Bangladesh did never asked Pakistan for 'repeated' apology. Pakistan never officially apologized for it's army's crime in 1971.
Yes, Bangladesh does exactly that .
Pakistan apologized in 1974.
www.nytimes.com
NEW DELHI, April 10—1974.
Pakistan apologized today for her army's violence during the 1971. Bangladesh war. The apology, which coincided with the decision by Bangladesh to drop the proposed war‐crimes trials of 195 Pakistanis, was disclosed with the release of the agreement signed last night by the Foreign Ministers of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
The delicate face‐saving compromise was worked out after five days of talks Essentially, Pakistan and Bangladesh gained what they wanted: Pakistan will receive all her prisoners held in captivity since the was including the 195 men Bangladesh wanted to place on trial for murder and rape. Bangladesh, which agreed to drop the trials, earned a public apology, a veiled acknowledgment by Pakistan that some of hers troops had been recklessly violent.
The prisoner issue and the threatened war‐crimes trial were a vivid and constant reminder on the subcontinent of the 1971 India‐Pakistan war, winch resulted in the loss of Palastan's eastern wing and the creation of Bandladesh.
Accord of Foreign Ministers
The agreement was released simultaneously tonight in New Delhi, Dacca and Islamabad. It was signed by Foreign Ministers Swaran Singh of India, Kamal Hossain of Bangladesh and Aziz Ahmed of Pakistan.
General Musharraf's personal regret do not count. What our govt. and a large part of our civil society seek is an official apology involving Pakistan's parliament. This should be an one time affair. But many Bangladeshi do not expect Pakistan to be that generous or self reflecting. So it seems, this issue will remain a thorn on the relation between the two countries for generations like what we see between Turkey and Armenia.
Pakistan has apologized on April 10 1974 in an accord signed by Bangladesh Foreign Minister Kamal Hossain and Pakistan Foreign Minister Aziz Ahmed. The talks were sponsored by India.
There were no war crimes. Your ally India would have handed the prisoners over to Bangladesh to be prosecuted if it had believed there were any war criminals amongst the prisoners.
Not a single Pakistani officer, soldier, or civilian captured by India was turned over to Bangladesh for prosecution. All 45,000 armed forces personnel, and an additional 45,000 civilians were returned with honor under the aegis of the Red Cross, to Pakistan.
Pakistanis surrendered only to Indian forces, and not to Bangladesh forces which Pakistan never recognized.
War crimes are prosecuted by the victor, not by a junior ally. Pakistani forces committed no war crimes against India.
There is no defence pact with India. Military relation with India is minimal except for some goodwill visit and small scale joint training. We never brought even a single bullet from India. On the other hand most of our defence equipment comes from China which India considers to be an adversary.
Disagree. Bangladesh has just procured 120 mm mortars from India. The BD army uses TATA trucks, Bangladesh has signed a separate defense deal with India in 2017.
The Indian government, in line with US geo-strategic manoeuvres, is attempting to reduce Bangladesh’s military and economic reliance on China.
www.wsws.org
Bangladesh's only strategic defence co-operation agreement is with China which was signed in 2002. What you are referring is 25 years India-Bangladesh friendship treaty which was signed soon after our independence. It was a much controversial agreement in Bangladesh and never uphold by any govt. This treaty expired in 1997 and never renewed. So it's case is closed long time ago.
The 1972 Indo-Bangladesh Mutual Treaty of Friendship was never controversial. It was approved by the Jatiyo Sansad by the government headed by the Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman himself.
In 2015 and 2017 additional defense treaties were signed.
India-Bangladesh defence cooperation: Coming of age, at last?
www.orfonline.org
You seems to be an over jealous Pakistani. He said those words in good faith yet you replied him in this manner. But the global tourism do not work like what you are saying here like 'why should I go to that country when my country has more beautiful scenery than that?'. People go to other countries to experience different culture, different living style, different cuisines, different landscape, different urban vibes, different entertainment, shopping experience etc. Otherwise why an American should visit Mexico or Canada when United States has everything within their border more so than Mexico or Canada? As far as I know, Americans are the largest number of tourists group in Mexico.
You can say, Bangladesh is not a country for holiday tourism or not an interesting place to visit for an average Pakistani. Which I would accept. But your reasoning here is not right according to tourism industry perspective.
Wrong Parallel.
- Mexico and USA are neighboring countries and there is a large Latino population in the USA with relatives in Mexico.This makes up a large part of the "tourist population" traveling back and forth between Mexico and the USA.
- Mexico and the USA also have close trade ties (even after NAFTA was watered down), and there is heavy commercial road traffic between the two countries.
- Mexico and the USA are not enemy nations and Americans are very welcome in Mexico.
- Mexico has some excellent tourist destinations like Cancun which are world class.
The comparison with Pakistan and Bangladesh does not match the USA Mexico relationship,
Bangladesh and Pakistan have no borders, no common population segment, no significant volume of trade and are officially enemy countries since no Peace and Reconciliation treaty has been signed. There are no world class or world heritage sites of interest to Pakistanis in Bangladesh. Pakistanis would much rather travel to China, Afghanistan, Iran and also to Turkey. We have a shared cultural heritage with Afghanistan, Iran, Western China, and Turkey. Pakistan shares a segment of the population speaking a common language with Iran and Afghanistan.
There is no shared heritage or culture with Bangladesh. There was a shared history which is best forgotten.