons range cannot be increased by a very significant amount, don't expect the range to double or go to 1000-1500km.
(Not even land based babur's have been able to reach this range.)

The Babur is for taking out critical military assets along the coast of india with a tactical nuclear warhead.
(1 Dwarka like raid with 1 Babur-3.)

SLBM's will be needed for launching WMD's deep into India's metropolitan areas.

 

[Karl]

No, a larger 650 mm dia tube could carry a 1500 KM range cruise missile, perhaps more if the internal is nearer 11 m in length. . Sure naval planners have taken this into account.

Then obviously if there is no VLS, the babur-3 can't improve range that much - the 533mm torpedo tube will be holding it back.

 

[Hassan Guy]

No, a larger 650 mm dia tube could carry a 1500 KM range cruise missile, perhaps more if the internal is nearer 11 m in length. . Sure naval planners have taken this into account.

It is possible in that case, but it is unknown if Pakistan's new submarines will have them.

 

[Rajput_Pakistani]

Congratulations Pakistan

It was to be the next logical step in Pakistan's deterrence development. Really thankful to untiring efforts of scientist and engineers, who are doing their best with meager resources.
I have a question and an observation.

First the question,

The impact blast was huge as if Babur-iii was carrying its payload? Was it carrying its payload or it was just shear momentum of the missile which kicked off so much dust and debris?
Your thoughts please @Rashid Mahmood @Khafee @The Deterrent

Secondly my observation.

Smaller flying objects like the size of fighter planes reflects less light. So when viewed from a certain distance always appear black or grey. Although they may have any color. Was not that the case with this footage that missile appeared grayish at start?

And Indians with all their denial and conspiracy theories