What's new

Pakistan secretly permitting lethal NATO supply via air

Roybot

BANNED
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
20,064
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
Australia
Islamabad: In blatant disregard to foreign policy terms approved by parliament this year, Pakistan has secretly allowed US-led Nato forces to use its airspace for transporting lethal supplies to Afghanistan, official sources revealed.

It is not clear when the permission was granted but it is believed to be a stop gap arrangement between Pakistan and the United States till they finalise a deal on the resumption of vital land routes for foreign forces in Afghanistan. But the move is likely to spark a strong public backlash in view of parliament’s resolutions which state that Pakistan’s territory, including its airspace, shall not be used for transportation of arms and ammunition to Afghanistan.

A credible source told The Express Tribune that the foreign office and the defence ministry were at odds with each other over allowing Nato planes to carry weapons. The foreign office opposed the decision considering it a violation of parliament’s resolutions. However, it eventually started issuing non-objection certificates (NoCs) to such planes after pressure from defense authorities.

According to the rules, the foreign office forwards NoCs to the Pakistan Air Force, which then allows the aircraft to fly over Pakistan. However, a senior ministry official denied the foreign office had any part in granting such permission. The official said the role of the foreign office was that of a ‘post office’ in this case and it was the defense ministry and other concerned authorities, which were supposed to determine and grant permission for any planes carrying weapons.

When approached, foreign ministry spokesperson Moazam Ali Khan insisted that all decisions were being taken in line with the resolution of parliament.“You have to ask this question from the Ministry of Defense,” he replied, when asked if Pakistan had permitted Nato to use its air corridor for transportation of weapons.

However, when contacted, the defense ministry threw the ball in the military’s court, which also refused to comment over the issue, saying it was the prerogative of the government. Reluctance from the concerned authorities to publically speak on the subject is thought to be linked to the fact that none of the departments wants to take responsibility of allowing lethal supplies via air. The US, which has voiced frustration over the continued blockade of land routes, would not speak directly on the controversy.

A US embassy spokesperson refused to confirm or deny the development. “We continue to work with the government of Pakistan to resolve the political questions related to the Lines of Communication through Pakistan to supply US/Nato/Isaf forces in Afghanistan,” Mark Sroh told The Express Tribune, while dodging questions regarding the supply of weapons through air.

Pakistan and the US are currently negotiating a new agreement to reopen land routes. However, talks are deadlocked over the issue of an apology, which Islamabad has been demanding by the US over last year’s Nato cross border raid in Salala that left 24 Pakistani soldiers dead.

Earlier this year, Pakistan confirmed that it allowed Nato planes carrying non-lethal supplies to use its air space. But Islamabad has never publically acknowledged that it also granted permission for transportation of weapons.

Pakistan secretly permitting lethal NATO supply via air – The Express Tribune
 
. .
One can see the double standard of Pakistan!! Apology, Apology???? What's the Fuzz about it now????
 
. .
One can see the double standard of Pakistan!! Apology, Apology???? What's the Fuzz about it now????

You idiot, Pakistan's airspace is an International Air Route, it's a global concern like International shipping lanes are. We can't just shut down planes flying through our airspace. The roads are our concern and have been dealt with but our airspace is an international route, we cannot deny access to any aircraft unless it is considered a security risk or enters our airspace with intent to harm.
Secondly, NATO is receiving their supply through Russia and the CARs, can't see why they would fly over Pakistan, where do these flights pick their cargo from? From the flight path it would suggest they have an alternate supply port somewhere in Asia-Pacific, which we know they don't, so I believe this piece is bogus.
 
.
the air-space was never blocked. NATO/US/ISAF enjoys a 'air corrodor' dedicated for their aircraft. they had landing rights which are now restricted for 'emergencies only'. so whats the secret.!!!
 
.
One can see the double standard of Pakistan!! Apology, Apology???? What's the Fuzz about it now????

Air space was never closed for NATO... but you know it costs alot also they cannot take as much from airpace as they can from ground..
 
.
You idiot, Pakistan's airspace is an International Air Route, it's a global concern like International shipping lanes are. We can't just shut down planes flying through our airspace. The roads are our concern and have been dealt with but our airspace is an international route, we cannot deny access to any aircraft unless it is considered a security risk or enters our airspace with intent to harm.
Secondly, NATO is receiving their supply through Russia and the CARs, can't see why they would fly over Pakistan, where do these flights pick their cargo from? From the flight path it would suggest they have an alternate supply port somewhere in Asia-Pacific, which we know they don't, so I believe this piece is bogus.

qatar/bahrein-->over baluchistan-->kandahar-->baghram

Air space was never closed for NATO... but you know it costs alot also they cannot take as much from airpace as they can from ground..

C5's and C17's can carry a **** load. its just expensive thats all!
 
.
One can see the double standard of Pakistan!! Apology, Apology???? What's the Fuzz about it now????

And you think that Americans have straight policies..:rofl: they are the forefathers of Double Standards, even Indian Govt. Has double standards we see everyday......every country looks for its benefits......and specially country like Pakistan where 70% politicians are theivies and ruling this country, what else we can expect from them.
 
.
if we stop their air routes then god help them, its like leaving mouth alone, we are now blocking their anus :lol:
 
.
Its for the greater good. I don't see why Indians are trying to make this seem like "rubbing salt on on a open wound" scenario.
 
.
You idiot, Pakistan's airspace is an International Air Route, it's a global concern like International shipping lanes are. We can't just shut down planes flying through our airspace. The roads are our concern and have been dealt with but our airspace is an international route, we cannot deny access to any aircraft unless it is considered a security risk or enters our airspace with intent to harm.

Even Military planes? So Indian Military transport planes can fly over Pakistan to Afghanistan?

Don't make it sound like that Pakistan is under some obligation to let the American planes through its air space. :confused:
 
.
Even Military planes? So Indian Military transport planes can fly over Pakistan to Afghanistan?

Don't make it sound like that Pakistan is under some obligation to let the American planes through its air space. :confused:

Dude they know to the level they can piss Uncle Sam, beyond which there will be serious repurcussions.
 
.
You idiot, Pakistan's airspace is an International Air Route, it's a global concern like International shipping lanes are. We can't just shut down planes flying through our airspace. The roads are our concern and have been dealt with but our airspace is an international route, we cannot deny access to any aircraft unless it is considered a security risk or enters our airspace with intent to harm.

Is that a fact..? I was not aware of it. My understanding was that a country can deny entry into its airspace without having to give any justification what so ever. Can you point me to some links on this.
 
.
qatar/bahrein-->over baluchistan-->kandahar-->baghram

C5's and C17's can carry a **** load. its just expensive thats all!

A little (Iran supply dirt cheap fuel to northern alliance), with land route through Pakistan, they have opportunity to slip some containers within Pakistan. Which is vital to US strategy of balkaniziking Pakistan and US is loosing TIME ans this is where US loose HUGE money.

Second advantage with land routes is Pakistan's infrastructure get damaged and in return Pakistan take loan from IMF for repair and construction, eventual increase in taxes to and impact on economy give rise to corruption.

In short land supply is a multi prong approach to destroy Pakistan in a technical way.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom