Rafi
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2010
- Messages
- 11,752
- Reaction score
- 13
- Country
- Location
There is no such ban. The only question is who pays for them, that is all.
You being a US citizen and apologist, are clearly biased.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is no such ban. The only question is who pays for them, that is all.
You being a US citizen and apologist, are clearly biased.
And also factually correct.
In your biased opinion, the US is not to be trusted.
New Recruit
The fact remains that there is no ban on weapons acquisitions by Pakistan. It is just that Pakistan also wants USA to pay for them, rather than using its own resources.
Besides, trust is a two way street.
We won't be allowed that luxury because, Israel and india have backers sitting at the highest echelons of the establishments in the reigning global powers. they are everything we can never be, if you know what I mean. Second, we are not smart enough to formulate successful policies to benefit our nation like the aforementioned states. Our foreign office is manned by sellouts or the incompetent staff. No doubt we will make the worst out of a best opportunity.Right. It's a good time to not be aligned fully with the Sino/Russian group...
Be like India, play both sides.
India deals with both Russia and the US. Israel plays all sides. Russian, Chinese, Indian and US. It even tries to be goodie goodie with Pakistan...
In our case autocratic regime s didn't do any better that democratic ones either. The establishment and the technocrats/bureaucrats are too corrupt and incompetent.Trying to run the car on a dead battery.
Either play jamwhoriat in the useless elitist halls or be autocratic and rise like China.
We don't have an autocratic party system like China.In our case autocratic regime s didn't do any better that democratic ones either. The establishment and the technocrats/bureaucrats are too corrupt and incompetent.
Correct the US govt talks with forked tongue as our Native brothers and sisters said.
But Sir, there is no overwhelming Chinese military presence in Pakistan. Infact Paksitan's policy is no Chinese boots on Pakistan's Ground at larger even at smaller scale.Pak is the USA’s major “bait” in this region!!! The overwhelming Chinese military presence inside Pak is a thing to prevent at any means by the Pentagon. However, Pak can’t be bent by the external pressure alone, so it’s the time to “do more” for the Pentagon.....
But US's biggest concern is Chinese BRI, CPEC, Gawader port as essential part of BRI and CPEC. Also there unprecedent support of Paksitan in terms of foreign investment, militarily, weaponization and modern technology transfer.Pak is the USA’s major “bait” in this region!!! The overwhelming Chinese military presence inside Pak is a thing to prevent at any means by the Pentagon. However, Pak can’t be bent by the external pressure alone, so it’s the time to “do more” for the Pentagon.....
And yet Pakistan still wants to buy their military hardware? Tsk, tsk.
But as the thread says, Pakistan is the central pivot between the two great powers, and may be now it will find no forked tongues, or other body parts, with its newly chosen overlords.
LoL typical yank, you ever get tired of hyping the great white father, you clearly love so much. Even real yanks aren't that cringe.
And yet there is no hype in any of my previous posts, or this one, only facts, and demonstrably so.