AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
Good deal , food is needed for poor and also Gas is needed as we have shortages
We are not at war with anyone
We are not at war with anyone
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
thank you .. noted
i pray your kids grow up like Nawj..and be smart as him
cheers
Some people are Dalits it's in their bloodline... Maybe my Pathan blood makes me fearless.
Hi,
Thanks for the tag.
Russia exports tonnes of Lng. They can provide us through their Yamal Lng project.
LNG export value from Russia 2021 | Statista
The value of liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports from Russia reached approximately 7.3 billion U.S.www.statista.com
The question is not whether Russia can provide Lng, but at what price? We can't afford spot buys, even at 50% discount. Dutch TTF traded above $100/mmbtu today, so we should be looking for 5 or 10 years term contract. Any long term contract price, whether through pipeline (TAPI, IP, or Russia-Kazakhstan-Uzbekistan/Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan) or seaborne (Lng) has to be lower or match our 2021 Qatar Lng contract (that is 10.2% of three months averaged Brent), which will be extremely hard in case of Lng supplies for Russia.
Unfortunately, no information regarding supposed gas sales have been made public so we can only make guesses.
For pipeline gas, Russia can make couple of plays, a separate pipeline from 1) Uzbekistan (Pipeline No. 4, Fig 2) to Pakistan via Afghanistan, but in my opinion they would simply piggyback on 2) TAPI, that is, tie in the existing CAC Pipeline (Pipeline No. 2, Fig 2) in Turkmenistan to TAPI starting point, buy extra capacity in TAPI and provide Pakistan 750-1000 mmcfd (keeping it under Gazprom's sanction limit and financially less burdening on Russia). There's is a reason why Mr. Zamir Kabulov finds Tapi pipeline idea interesting.
But all this will come into fruition only after TAPI is constructed. So, at least 3 years from the start of construction, the contract term will be much longer 20-25 years (specially if they decide for standalone Uzbekistan route).
So, if a contract (a strategic energy partnership) was indeed signed, it would be multi pronged.
1. Work on pipeline construction through Uzbekistan Route or Turkmenistan route. (Physical gas supply starting after 3-5 years)
2. In meanwhile, supply LNG (1.5mtpa or 2 cargoes/ month) through short term contract (for 3-5 years term) starting October/ November 2022.
Hope, this makes some sense.
I read somewhere Europe prefers market rates instead of long term contracts from Russia (more of a criticism to their policy). Is that true?
Pakistan is definitely looking for long term fixed contract. The estimate I came across was $6.5 per mmbtu and was said to be cheaper than Qatar long term. ( Markets have changed now I am sure we won't rush to finalise a contract in the current market).
Russian Yamal LNG plant capacity is about 16.5-milion toms per annum.
I maintain that it is absurd for Pakistan to buy gas from Russia. TAPI pipeline is and was sponsored by the USA for India to pull out of the IPI pipeline deal. Economically it is not feasible to supply LNG to Pakistan to match delivered LNG price either from Qatar or from Australia. I let the readers decide what is the likely scenario.
Do you know how long it takes to construct the pipeline ? how much it costs ? Pakistan cannot pay for it. someone will pay for it.
Pakistan's GSP+ status will expire by the end of 2023 after completing it's 10 years term, Pakistan will need to re-apply for GSP+ Status so that it can get the same facility for next 10 years.. last year EU parliament also passed a resolution demanding the cancellation of Pakistans GSP+ status for failing to ensure basic human rights, minority rights, forced labours, laws pertaining to Blasphemy etc, but EU commission didn't suspend Pakistan's GSP+ nor extended it.Vietnam and Bangladesh abstained in the UN vote against Russia. Will it affect affect their GSP status with the EU?
Thank you for your enlightening comments. Kindly share in detail, the cost and timelines associated with such projects, from Feasibility to FEED, to FID, to EPC award, to Detailed Engineering, to Procurement, to Construction, to Pre-commissioning and finally to Commissioning.
Why should Pakistan pay for the pipeline construction? If Russia or Turkmenistan or Iran wants to sell their gas, they will find a financier to finance it. Pakistan can and will be a junior shareholder (5-10% shareholding, similar to TAPI) and will contribute finances accordingly.
At this point why would Russia spend billions on such a pipeline ?
Is Pakistan large enough a market to warrant such an investment ?
you are yet to fulfil your commitments to Iran under gas pipeline. What promises do the Russians have that Pakistan won't wiggle out
Hi,
In the words of great Baron Rothschild, "the time to buy is when there's blood in the streets."
Pakistan is big enough market, and contract will not be for 1 or 2 years, but for 25-30 years. Russia is not just investing in a pipeline, but for stakes in Pakistan's economy.
Which commitments?
You are asking Russia to spend $10 billion building a pipeline to sell Pakistan $3 billion in natural gas annually The economics do not add up.
There is cost of transit & security in Central Asia & Afghanistan.
Iran built a pipeline cost hundreds of millions of dollars to supply natural gas to Pakistan and India. You have not bought a dime.
Hi,
No one is asking Russia to spend $10 Billion. I suppose you are referring to Tapi?
If you were, the $10 Billion figure is not for the construction of pipeline, the pipeline won't cost more than $5B, (for comparison, the cost of PSGP is around $3B for 1100km so for 1800km, at max its gonna be around $6B, also a part of it around 40-50% will be funneled back into Russian industries, pipelines procurement, machineries etc.), the rest is for increasing Turkmenistan's gas production and processing. The annual revenues just from ~1350mmcfd sales to Pakistan at current GSPA, will be north of $7B, for 25 years it will be more than $175B.
If you were referring to, Uzbekistan route, the cost of the pipeline will be even less (less than $5B, Gazprom operated pipeline, financed by Gazprombank). The nominal gas sales of ~750mmcfd will make them more than $3.9B per annum at todays prices (keeping Tapi's price as standard). Obviously, Pakistan can import up to 1500mcfd from Gazprom without getting penalized/ sanctioned by current US sanctions. The transit through Afghanistan will be paid by Pakistan, in Uzbekistan, shared by Gazprom and Pakistan, and through Kazakhstan paid by Gazprom, and will be part of contract price.
India opted out of it and has not signed GSPA with Iran, so no point in bringing it here. Iran backed out from financing the pipeline and hence the delays.
initially you wanted Russian natural gas. Now you want Turkmenistan natural gas. Pipeline from Russia wll cost $10 billion
you are pulling numbers out of the air. Pakistani natural gas purchases for a year are around $2.7 billion.
Pakistan gets $4.5bn facility for oil, LNG imports
Three-year trade financing facility will cover the import cost of crude, petroleum products and liquefied natural gas.www.dawn.com
Hi,
Please go through what I have written in earlier posts and the potential routes for Russian gas through Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.
Can you please provide how you came up with $10B figure and from what route?
Also, the current TAPI gas price is roughly equivalent to 12% of Brent. At today's price (~$120/bbl), it is equivalent to $14.4/mmbtu. Feel free to correct my math. The data you are quoting is from 2020 and 2021 and is not reflective of current prices. Also, Pakistan is going to buy Russian/ Turkmen/ Iranian gas on top of what it is importing now, its not a replacement.