May not be a boogeyman but also not upto what the PAF wants. Stop gaps were made based on emergency situations but as such the PAF has different ideas for Long range systems(or rather the IADS that is being built up as a cross service system).
There is a large gap between what everyone has in their inventory and what they have ready to go day 1. The Harpy is a very temperamental system to deploy and the IAF has focused on KH-31s instead.
how do you so confident that we have it? and how do you know location that its deployed in the Lahore sector, its all just assumptions, wishful thinking and rumors, not a single valid and concrete evidences
What PAF wants sir? HQ 9 has AESA Radar with missile capable of reaching 200km range,what else they want?
No No.
Firstly, Babur can be deployed for both strategic & conventional role.
In fact there are two version of it, one which is well known is nuclear capable and other is for specific conventional role. It is meant to penetrate in Indian ballistic defense systems as well as air defense in order to render them use less against of ballistic missiles or air crafts.
This missile was particularly developed by keeping it's usage as SEAD asset.....
And yes, it can house conventional war head as well as anti radar seeker.
As far as point of nuclear retaliation by observing "possible nuclear capable missile approach" is concerned, well that is very different thing. Cruise missiles have varying ballistic paths and remote trajectories. By judging trajectory, flight path, possible target it's pretty easy to assume that what type of warhead missile is carrying .
And no one neither respond aggressively by "suspecting" a nuclear capable missile launch nor the enemy fires a lone less leathel sub sonic cruise missile to start a nuclear war
Of course it will be.
www.ausairpower.net/APA-NOTAM-061209-1.html
so bro what do you think about hq 16 and paf requirement.why paf loves semi active missiles for its SAMS when world is moving toward aesa equipped missile.not saying go get the most expensive asea equipped missile but least we could do is go for active missiles which are less susceptible to jamming then semi active one.
I was thinking on same line, @Rashid Mahmood sir looking forward for your comments,armament is being purchased before platform why,either deal was made public late or something else.
so what you mean to say we are not getting these 60s era yu 3 and yu 4 for our modern subs and this report is hoax
Lol what an idiot.
Has no idea what and how the E.M spectrum works like.
Like they used AWACS for the MH370 search.
But as you know that sir,chinese shipyard officals said that KARACHI SHIP YARD requires little upgrade because it has been already in sub building business,does that means that setup time would be less as compared to new facility.
