What's new

Pakistan seeks explanation about Inu's Baluchistan remarks

Well then you lot can stop bringing up dreaming of war with India. Thats how it always starts.

Indian proxy occupation and interference had been and will be exposed so get used to it.No amount of indian bully and dalal cheerleaders can stop it. if indians can not be civil and only can think war for their "akhanda varat" dream then indians will have to face the consequences, just like in Srilanka, Nepal and in Maldives. indians are kicked out even after decades of indian run terror, interference and proxies. oh one fact, you might not realized - india CAN NOT fight a war without its own destruction; that is ultimate lesson for you.

About this thread topic
1) indian deep proxy, awami information minister, Inu got exposed.
2) And regime disowned Inu's statement as his own
3) That rendered indian effort of propaganda worthless

Just because of that indians like yourself came in drove to wadge "war"? Look who are possessing all character of fundamentalism and terrorism - you indians.
 
Last edited:
.
And he is making a big issue about just this instance because his personal lady-hero was the subject of it (a rumor...but a likely one).

Her husband had closer ties with China Pakistan and KSA. She hasn't changed her party policy. I will react exactly in the same way if someone writes something similar about Sheikh Hasina
 
. .
Her husband had closer ties with China Pakistan and KSA. She hasn't changed her party policy. I will react exactly in the same way if someone writes something similar about Sheikh Hasina

They are both worthless hags that have ruined your country.

But maybe you lot deserve them sadly.
 
.
You have an option of editing your post and having it reversed......
having it reversed eh? edited em....

you can give him negative rating for foul language, i have no problem with that. But I have problem indians using bully in every thread.
foul language eh? you provoked nearly everyone in this forum to use some!
 
.
Sorry Nair..Forget it. He edited it.

To be honest i have not gone thru enitre posts of this thread, have come across the offensive part, rated it..... After your complaint, tried searching for it and could not find it, that is the reason why i asked....

I already changed the word when someone complained about it earlier.

I have seen all kinds of anatomies being referred to in every language possible in this forum pretty much....and then these particular lot have used all kinds of filthy words (way worse than f word) in bengali to insult others and themselves. none of these got any negative ratings,

And he is making a big issue about just this instance because his personal lady-hero was the subject of it (a rumor...but a likely one).

there is no point in using foul language, however may be the provocations ...... Let us not do it....

having it reversed eh? edited em....

Done.....
 
. . .
They are both worthless hags that have ruined your country.

But maybe you lot deserve them sadly.

Bright leaders of that Generation Mujib, Zia, Tajuddin, Khaled Musharraf, Taher all perished in the multiple coups and counter coups of 80s. And I agree that the remaining ones are the sc*ms who weren't seen politically important and spared..
 
. . .
Well What you said is logical in case of typical Inter Nation relations. But Pak BD relation is atypical. Everyday in Bangladesh awami ministers criticize Pakistan, so I do not think It was something special or extraordinary from Inu. I don't disagree with you though

Actually it is a "atypical" for awami league but rest of world does not revolve around awami league "atypical" view. Rest of the world, it should be based on normal diplomatic relation between 2 countries. Just like Vietnam and US have normal relation even after a brutal war half a century ago.
 
. .
do you support his ethics of switching sides when necessary... just like moudud

It is not about taking sides. And neither is this about Moudud. It is about his stance as Information Minister of a nation and the implications coming out of such. What a minister of a country says carries weight.

Demonizing a country in its 'atypical' relationship is one thing. But, taking sides in another country's insurgency is quite another.

It's a murky world Khaled.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom