What's new

Pakistan rejects reports of nuclear insecurity

Get a grip, man! Even if you believe what you say is true, when you have to go back 8 years to find a lie told by an American policymaker but only a day to find one told by a Pakistani minister you should be able to deduce which side your subconscious is telling you commands more "truth" than the other - and give more conscious thought to what causes, exactly, you should be loyal to and openly advocate.
Getting it all wrong aren't you ? I am not saying that the lie was only told by American policy makers but rather your whole media manipulated the Americans and the world and opinion built so that US of A can attack Iraq ... A lie is a lie ... If your media deliberately lied and destroyed a whole country back then ( taking into account the mess in Iraq is in and Americans planning to escape by this year end ) , why the **** should i even take the report seriously ? Maybe its the same this time too ... It just makes a nice plot for the next 007 film but nothing else ...
 
. .
Now you're on to something. Why did his sources tell Goldberg that this is how Pakistan is transporting its nukes?

The reason is pretty obvious. The sources are putting Pakistan on notice: if there is some "unexplained" or "terrorist" nuclear attack somewhere in the world, it is highly likely that Pakistan will be considered its home address and the country can expect retribution as a result.

Now Pakistan not only has to worry about its own nukes, but those of any of the other "rogue" states out there: Iran, North Korea, Burma, Syria. Even if one of them sets one off somewhere, Pakistan is going to get it afterward.
Who is Goldberg ? UN Secretary or the American president ? Why should we worry about what sources told him what and why ? Ponder over it ... I am sure that Americans feel enlightened when their propaganda media reports these bullshit fantasy reports :rofl:

Sorry to disappoint you , but Pakistan not exactly the sort of country you can bully and attack :P So keep your assumptions to yourself ... :wave:
 
.
Completely assembled with fuel and triggering mechanisms :rofl:

did they gave any reason why they were completely assembled? because it sounds b***sh*t
and naive Americans think Nukes are some old TNT explosives which anyone can detonate with simple fuses and such ? :lol: Why would they even transport it with triggering mechanisms so that they look like nukes ? :P How exactly can a nuke be delivered without missiles or plane to long distances ( unless ofcourse the delivery vans contain ballistic missiles too :rofl: ) ? If even the rough elements get their hands on the nuke , how will some illiterate cave dwellers know the complex codes required to detonate nukes ? Pakistan has its own version of Permissive Action Link which means that the nukes cant be detonated without permission of three people ( authorized by codes ) usually the President , Army Chief and Joint Chief of Staff and last time i checked they weren't from some banned militant organization :D ...


Bypassing a PAL should be, as one weapons designer graphically put it, about as complex as performing a tonsillectomy while entering the patient from the wrong end.
—Peter D. Zimmerman, nuclear physicist and weapons inspector[12]
 
.
but even in those movies the weapons where assembled for a reason. (they was a war or something else) or what the hijackers did in those movies was the forced the staff to assemble the weapon

they have not provided anythig like that in this new story. :rofl:

Watch the movie District B13

District 13 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Damien immediately receives another assignment from his chief and also the Defence Secretary of France, Mr Krüger. He is told that Taha has stolen an experimental neutron bomb that is set to detonate in 24 hours. His mission is to convince Leïto, imprisoned for months, to lead him to Taha's base so that he can disarm the bomb.
Damien attempts to pass himself off as a fellow prisoner and helps Leïto escape to B13, but Leïto sees through Damien's act and abandons him. After fighting off some of the local thugs, Damien locates Leïto and admits the truth. They team up to disarm the bomb and rescue Lola. The pair surrenders to Taha in order to gain access to his base. There, they discover that Taha has rigged the warhead to a missile launcher, pointed towards the center of Paris and is prepared to blackmail the government with it. Taha demands a high ransom, which is refused by Damien's government contact. The pair escape, and while Taha's thugs pursue them, he discovers that the government has emptied all of his offshore accounts in the Bahamas and elsewhere. One of Taha's men asks how Taha will pay them. Frustrated Taha tries to shoot the member who asked him that only noticing his gun to be unloaded. Taha offers money from a safe he possesses. Knowing that with Tahas accounts emptied and unable to have any reason to work for him the thugs shoot Taha. This leaves K2, a more sympathetic character, in charge and K2 has a moment of reconciliation with Leïto, suggesting that peace is possible in the future within B13.

Leïto and Damien fight their way to the tower building holding Lola and the bomb. They are confronted by their final obstacle: Yeti, a substantial henchman left by Taha to block their access to the bomb. Having defeated Yeti, Damien calls his contact to receive the deactivation code, 9293709B13. Leïto recognizes the code as a reference to the bomb's location (92 and 93 are the two area codes of the departements that make up District 13), the day's date (7 September), and the district, B13. Leïto deduces that the government has set them up and the code will actually detonate the bomb instead of deactivating it. He fights Damien to prevent him from entering the code. The timer runs out and the bomb does not detonate, proving Leïto's theory.


The pair return to the government building with the bomb and force Mr Krüger to admit that he had planned to blow up B13 as a means to get rid of it. The confession has been filmed and is immediately broadcast by pirate television transmission across all channels. The pair's actions cause a major scandal that sparks public support for B13. Soon the rest of the government promises to tear down the containment wall and bring back schools and police to B13. Leïto and Damien depart as friends, and Lola kisses Damien to encourage him to visit B13 in the future.

Banlieue13.jpg


So I am expecting soon my neighbourhood to hear chants like..

Aya nuke wala.....nuke le loo nuke leee...baray baray gool gool nuke le loo..Ghori bhe hai, shaheen, haft, nasr....aaaya nuke walaaaay!!

now thats thinking outside the box

Now thats a55 kissing without pants!
 
.
Here's what National Strategic Command says about the issue:

Cut the Bull**** unless you can prove it.
 
.
Who is Goldberg ? UN Secretary or the American president ? Why should we worry about what sources told him what and why ? Ponder over it ... I am sure that Americans feel enlightened when their propaganda media reports these bullshit fantasy reports :rofl:

Sorry to disappoint you , but Pakistan not exactly the sort of country you can bully and attack :P So keep your assumptions to yourself ... :wave:

Please recall the phone call. One phone call in middle of night is enough!!
 
.
Please recall the phone call. One phone call in middle of night is enough!!
Nukes are a different matter troller ... I can understand your itch to troll here but try to understand that giving access to nukes isn't the same as providing support and transit to defeat some terrorist ...
 
. . .
Please recall the phone call. One phone call in middle of night is enough!!

Going by your logic, Pakistan should have committed when the US asked for 20K troops for the Iraq campaign.
How do you explain this anomaly in your "One Phone Call" theory ?
 
.
Going by your logic, Pakistan should have committed when the US asked for 20K troops for the Iraq campaign.
How do you explain this anomaly in your "One Phone Call" theory ?

You know what, when usa wants, they demands and will not ask.
 
. . .
That decision was based on the requirement and on merits.

I understand however, my reply was intended to rebut the poster's notion that it takes "One Phone Call" to bully Pakistan.
I hope you will see it in light of the continuing discussion.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom