Pakistan puts US on notice to ‘fix’ Afghanistan

[Trango Towers]

That is funny... Russia will not gonna again in Afghanistan. he wants only secure their interest.

US and Russia need to work together in Afghanistan and other countries I . e India, China and Pakistan have to play their role. but, there is difference on their interest..... so nothing gonna change in Afghanistan

india wont even be allowed to play gulli dunda in Afghanistan. this is our back yard.

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

india wont even be allowed to play gulli dunda in Afghanistan. this is our back yard.

Gulli dunda? I thought Afghanistan's parliament building was built by Indians.

 

[Theparadox]

Gulli dunda? I thought Afghanistan's parliament building was built by Indians.

And dam too, why don't we deploy force in Afghanistan too then Russia won't create hassle for US.

 

[Trango Towers]

Gulli dunda? I thought Afghanistan's parliament building was built by Indians.

WAS is the correct term to use.

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

WAS is the correct term to use.

No. The correct term to use is IF. If Americans stay in Afghanistan long enough, Indians can change the face of that country. Then it will become irrelevant whether Americans stay there or not.

 

[The Eagle]

"sort out its mess in Afghanistan, or Russia will"

and then.... recent N-NB attack on ISIS in Afghanistan. Talking of serious business here and the result is prominent.

 

[Eminent Mainstream Media]

Bollywood, your media and Indian posters here say otherwise.

Only you people take Bollywood seriously- what next Pogo channel too ?

 

[Trango Towers]

No. The correct term to use is IF. If Americans stay in Afghanistan long enough, Indians can change the face of that country. Then it will become irrelevant whether Americans stay there or not.

my dear neighbour....try to give your own Indians before trying to fix Afghanistan.
you are also admitting without americans in Afghanistan you wont be able to do jack.

 

[Bharat Muslim]

my dear neighbour....try to give your own Indians before trying to fix Afghanistan.
you are also admitting without americans in Afghanistan you wont be able to do jack

Regardless of past history, India has remained united like never before!

1. Separatist militancy in Punjab and North East has been put down.
2. The one in Kashmir doesn't make any difference.
3. Naxalite insurgency seems to be under control.
4. The 1991 economic crises were so successfully dealt with that India emerged stronger after the crises.
5. Democracy is functional.
6. Far from disintegrating or losing territory except in 1962, the institution of India has been becoming stronger and has in fact along the way, annexed one strategically significant Himalayan state of Sikkim.

These are not signs of a country that would disintegrate.

But wait. One option has not been tested yet. The option of using nuclear weapons has not been tried yet. Nuclear strike may provide the breakthrough against the resilience of India. Nuclear strike may be the game changer.

Who knows? Use of nuclear weapons may signal the end of India.

Unity of post-1947 India is no big deal. Post-1947, India's unity was probably because of modern technologies of communication and transportation. Communication technology included television, photography, telephone and print media etcetera. Transportation technology included railways, aero planes and ships. You have to thank West for this factor of technology. Take away this factor and it is doubtful if India would have survived even 10 years. But technological development is a double-edged sword. If Western technology created united India, the same factor – in the form of nuclear weapons and missiles – can also undo this creation. So the gist of the thread is nuclear weapons and missiles are the acid tests for the idea of India.

 

[Trango Towers]

Regardless of past history, India has remained united like never before!

1. Separatist militancy in Punjab and North East has been put down.
2. The one in Kashmir doesn't make any difference.
3. Naxalite insurgency seems to be under control.
4. The 1991 economic crises were so successfully dealt with that India emerged stronger after the crises.
5. Democracy is functional.
6. Far from disintegrating or losing territory except in 1962, the institution of India has been becoming stronger and has in fact along the way, annexed one strategically significant Himalayan state of Sikkim.

These are not signs of a country that would disintegrate.

But wait. One option has not been tested yet. The option of using nuclear weapons has not been tried yet. Nuclear strike may provide the breakthrough against the resilience of India. Nuclear strike may be the game changer.

Who knows? Use of nuclear weapons may signal the end of India.

Unity of post-1947 India is no big deal. Post-1947, India's unity was probably because of modern technologies of communication and transportation. Communication technology included television, photography, telephone and print media etcetera. Transportation technology included railways, aero planes and ships. You have to thank West for this factor of technology. Take away this factor and it is doubtful if India would have survived even 10 years. But technological development is a double-edged sword. If Western technology created united India, the same factor – in the form of nuclear weapons and missiles – can also undo this creation. So the gist of the thread is nuclear weapons and missiles are the acid tests for the idea of India.

What waffle.....You wrote all that and said nothing

 

[Bharat Muslim]

What waffle.....You wrote all that and said nothing

What I meant to say is: Your suggestion of looking after our own country was uncalled for. See how stable we are and how smoothly our democracy is functioning. But then I also mentioned our probable weakness.

P.S.: Why didn't you try to stabilise Afghanistan for so many years? What were you doing? Soviets left in 1992, didn't they? Why didn't you help Afghanistan in reconstruction effort?

 

[Trango Towers]

What I meant to say is: Your suggestion of looking after our own country was uncalled for. See how stable we are and how smoothly our democracy is functioning. But then I also mentioned our probable weakness.

P.S.: Why didn't you try to stabilise Afghanistan for so many years? What were you doing? Soviets left in 1992, didn't they? Why didn't you help Afghanistan in reconstruction effort?

Oh pleAse kid yourself not us

 

[Centurion2016]

india wont even be allowed to play gulli dunda in Afghanistan. this is our back yard.

Pakistan can't dictate events in Pakistan,

To decide the fate of your region your need financial muscle and diplomatic support of the big players.

Pakistan has neither money or support

In this region your lack of economic power means your voice is unheard no matter how loud you shout nuclear warheads

Nobody in the world is listening not even Bhutan or sri lankavnever mind Afghanistan

 

[Trango Towers]

Pakistan can't dictate events in Pakistan,

To decide the fate of your region your need financial muscle and diplomatic support of the big players.

Pakistan has neither money or support

In this region your lack of economic power means your voice is unheard no matter how loud you shout nuclear warheads

Nobody in the world is listening not even Bhutan or sri lankavnever mind Afghanistan

We don't really care about what the world thinks. What we care about is when you decide to take us on we will press a button. They world can say what it likes....forgot it will be too late.
Remember we didn't have money or influence yet the Soviets were defeated and now NATO has been defeated by rag tag army. Can India do that????? It can't even make tejas fly

 

[SorryNotSorry]

there is no rocket science to understand that who hold the influence in afghanistan after U.S... obviously india... we have enough proof to prove but we will not expose it because it will hurt other nations too. and we don't wanna start ww3.. write down my words if U.S keep supporting india it will cause the WW3. if any person who belong to U.S and Israeli agancies and military can understand my statement easily.. we dont need to tell you every thing

Please quote a source proving you have this proof against India.

tell me where israel stands ---
on pakistan side (recognition of israel in muslim world).. which means peace, humanity and love around the world
OR
on India side (cause of starting the WW3, and few military contract).. which means anarchy, war, injustice and hatred around the world.

do you even know the back channel of Pak and israel ?

Read up on history and you will have a very clear answer to your question.