Ganymede
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 78
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
This thread is nothing but hindustanys attempt to do army bashing - and that too as guests posting on a Pakistani forum which accepts these people and allows them to post hastily written garbage.
Pakistan and KSA have a joint officers program and intel sharing between both is going on for years. To suggest that the army is instrumental in promoting Wahhabism in Pakistan or anything to the tune of that is mere sensationalism.
I can name at least one serving COAS who in fact defied Saudi advice for Pakistan to participate in something the Saudis openly supported (Pakistan sending contributing forces to Iraq in 1990) and that too despite the fact that Saddam supported terrorism in Baluchistan Province.
When sensationalism begets stupidity, you know you won't have a debate worthy topic
Now to answer some points you made:
a.) you conveniently forget the millions strong Pakistani diaspora in KSA, some of whom return and bring a newly learned culture with them (some are born in KSA and have never even lived or step foot in Pakistan)
b.) the Army is a product of the people it serves, as it comes from the people itself....they aren't martians from outer space, nor are they from the bourgeoisie elitist class as they were in the 1950s and 60s.
c.) it is the responsibility of the GOVT, not the Army -- to ensure that all foreign-funded religious schools are not preaching anti-national or "exteme" (self-serving) interpretations of the Quran. The Army's job is just to defend the borders from the enemy(s)
d.) with regards to the latter part of your post in which you say:
here's a link to The Nation -- a report of an attack by LeJ -- in which the name of the organization as well as members wanted for questioning was listed
Banned outfit behind twin blasts | The Nation
and i've heard the banter about Nation being "right-wing" and "pro Army" many a time!
here's another
Sipah-e-Sahaba leader shot dead in Khairpur: police | The Nation
Sir, low level individuals do not have the power to sway official policy, you need to be in a position of power to do that. You don't always have to participate in murder, you turning a blind eye to the injustice makes you just as complicit in the crime as the guy who pulls the trigger. The PA have no qualms letting the Saudi ideology and funding pour into the country as long as it got it's share of the moola and it served the perceived purpose. It bred the chickens and well and was flabbergasted when they came home to roost.
a.) you conveniently forget the millions strong Pakistani diaspora in KSA, some of whom return and bring a newly learned culture with them (some are born in KSA and have never even lived or step foot in Pakistan)
This argument has no legs because things don't work that way. In order for there to be an ideological shift, the push needs to come from the very top, by top i mean the people who have the power to shape up (read manipulate) the psyche of the proletariat. The have various tools at their disposal, from literature to television to seminary's, it became all too easy after the second world war. To further accentuate my point let me give you the example of the UK which is home to the second largest Pakistani diaspora however you cannot make the argument that the expats there bring home the British version of Islam (whatever that might be). Hope that made sense.
b.) the Army is a product of the people it serves, as it comes from the people itself....they aren't martians from outer space, nor are they from the bourgeoisie elitist class as they were in the 1950s and 60s.
That maybe so, but the people in the high cabals of power do have that bourgeois mentality and then some.
c.) it is the responsibility of the GOVT, not the Army -- to ensure that all foreign-funded religious schools are not preaching anti-national or "exteme" (self-serving) interpretations of the Quran. The Army's job is just to defend the borders from the enemy(s)
Again, that argument would be valid had Pakistan been ruled by a people's government but that wasn't the case now was it? instead we had the army that held the reigns of the country over large swathes of time. The proof is in the pudding as they say and when you analyze the whole situation without the inherent bias of loving ones armed forces, you'll come to the conclusion that since it was the army that made most of the decisions during Pakistanis 60 plus year history therefore it is her that needs to share some of the blame for the cancer that was allowed to flourish within the society. You have to take ownership of the bad things that happened in your reign just like you do with the good ones.